Votación en el Parlamento Europeo
INFORME sobre el estado de previsiones de ingresos y gastos del Parlamento Europeo para el ejercicio 2027
Fecha: 30.04.2026Referencia: A10-0124/2026Resultado general
Aprobada- 401 A favor
- 116 En contra
- 68 Abstención
- 134 No votó
Cómo contamos
- Los votos A favor, En contra y Abstención provienen del acta de votación nominal del Parlamento Europeo.
- «No ha votado» se deriva: eurodiputados con mandato el día de la votación para los que no se registró ningún voto. Las abstenciones no cuentan para esto.
- Las correcciones de voto posteriores se muestran pero no cambian el resultado oficial.
- Cada votación (votación global, enmienda, votación parcial) cuenta por separado. Por eso los totales pueden diferir de páginas que cuentan de forma distinta.
Estado y procedimiento
Resultado según el Parlamento Europeo.
- Votación celebrada el
- Último paso documentado
- Pleno · (hace 200 días)
- Próximo paso previsto
- La fuente no prevé ningún otro paso.
Desarrollo del procedimiento
2025/2247(BUI) · BUI
Actividades documentadas del procedimiento. No demuestran que una ley haya entrado en vigor.
- Documentado: Examen en comisión
- Último documentado: Pleno
Actividades documentadas (6)
- Presentación del informe en comisión
- Presentación de enmiendas en comisión
- Aprobación del informe en comisión
- Presentación al pleno
- Votación en el pleno
- Resultados de la votación en el pleno
Actividades previstas (realización no confirmada)
- Votación en el pleno
Ficha del procedimiento (OEIL) · Datos del Parlamento Europeo
Consultado:
Fuentes
Datos: EP Open Data API
¿De qué se trata?
- Presupuesto 2027 del Parlamento Europeo aprobado.
- 2.660 millones de euros de presupuesto total con 1,98 % de aumento respecto a 2026.
- Ciberseguridad y soberanía digital como prioridades.
Historial de enmiendas (11)
Texto tal como lo publica el PE, en inglés.
- Enmienda 1Aprobada
Paragraph 28
Presentada por Maria Ohisalo, Cristina Guarda, Estelle Ceulemans +39 · Members
28.
Eliminado: TakesAñadido: Expresses concern that the quality and continuity of services provided by Parliament’s Wayenberg Crèche have been affected by frequent changes of service providers since 2020, alongside challenges related to staff shortages, high staff absenteeism and staff turnover at the crèche; takes note of theEliminado: early terminationAñadido: award of the current contract for Parliament’s childcare services in Brussels to a new company established shortly after the publication of the tender and reportedly linked to the former provider, Esedra; recalls the early termination by the Parliament of the contract with the previous provider of the CrècheEliminado: WayenbergAñadido: Wayenberg, Esedra after a number of serious allegations againstEliminado: the formerAñadido: that contractor; reiterates that decent working conditions Añadido: and adequate pay for external staff,Eliminado: such asAñadido: including training, skills development, Añadido: measures against violence and harassment, meaningful social dialogue and investment in staff wellbeing should, where relevant, be a priority consideration in public procurement of Parliament as a matter of principle; Añadido: calls for an independent external audit of the tender procedure and of the implementation of the current contract, including an independent external assessment of working conditions and staff wellbeing; calls on the Bureau and the Secretary-General to reconsider the current outsourcing model for childcare services and to carry out a cost-benefit analysis of implementing the progressive internalisation of staff for pre-school childcare services, with a view to ensuring high-quality standards and long-term continuity of care. - Enmienda 1Rechazada
Paragraph 28
Presentada por Maria Ohisalo, Cristina Guarda, Estelle Ceulemans +39 · Members
28.
Eliminado: TakesAñadido: Expresses concern that the quality and continuity of services provided by Parliament’s Wayenberg Crèche have been affected by frequent changes of service providers since 2020, alongside challenges related to staff shortages, high staff absenteeism and staff turnover at the crèche; takes note of theEliminado: early terminationAñadido: award of the current contract for Parliament’s childcare services in Brussels to a new company established shortly after the publication of the tender and reportedly linked to the former provider, Esedra; recalls the early termination by the Parliament of the contract with the previous provider of the CrècheEliminado: WayenbergAñadido: Wayenberg, Esedra after a number of serious allegations againstEliminado: the formerAñadido: that contractor; reiterates that decent working conditions Añadido: and adequate pay for external staff,Eliminado: such asAñadido: including training, skills development, Añadido: measures against violence and harassment, meaningful social dialogue and investment in staff wellbeing should, where relevant, be a priority consideration in public procurement of Parliament as a matter of principle; Añadido: calls for an independent external audit of the tender procedure and of the implementation of the current contract, including an independent external assessment of working conditions and staff wellbeing; calls on the Bureau and the Secretary-General to reconsider the current outsourcing model for childcare services and to carry out a cost-benefit analysis of implementing the progressive internalisation of staff for pre-school childcare services, with a view to ensuring high-quality standards and long-term continuity of care. - Enmienda 2Rechazada
Paragraph 28 a (new)
Presentada por Cristina Guarda, Maria Ohisalo, Estelle Ceulemans +39 · Members
Añadido: 28a. Emphasises the need to ensure that Parliament’s crèche complies with the highest food safety standards; underlines that scientific evidence over the last ten years shows that infants and children are disproportionately exposed to the harmful effects of pesticides on their health and development, due to their higher intake relative to body weight and their developing physiology, including risks of cognitive impairments and developmental delays1; calls for consideration of the need for public procurement rules to include a requirement for the provision of 100% organic food, prioritising short supply chains and local suppliers, in order to reduce pesticide exposure and better protect children’s health and development. 1. Jiang B, et al. (2024), The effects of organic food on human health: a systematic review and meta-analysis of population-based studies. Nutr Rev., https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/37930102/; European Environment Agency (2024), How pesticides impact human health https://www.eea.europa.eu/en/analysis/publications/how-pesticides-impact-human-health
- Enmienda 3Rechazada
Paragraph 3 a (new)
Presentada por Manon Aubry · The Left
Añadido: 3a. Recalls that the daily allowance is a flat-rate sum covering accommodation, meals and related expenses each day that a Member is present at the European Parliament on official business; stresses that Members must sign an attendance register in order to benefit from the allowance; notes that there are exemptions for the President and the chairs of political groups who automatically benefit from it independently of their presence unless they explicitly request it; calls on Parliament to put an end to the exceptions for the President and the chairs of political groups, who should sign an attendance register like all other Members to benefit from their per-diem;
- Enmienda 4Rechazada
Paragraph 3 b (new)
Presentada por Manon Aubry, Marc Botenga · The Left
Añadido: 3b. Calls for an adjustment of the Statute for Members of the European Parliament to cut the basic monthly salaries of Members by 50 %.
- Enmienda 7Rechazada
Paragraph 32 a (new)
Presentada por Manon Aubry, Marc Botenga · The Left
Añadido: 32a. Calls for the dissolution of the optional pension scheme for Members;
- Enmienda 9Rechazada
Paragraph 8 a (new)
Presentada por Jorge Buxadé Villalba, Julien Sanchez, Angéline Furet +1 · PfE
Añadido: 8 a. Underlines that the current financial circumstances affecting the Union budget, including Parliament’s budget, should be resolved through increased fiscal responsibility in the form of enhanced efficiency in respect of already assigned funds at all levels of implementation, as opposed to the creation of new own resources or increase in GNI contributions; condemns ongoing Union strategies which aim at introducing new costs and taxes to consumers in order to cover the ever-increasing expenses of the Union’s many agencies, institutions, funds and finance schemes;
- Enmienda 10Rechazada
Paragraph 16
Presentada por Julien Sanchez, Jorge Buxadé Villalba, Angéline Furet +1 · PfE
Eliminado: 16.Takes note that the SPAAK building renovation starts to be carried out as of 2027; takesAñadido: 16. Takes note that the overall budget for the renovation Añadido: of the Spaak building has been set at EUR 455 million and that EUR 77,67 million … to ensure strict cost control, transparency and adherence to the planned budget; Añadido: is sceptical that the renovation of a single, already fully functioning building, should cost close to EUR 0,5 billion; demands a reduction in the costs of this undertaking; demands full transparency and the tracking of all expenses related to this undertaking to ensure accountability for those responsible for potential financial irregularities; expresses concern at the absence of a detailed breakdown of costs for the planned renovation of the Spaak building, decided by the Bureau of the European Parliament; underlines that such a lack of transparency is particularly problematic for a project of this scale and raises concerns about possible cost overruns, especially in light of those observed in several previous European construction projects, such as Berlaymont, the Europa building, the Court of Justice, EMA, KAD II; - Enmienda 13Rechazada
Paragraph 25
Presentada por Jorge Buxadé Villalba · PfE
25.
Eliminado: Takes note of the significant increases of theAñadido: Underlines the significant increase in carbon credit prices which at current emission levels would need an estimated EUR 950 000 for 2027;Eliminado: calls on the administration to give priority toAñadido: highlights that this cost reflects the ongoing surge in ETS prices, which are becoming unsurmountable for key sectors such as metallurgy and fertilizer production; remarks that the difficulties associated with decreasing Parliament’s emissionsEliminado: including by increased investments in clean heating, ventilation, and air conditioning systems, notably heat pump installations in Brussels and other proportionate and cost-effective measures to lower emissions where reasonable, over buying carbon credits; welcomes the introduction of an enhanced train offer for missions to Strasbourg as of June 2025, as a positive step towards reducing CO2 emissions;Añadido: are insignificant compared to the expenses and other realities involved in reducing emissions in sectors with hard to abate emissions; calls, in the context of the ETS revision during the third quarter of 2026, for in depth impact assessments of the effect of ETS and its relevant phase-out targets on key sectors, as well as the adjustment of said targets in order to safeguard key national industries; - Enmienda 15Aprobada
Paragraph 27 a (new)
Presentada por Sandra Gómez López · S&D
Añadido: 27a. Welcomes the recent initiatives endorsed by the Conference of Presidents and the Bureau to allow Members in the perinatal period to vote by proxy, recognising this as a positive step towards greater inclusiveness in parliamentary work and calls on all parties to swiftly implement the measure; insists, however, that the measure falls short of Parliament’s repeated calls to ensure voting rights not just for Members in the perinatal period, but also for Members on parental or paternity leave or facing certified long-term illness;
- Enmienda 15Aprobada
Paragraph 27 a (new)
Presentada por Sandra Gómez López · S&D
Añadido: 27a. Welcomes the recent initiatives endorsed by the Conference of Presidents and the Bureau to allow Members in the perinatal period to vote by proxy, recognising this as a positive step towards greater inclusiveness in parliamentary work and calls on all parties to swiftly implement the measure; insists, however, that the measure falls short of Parliament’s repeated calls to ensure voting rights not just for Members in the perinatal period, but also for Members on parental or paternity leave or facing certified long-term illness;
Voto por grupo político
Cómo votaron los grupos políticos
- 60A favor
- 0En contra
- 5Abstención
- 12No votó
- 136A favor
- 1En contra
- 0Abstención
- 48No votó
- 113A favor
- 0En contra
- 0Abstención
- 22No votó
- 45A favor
- 0En contra
- 0Abstención
- 8No votó
- 7A favor
- 13En contra
- 7Abstención
- 3No votó
- 32A favor
- 9En contra
- 27Abstención
- 13No votó
- 1A favor
- 68En contra
- 2Abstención
- 14No votó
- 6A favor
- 2En contra
- 27Abstención
- 11No votó
- 1A favor
- 23En contra
- 0Abstención
- 3No votó
Miembros
Mostrando 10 de 719
| Nombre | País | Grupo | Posición de voto |
|---|---|---|---|
A favor | |||
A favor | |||
A favor | |||
A favor | |||
A favor | |||
A favor | |||
A favor | |||
A favor | |||
A favor | |||
A favor |