Votación en el Parlamento Europeo

Marco fiscal coherente para el sector financiero de la Unión

Matthias Ecke - Propuesta de Resolución (conjunto del texto)
Fecha: 07.07.2026·Referencia: A10-0169/2026
Ponente: Matthias Ecke

Resultado general

Aprobada
  • 418 A favor
  • 152 En contra
  • 85 Abstención
  • 64 No votó
Estado y procedimiento

Resultado según el Parlamento Europeo.

Votación celebrada el
Último paso documentado
Pleno · (hace 155 días)
Próximo paso previsto
La fuente no prevé ningún otro paso.

Desarrollo del procedimiento

2024/2117(INI) · INI

Actividades documentadas del procedimiento. No demuestran que una ley haya entrado en vigor.

  1. Documentado: Remisión377 días hasta el siguiente paso
  2. Documentado: Examen en comisión127 días hasta el siguiente paso
  3. Último documentado: Pleno155 días desde el inicio de este paso
Actividades documentadas (10)
  1. Remisión a comisión
  2. Presentación del informe en comisión
  3. Presentación de enmiendas en comisión
  4. Aprobación del informe en comisión
  5. Presentación al pleno
  6. Presentación al pleno
  7. Presentación al pleno
  8. Presentación al pleno
  9. Votación en el pleno
  10. Resultados de la votación en el pleno
Actividades previstas (realización no confirmada)
  1. Votación en el pleno

Ficha del procedimiento (OEIL) · Datos del Parlamento Europeo
Consultado:

Fuentes

Datos: EP Open Data API

¿De qué se trata?

  • Sector financiero necesita marco fiscal UE armonizado para 2026 .
  • Exención IVA a servicios financieros desde 1977 obsoleta.
  • Fragmentación cuesta a la UE 750–800 mil millones EUR anuales.
Fuente: Resumen generado por IA con Mistral

Historial de enmiendas (4)

Texto tal como lo publica el PE, en inglés.

  1. Enmienda 3Rechazada

    Paragraph 27

    Presentada por Matthias Ecke, rapporteur · rapporteur

    27. Eliminado: Calls on the Commission to review the impacts of the current VAT regime on the financial sector and to publicly share this analysis; Añadido: Welcomes the comprehensive study published by the Commission in June 2026 on the taxation of the financial sector1a; highlights the conclusions of the study, which confirm that due to the VAT exemption, providers of financial services do not have the right to deduction, which in turn means that many of the sector’s input purchases are subject to VAT, resulting in a tax burden that does not appear on invoices and therefore is commonly referred to as ‘hidden’ VAT; stresses that, according to the study, the original technical rationale for the VAT exemption no longer remains fully valid, and that, combined with divergent national sectoral taxes, the current tax framework creates high compliance burdens, distortions, complexity, legal uncertainty and fragmentation; further highlights that, according to the study, the current framework is not aligned with broader EU policy priorities such as the savings and investment union strategy, and that the most effective way to address the root causes would be a more fundamental reform of the VAT exemption and its interaction with sectoral taxes; calls on the Commission to consider policy options to address identified distortive … ensure that the financial sector makes a fair contribution to public revenues; Añadido: 1a European Commission, ‘Taxation of the Financial Sector’, June 2026.

  2. Enmienda 4Rechazada

    Paragraph 33

    Presentada por Matthias Ecke, Bruno Tobback, Bernd Lange +96 · Members

    … the Council, despite extensive debate, both under unanimity and enhanced cooperation, and Eliminado: takes note of Añadido: regrets the Commission’s announcement about the withdrawal of the FTT proposal in its 2026 work programme; Añadido: calls on the Commission to ensure that any proposal for a coherent framework for taxing the EU financial sector presents a concrete plan to address the policy gap created by the withdrawal of the FTT proposal; emphasises that any new proposal should be no less ambitious than the original FTT proposal in ensuring a fair contribution from the financial sector under clear and predictable rules;

  3. Enmienda 5Rechazada

    Paragraph 34 a (new)

    Presentada por Matthias Ecke, Bruno Tobback, Bernd Lange +93 · Members

    Añadido: 34a. Highlights the fact that coordinated temporary windfall taxes can complement long-term sector-wide taxation by providing short-term revenue in times of crisis without destabilising markets or distorting long-term commercial activity; notes that, in recent years, the profitability of EU banks has increased, reaching historically high levels1a; calls on the Commission to bring forward a legislative proposal for the temporary taxation of exceptional profits in the financial sector, ensuring that the sector makes a fair and coordinated contribution at EU level in periods of extraordinary macroeconomic circumstances; 1a European Banking Authority, ‘Risk Assessment Report of the European Banking Authority – June 2025’.

  4. Enmienda 6Rechazada

    Paragraph 35 a (new)

    Presentada por Matthias Ecke, Bruno Tobback, Bernd Lange +97 · Members

    Añadido: 35a. Notes that financial sector tax regimes should not be used to attract profits and financial activities for tax-driven profit shifting rather than genuine economic activity; notes that exceptionally large volumes of foreign direct investment remain concentrated in low-substance financial structures, providing evidence that such practices persist; regrets that this undermines Member States’ revenues, tax sovereignty and the objectives of the Savings and Investment Union;

Voto por grupo político

Cómo votaron los grupos políticos

Miembros

Mostrando 10 de 719

Posición de voto
NombrePaísGrupoPosición de voto
EspañaS&D
A favor
ItaliaEPP
A favor
FinlandiaEPP
A favor
AustriaGreens/EFA
A favor
EslovaquiaRenew
A favor
CroaciaEPP
A favor
AlemaniaEPP
A favor
AlemaniaGreens/EFA
A favor
IrlandaRenew
A favor
BélgicaEPP
A favor
Mostrar más
Síguenos en Instagram@checksomevotes@checksomevotes_en