Votación en el Parlamento Europeo

Estructura y tipos del impuesto especial que grava el tabaco y los productos relacionados con el tabaco (refundición)

Tomáš Kubín - Propuesta de la Comisión al Consejo
Fecha: 17.06.2026·Referencia: A10-0161/2026
Ponente: Tomáš Kubín

Resultado general

Rechazada
  • 181 A favor
  • 439 En contra
  • 38 Abstención
  • 61 No votó
Estado y procedimiento

Resultado según el Parlamento Europeo.

Votación celebrada el
Último paso documentado
Otras actividades · (hace 149 días)
Próximo paso previsto
La fuente no prevé ningún otro paso.

Desarrollo del procedimiento

2025/0580(CNS) · CNS

Actividades documentadas del procedimiento. No demuestran que una ley haya entrado en vigor.

  1. Documentado: Remisión58 días hasta el siguiente paso
  2. Documentado: Examen en comisión187 días hasta el siguiente paso
  3. Documentado: Pleno9 días hasta el siguiente paso
  4. Último documentado: Otras actividades149 días desde el inicio de este paso
Actividades documentadas (12)
  1. Remisión a comisión
  2. Aprobación de la opinión en comisión
  3. Presentación del informe en comisión
  4. Presentación de enmiendas en comisión
  5. Aprobación del informe en comisión
  6. Presentación al pleno
  7. Presentación al pleno
  8. Presentación al pleno
  9. Presentación al pleno
  10. Otra actividad documentada
  11. Votación en el pleno
  12. Resultados de la votación en el pleno
Actividades previstas (realización no confirmada)
  1. Votación en el pleno

Ficha del procedimiento (OEIL) · Datos del Parlamento Europeo
Consultado:

Fuentes

Datos: EP Open Data API

¿De qué se trata?

  • Reforma de la directiva sobre impuestos al tabaco para armonizar los impuestos especiales.
  • Inclusión de nuevos productos con nicotina como cigarrillos electrónicos y bolsitas de nicotina.
  • Ajuste por inflación de los tipos impositivos cada tres años .
Fuente: Resumen generado por IA con Mistral

Historial de enmiendas (8)

Texto tal como lo publica el PE, en inglés.

  1. Enmienda 89Rechazada

    Recital 3

    Presentada por César Luena · S&D

    (3) It is necessary to ensure that the Eliminado: Union’s Añadido: Union's fiscal legislation on tobacco and tobacco related products continues to ensure the … mind that tobacco and tobacco related products can cause serious harm to Eliminado: health , that Europe’s Beating Cancer Plan2 Añadido: health, that Europe's Beating Cancer Plan set the goal of reaching a tobacco-free Europe and that the Union is Party to the World Health Eliminado: Organization’s Añadido: Organization's Framework Convention on Tobacco Eliminado: Control . Añadido: Control. This health protection objective is particularly pressing as the European region has the highest prevalence of smoking globally1a and the Union is not on track to meet the targets it committed to in its Beating Cancer Plan. To achieve this twin objective the EU and the Member States should … tobacco trade, notably illicit imports of tobacco and related products from third Eliminado: countries3. Añadido: countries. In addition, excise duties resulting in higher retail prices are proven to have a meaningful impact on reducing consumption of tobacco products. Therefore, minimum excise rates should be set at a level to encourage the cessation of tobacco consumption and to prevent substitution amongst product types. New products (liquids for e-cigarettes, other manufactured tobacco, nicotine pouches and other nicotine products) Añadido: also have increasing popularity, especially among young people, Eliminado: and besides Añadido: frustrating the progress in achieving a tobacco-free Europe by 2040. Besides the intrinsic public health risk these products represent, Eliminado: they also have the potential of opening the way towards conventional smoking. Añadido: including as a gateway to conventional smoking and to dual use of both conventional and novel products, their rapid proliferation makes the ambitious recast of this Directive an urgent and once-in-a-generation opportunity to make tobacco and nicotine products less affordable, protect Europeans from addiction, and generate public revenue for health systems. 1a World Health Organisation, "WHO global report on trends in prevalence of tobacco use 2000–2024 and projections 2025–2030", October 2025, https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789240116276 2 Europe's Beating Cancer Plan, COM(2021) 44 final. 3 In the case …

  2. Enmienda 90Rechazada

    Recital 3 a (new)

    Presentada por César Luena · S&D

    Añadido: (3a) The World Health Organization does not recommend the use of nicotine-containing products (liquids for e-cigarettes, other manufactured tobacco, nicotine pouches and other nicotine products) for smoking cessation and instead advocates for strengthening health systems to provide evidence-based cessation measures, including behavioural counselling and approved pharmacotherapies. Instead, these products, whether combustible or smokeless, pose a growing threat to cardiovascular health. While tobacco smoking continues to cause millions of deaths annually, the rapid uptake of e-cigarettes, heated tobacco and synthetic nicotine pouches, particularly among the youth, risks reversing decades of progress in tobacco control. The precautionary principle therefore requires that all such products be subject to excise duties commensurate with their addictive properties and public health risks1a. 1a Münzel, T., Crea, F., Rajagopalan, S., & Lüscher, T. (2025). Nicotine and the cardiovascular system: Unmasking a global public health threat. European Heart Journal. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehaf1010. and Chen, D. T.-H., Grigg, J., & Filippidis, F. T. (2024). European Respiratory Society statement on novel nicotine and tobacco products, their role in tobacco control and “harm reduction”. European Respiratory Journal, 63(2), 2301808. https://doi.org/10.1183/13993003.01808-2023.

  3. Enmienda 91Aprobada

    Recital 4 a (new)

    Presentada por César Luena · S&D

    Añadido: (4a) The Union is a Party to the WHO Framework Convention on Tobacco Control. Article 5.3 of that Convention requires that, in setting and implementing tobacco control policies, Parties act to protect those policies from commercial and other vested interests of the tobacco industry. The legislative process leading to this Directive, including any delegated and implementing measures adopted pursuant to it, should be conducted in full compliance with that obligation. The use of studies, data or projections produced by or on behalf of tobacco industry actors should be treated with particular caution and should not, in itself, constitute a basis for reducing the ambition of minimum excise duty rates or extending transitional periods.

  4. Enmienda 92Rechazada

    Recital 15

    Presentada por César Luena · S&D

    … excise duty on cigarettes should include, in addition to a specific component Eliminado: calculated per unit of the product, Añadido: set at EUR 215 per 1000 cigarettes, a proportional component Eliminado: based on Añadido: set at 63 % of the retail selling price, inclusive of all taxes. The turnover tax on …

  5. Enmienda 93Rechazada

    Recital 18

    Presentada por César Luena · S&D

    Eliminado: (18) A certain degree of convergence would help ensure a high level of … the price of tobacco and tobacco related products, which in turn influences Eliminado: consumers’ Añadido: consumers' consumption habits. Fraud and smuggling undermine tax induced price levels, in particular … and thus jeopardise the achievement of tobacco control and health protection objectives. Añadido: The risk of illicit trade should not be invoked to justify the reduction or limitation of minimum excise duty rates. Empirical evidence consistently demonstrates that the primary drivers of illicit tobacco trade are weak enforcement capacity, organised crime, and gaps in customs cooperation rather than the level of taxation itself. The appropriate response to illicit trade is strengthened enforcement, enhanced cross-border cooperation between competent authorities, and investment in track-and-trace systems, not the suppression of legitimate public health taxation objectives. Member States and Union institutions should ensure that resources allocated to anti-smuggling measures are commensurate with the scale of the challenge, and that the Excise Movement and Control System (EMCS) and track-and-trace obligations under Directive 2014/40/EU are fully enforced.

  6. Enmienda 94Rechazada

    Article 12 – paragraph 3 a (new)

    Presentada por César Luena · S&D

    Añadido: 3a. The newly adjusted minimum tax level shall not be lower than the minimum excise duty applicable in the Member State immediately prior to the rate adjustment pursuant to paragraphs 2 and 3. Where the adjustment would result in a lower level, the minimum excise duty shall remain unchanged at its pre-adjustment level.

  7. Enmienda 95Rechazada

    Article 12 – paragraph 4

    Presentada por César Luena · S&D

    … 16, Article 20(2) and Article 22(2) and adjusted in accordance with paragraphs Eliminado: 2 and 3 Añadido: 2, 3 and 3a of this Article from the first day of the year following the …

  8. Enmienda 96Rechazada

    Article 12 – paragraph 4 a (new)

    Presentada por César Luena · S&D

    Añadido: 4a. The adjustment of minimum Union rates pursuant to this Article shall not be subject to any upper limit. Any cap on the periodic adjustment would risk reproducing the structural erosion of minimum rates that characterised the period of application of Directive 2011/64/EU, contrary to the public health and internal market objectives of this Directive.

Voto por grupo político

Cómo votaron los grupos políticos

Miembros

Mostrando 10 de 719

Posición de voto
NombrePaísGrupoPosición de voto
EsloveniaEPP
A favor
PoloniaEPP
A favor
AlemaniaEPP
A favor
ChequiaEPP
A favor
EspañaEPP
Voto previstoAbstenciónVoto emitido: A favor
CroaciaEPP
A favor
LituaniaEPP
A favor
PoloniaEPP
A favor
PoloniaECR
A favor
DinamarcaRenew
A favor
Mostrar más
Síguenos en Instagram@checksomevotes@checksomevotes_en