Votación en el Parlamento Europeo

Vegetales obtenidos con determinadas nuevas técnicas genómicas y los alimentos y piensos derivados, y modificación del Reglamento (UE) 2017/625

Jessica Polfjärd - Propuesta de rechazo de la Posición del Consejo - Enm. 17= 25=
Fecha: 17.06.2026·Referencia: A10-0175/2026
Ponente: Jessica Polfjärd

Resultado general

Rechazada
  • 201 A favor
  • 431 En contra
  • 29 Abstención
  • 58 No votó
Estado y procedimiento

Resultado según el Parlamento Europeo.

Votación celebrada el
Último paso documentado
Diario Oficial · (hace 140 días)
Próximo paso previsto
La fuente no prevé ningún otro paso.
Publicación en el Diario Oficial documentada

Desarrollo del procedimiento

2023/0226(COD) · COD

Actividades documentadas del procedimiento. No demuestran que una ley haya entrado en vigor.

  1. Documentado: Remisión6 días hasta el siguiente paso
  2. Documentado: Examen en comisión96 días hasta el siguiente paso
  3. Documentado: Pleno9 días hasta el siguiente paso
  4. Documentado: Negociaciones77 días hasta el siguiente paso
  5. Documentado: Pleno377 días hasta el siguiente paso
  6. Documentado: Negociaciones267 días hasta el siguiente paso
  7. Documentado: Examen en comisión92 días hasta el siguiente paso
  8. Documentado: Remisión22 días hasta el siguiente paso
  9. Documentado: Examen en comisión24 días hasta el siguiente paso
  10. Documentado: Pleno2 días hasta el siguiente paso
  11. Documentado: FirmaSiguiente paso el mismo día
  12. Documentado: Otras actividades9 días hasta el siguiente paso
  13. Último documentado: Diario Oficial
Actividades documentadas (32)
  1. Remisión a comisión
  2. Presentación del informe en comisión
  3. Presentación de enmiendas en comisión
  4. Presentación de enmiendas en comisión
  5. Presentación de enmiendas en comisión
  6. Presentación de enmiendas en comisión
  7. Aprobación de la opinión en comisión
  8. Aprobación del informe en comisión
  9. Presentación al pleno
  10. Debate en el pleno
  11. Texto modificado en el pleno
  12. Remitido de nuevo a comisión para negociaciones interinstitucionales
  13. Votación en el pleno
  14. Resultados de la votación en el pleno
  15. Posición del Parlamento en primera lectura
  16. Votación en el pleno
  17. Resultados de la votación en el pleno
  18. Negociaciones interinstitucionales
  19. Negociaciones interinstitucionales
  20. Negociaciones interinstitucionales
  21. Negociaciones interinstitucionales
  22. Acuerdo provisional aprobado en comisión
  23. Remisión a comisión
  24. Presentación de enmiendas en comisión
  25. Presentación del informe en comisión
  26. Aprobación del informe en comisión
  27. Presentación al pleno
  28. Otra actividad documentada
  29. Firma
  30. Votación en el pleno
  31. Resultados de la votación en el pleno
  32. Publicación en el Diario Oficial
Actividades previstas (realización no confirmada)
  1. Debate en el pleno
  2. Votación en el pleno
  3. Votación en el pleno
  4. Votación en el pleno

Ficha del procedimiento (OEIL) · Datos del Parlamento Europeo
Consultado:

Fuentes

Datos: EP Open Data API

¿De qué se trata?

  • Aprobación del reglamento sobre plantas genómicas tras acuerdo.
  • Implementación de nuevas técnicas genómicas desde 2026 .
  • Crítica por violación del principio de subsidiariedad por Estados miembros.
Fuente: Resumen generado por IA con Mistral

Historial de enmiendas (17)

Texto tal como lo publica el PE, en inglés.

  1. Enmienda 1Rechazada

    Recital 34

    Presentada por Christophe Clergeau · S&D

    … to ensure transparency as regards the use of category 1 NGT plant Eliminado: varieties in order Añadido: varieties, to ensure that production chains that wish to remain free from NGT plants and NGT products can do Eliminado: so, Añadido: so and thereby safeguard consumer trust. NGT plants that have obtained a declaration … should contain, inter alia, information on the techniques used to obtain the Eliminado: traits. Añadido: traits as well as detection methods. For transparency reasons, the patent information and the licence declarations provided by …

  2. Enmienda 6Rechazada

    Article 6 – paragraph 3 – point d a (new)

    Presentada por Christophe Clergeau · S&D

    Añadido: (da) methods for sampling (including references to existing official or standardised sampling methods), detection, identification and quantification of the category 1 NGT plant. In cases where it is not feasible to provide an analytical method that identifies and quantifies, if duly justified by the person intending to undertake such a deliberate release, the modalities to comply with analytical method performance requirements shall be adapted as specified in the implementing act adopted in accordance with Article 27, point (c);

  3. Enmienda 7Rechazada

    Article 7 – paragraph 2 – point d a (new)

    Presentada por Christophe Clergeau · S&D

    Añadido: (da) methods for sampling (including references to existing official or standardised sampling methods), detection, identification and quantification of the category 1 NGT plant. In cases where it is not feasible to provide an analytical method that identifies and quantifies, if duly justified by the person intending to undertake such a deliberate release, the modalities to comply with analytical method performance requirements shall be adapted as specified in the implementing act adopted in accordance with Article 27, point (c);

  4. Enmienda 8Rechazada

    Article 9 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2 – point d a (new)

    Presentada por Christophe Clergeau · S&D

    Añadido: (da) methods for sampling, detection, identification and quantification as referred to in Article 6(3) and Article 7(2);

  5. Enmienda 9Rechazada

    Article 27 – paragraph 1 – point c

    Presentada por Christophe Clergeau · S&D

    … arrangements for complying with analytical method performance requirements referred to in Article Añadido: 6(3), point (da), Article 7(2), point (da), Article 14(1), point (l), and Article 20(2).

  6. Enmienda 19Rechazada

    Recital 18 a (new)

    Presentada por Anja Hazekamp, Emma Fourreau, João Oliveira +5 · The Left

    Añadido: (18a) The European Parliament has called for the Union and its Member States not to grant patents on biological material and to safeguard the freedom to operate and the breeders’ exemption for varieties. It should be ensured that breeders have full access to the genetic material of NGT plants, which by definition are not transgenic plants. Access to genetic materials can best be secured when the right of patent holders is exhausted in the hand of the breeder (breeder’s exemption). As current provisions in patent law do not provide for a full breeder’s exemption, it should be ensured that patents should not restrict the use of NGT plants by breeders and farmers. Hence, NGT plants should not be subject to patent legislation, but should for the protection of intellectual property solely be subject to the Community Plant Variety Rights (CPVR) system, as laid down in Council Regulation (EC) No 2100/94, which allows the use of the breeder’s exemption. NGT plants, their derived seeds, their plant material, associated genetic material such as genes and gene sequences, and plant traits should therefore be excluded from patentability. The exclusion from patentability should be applied in a consistent manner across legislation. Furthermore, in order to avoid patents being granted or patent applications being submitted between the date of the entry into force of this Regulation and the application of its provisions, it should be ensured that plant material is excluded from patentability from the day of entry into force of this Regulation. For patents already granted or pending patent applications covering plant material, the effects of patents should be further limited. In addition, the Commission should assess and address, in the forthcoming study, how the broader problem of patents being granted, directly or indirectly, on plant material despite previous efforts to close loopholes, should be further addressed. The assessment should address in particular the role and impact of patents on breeders' and farmers' access to plant reproductive material, seed diversity and affordable prices, as well as on innovation and in particular on opportunities for SMEs. The report of the Commission should be accompanied by the appropriate legislative proposals in order to ensure further necessary adjustments are made to the intellectual property rights framework.

  7. Enmienda 20Rechazada

    Recital 25 a (new)

    Presentada por Anja Hazekamp, Emma Fourreau, João Oliveira +5 · The Left

    Añadido: (25a) Traceability requirements for food and feed produced from NGTs should be established to facilitate the accurate labelling of such products, in accordance with the requirements of Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 22 September 2003 on genetically modified food and feed, so as to ensure that accurate information is available to operators and consumers to enable them to exercise their freedom of choice in an effective manner, as well as to enable control and verification of labelling claims. Requirements for food and feed produced from NGTs should be similar in order to avoid discontinuity of information in cases of change in end use.

  8. Enmienda 23Rechazada

    Article 24 a (new)

    Presentada por Anja Hazekamp, Emma Fourreau, João Oliveira +5 · The Left

    Añadido: Article24a Measures to avoid the unintended presence of category 2 NGT plants Member States shall take appropriate measures to avoid the unintended presence of category 2 NGT plants in products not subject to Directive 2001/18 or Regulation 1829/2003.

  9. Enmienda 26Rechazada

    Recital 1 a (new)

    Presentada por Martin Häusling · Verts/ALE

    Añadido: (1a) Allowing for new genomic techniques and their results to be patented risks giving multinational seed companies even more power over farmers’ access to seeds. In a context where large companies already have a monopoly on seeds and increasingly control natural resources, this would deprive farmers of all freedom of action by making them dependent on private companies. For this reason, patents on these products must be banned.

  10. Enmienda 27Rechazada

    Recital 15 a (new)

    Presentada por Martin Häusling · Verts/ALE

    Añadido: (15a) NGT plants with the potential to persist, reproduce or spread in the environment, within or beyond fields, should be evaluated with the highest level of scrutiny in respect of the impact of such plants on nature and the environment.

  11. Enmienda 30Rechazada

    Recital 68 a (new)

    Presentada por Martin Häusling · Verts/ALE

    Añadido: (68a) Effective traceability, labelling and environmental monitoring rely on the availability of reliable, accurate and validated detection methods capable of identifying and quantifying relevant substances, organisms or products. The development and use of appropriate detection methods, including those enabled by NGTs, are therefore essential to ensure transparency, consumer confidence and the effective implementation of Union law.

  12. Enmienda 31Rechazada

    Article 4 a (new)

    Presentada por Martin Häusling · Verts/ALE

    Añadido: Article 4a Exclusion from patentability NGT plants, plant material, parts thereof, genetic information and the process features they contain shall not be patentable.

  13. Enmienda 32Rechazada

    Article 10 – paragraph 1

    Presentada por Martin Häusling · Verts/ALE

    1. Eliminado: Plant Añadido: Category 1 NGT plants, products containing or consisting of category 1 NGT plant(s) plant reproductive material, including for breeding and scientific purposes, that contains or consists … payment or free of charge, shall bear a label with the indication Eliminado: ‘NGT-1’, Añadido: ‘New Genomic Techniques’. In the case of plant reproductive material, it shall be followed by the identification numbers of the NGT plants it has been …

  14. Enmienda 33Rechazada

    Article 10 – paragraph 1 a (new)

    Presentada por Martin Häusling · Verts/ALE

    Añadido: 1a. Appropriate document-based traceability for NGTs shall be provided by the transmission and holding of information that products contain or consist of NGT plants and product, and the unique codes for those NGTs, at each stage of their placing on the market.

  15. Enmienda 34Rechazada

    Article 11 a (new)

    Presentada por Martin Häusling · Verts/ALE

    Añadido: Article11a Withdrawal of the decision If the monitoring results show that there is a risk to health or the environment, or if new scientific data supports that hypothesis, the competent authority may withdraw its decision referred to in Article 6(8) or statement referred to in Article 7(5). The withdrawal decision must be sent by registered mail to the beneficiary of the decision, who shall have 15 days in which to make observations. In that case, the marketing of the NGT plant or product shall be prohibited from the day following the date of receipt of the registered letter.

  16. Enmienda 36Rechazada

    Article 37 a (new)

    Presentada por Martin Häusling · Verts/ALE

    Añadido: Article37a Amendments to Directive 98/44/EC 1. Article 4 of Directive 98/44/EC1a on the legal protection of biotechnological inventions is amended as follows: (a) In paragraph 1, the following points are added: ‘(ba) NGT plants, plant material, parts thereof, genetic information and process features they contain, as defined in Regulation (EU) .../... [O.J. please insert the number of this Regulation]; (bb) plants, plant material, parts thereof, genetic information and process features they contain that can be yielded by techniques excluded from the scope of Directive 2001/18/EC as listed in Annex I B to that directive.’ (b) the following paragraph is added: ‘3a. Paragraphs 2 and 3 shall be without prejudice to the exclusions from patentability covered in paragraph 1.’ 2. In Article 8, the following paragraph is added: ‘2a. By way of derogation from paragraphs 1 and 2, the protection conferred by a patent on a biological material possessing specific characteristics as a result of the invention shall not extend to biological material possessing the same characteristics that is obtained independently of the patented biological material and from essentially biological processes, or to biological material obtained from such material through propagation or multiplication.’ 3. In Article 9, the following paragraphs are added: ‘1a. By way of derogation from paragraph 1, a plant product containing or consisting of genetic information obtained by a patentable technical process shall not be patentable if it is not distinguishable from plant products containing or consisting of the same genetic information obtained by an essentially biological process. 1b. By way of derogation from paragraph 1, the protection conferred by a patent on a product containing or consisting of genetic information shall not extend to plant material in which the product is incorporated and in which the genetic information is contained and performs its function but which is not distinguishable from plant material obtained or which can be obtained by an essentially biological process. 1c. The protection conferred by a patent on a technical process that enables the production of a product containing or consisting of genetic information shall not extend to plant material in which the product is incorporated and in which the genetic information is contained and performs its function but which is not distinguishable from plant material obtained or which can be obtained by an essentially biological process.’ 1a Directive 98/44/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 6 July 1998 on the legal protection of biotechnological inventions (OJ L 213, 30.7.1998, p. 13).

  17. Enmienda 37Rechazada

    Annex II – point 2 a (new)

    Presentada por Martin Häusling · Verts/ALE

    Añadido: (2a) Potential to persist, reproduce or spread in the environment, within or beyond fields

Voto por grupo político

Cómo votaron los grupos políticos

Miembros

Mostrando 10 de 719

Posición de voto
NombrePaísGrupoPosición de voto
EsloveniaGreens/EFA
A favor
PortugalGUE/NGL
A favor
BélgicaS&D
A favor
CroaciaGreens/EFA
A favor
AlemaniaS&D
A favor
AlemaniaESN
A favor
AlemaniaS&D
A favor
AlemaniaS&D
A favor
PoloniaECR
A favor
EslovaquiaNI
A favor
Mostrar más
Síguenos en Instagram@checksomevotes@checksomevotes_en