Situación de los derechos fundamentales en la Unión Europea en 2024 y 2025

Texto tal como lo publica el PE, en inglés.

1. Enmienda 2Rechazada

   Recital BE a (new)

   Presentada por Pernando Barrena Arza, Rima Hassan, Isabel Serra Sánchez +2 · The Left

   Añadido: BEa. whereas any definition of antisemitism should make a clear distinction between a direct or indirect call for, or justification of, violence, hatred or intolerance towards Jewish people, and a criticism of the actions of the State of Israel;

2. Enmienda 3Aprobada

   Paragraph 26 a (new)

   Presentada por Jonas Sjöstedt, Hanna Gedin, Isabel Serra Sánchez +1 · The Left

   Añadido: 26a. Recalls several cases in which journalists with EU citizenship have been detained on spurious charges while carrying out their professional duties in non-EU countries, including candidate countries; urges the Commission and the Member States, in line with Commission Recommendation (EU) 2022/758, to increase their efforts to assist with the release and safe return of these arbitrarily detained journalists; calls on the Commission to pay particular attention to cases of unjustified detention of journalists in candidate countries, including Türkiye, and to the legal proceedings against Swedish journalist Joakim Medin;

3. Enmienda 4Rechazada

   Paragraph 46

   Presentada por Jonas Sjöstedt, Hanna Gedin, Isabel Serra Sánchez +2 · The Left

   … to take into account the situation and specific needs of vulnerable groups; Añadido: expresses deep concern regarding the return by some Member States of children, including babies, or young people who have developed strong ties to the society they live in, in many cases resulting in their separation from their parents, in violation of the right to respect for family life; calls for the establishment of a mechanism to monitor compliance with these …

4. Enmienda 5Aprobada

   Paragraph 72 a (new)

   Presentada por Jonas Sjöstedt, Hanna Gedin, Isabel Serra Sánchez +2 · The Left

   Añadido: 72a. Recalls the body of documents published in connection with the convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein, which indicates that countless crimes have been committed and, consequently, that there is a large group of hidden perpetrators; notes that it is well documented that Epstein had a network extending deep into the corridors of power across Europe, including royalty, top diplomats and politicians; condemns the fact that it has not yet been established how many, and which, members of this network were aware of or involved in human trafficking, the sexual exploitation of children, fraud and financial crime; stresses not only that it is seriously concerning that these individuals remain at large, but also that the lack of full accountability undermines the rule of law and public trust in democratic institutions; stresses that cases involving cross-border elements within the EU should be addressed at EU level; questions the EU’s ability to investigate, prevent and combat complex cross-border crime committed by society’s elites; urges the Commission to promptly task the EU’s expert centre for crime prevention (Europol), together with the European Anti-Fraud Office and national authorities, to investigate and analyse the nature of this criminal activity, as well as to identify those who can be held accountable;

5. Enmienda 6Rechazada

   Paragraph 86 a (new)

   Presentada por Pernando Barrena Arza, Rima Hassan, Isabel Serra Sánchez +2 · The Left

   Añadido: 86a. Is concerned by counter-terrorism policies that have led to discrimination and hostility against certain groups, including communities of colour, Muslim communities, and anti-racism movements, activists and organisations; denounces the fact that the effect of such policies includes the delegitimisation and, in some instances, criminalisation, or attempted criminalisation, of political, religious and other discourses, discriminatory legal and law enforcement practices, including racial and religious profiling, shrinking civil society space, self-censorship of civil society’s political views and a suppression of open and free political debate; calls on the Member States to refrain from such practices or from adopting policies and legislation that could lead to such consequences for these communities;

6. Enmienda 7Rechazada

   Paragraph 87 a (new)

   Presentada por Pernando Barrena Arza, Rima Hassan, Isabel Serra Sánchez +2 · The Left

   Añadido: 87a. Strongly denounces the fact that the right to peaceful protest has been repeatedly threatened and violated across the EU, particularly in regard to climate activists and pro-Palestinian rights and anti-genocide demonstrators;

7. Enmienda 8Rechazada

   Paragraph 87 b (new)

   Presentada por Pernando Barrena Arza, Rima Hassan, Isabel Serra Sánchez +2 · The Left

   Añadido: 87b. Strongly condemns the fact that in many Member States, authorities have enforced disproportionate measures, such as pre-emptive banning of public gatherings in solidarity with Palestine, based on risk to ‘public order’ and ‘security’; condemns, furthermore, the use of excessive force and violence by authorities, the detention of protesters and the conflation of criticism of Israeli authorities with antisemitism, leading to a chilling effect and an atmosphere of repression; stresses that, in several cases, the bans have been appealed against, and courts have intervened against banning protests in solidarity with Palestine; condemns, at the highest political level, unlawful restrictions on the right to freedom of peaceful assembly and expression;

8. Enmienda 10Aprobada

   Recital G b (new)

   Presentada por Giuseppe Antoci, Jonas Sjöstedt, Hanna Ghedin · The Left

   Añadido: Gb. whereas organised crime poses a serious threat to fundamental rights and the functioning of the rule of law in several Member States; whereas the experience of some Member States has shown the effectiveness of specific preventive mechanisms designed to stop organised crime infiltrating public procurement processes and the management of EU funds by requiring that anti-mafia checks be conducted prior to access being granted to public grants and concessions; whereas the introduction of such preventive mechanisms across the EU would help to protect the integrity of EU funds, uphold the fundamental rights of the communities impacted by organised crime and strengthen citizens’ trust in public institutions;

9. Enmienda 11Rechazada

   Recital L a (new)

   Presentada por Gaetano Pedullà · The Left

   Añadido: La. whereas in several Member States clear conflicts of interest exist between ownership of large media groups and the exercise of political governing functions, and whereas these situations undermine editorial independence, distort public debate and prejudice citizens’ right to pluralistic and unbiased information; whereas such conflicts of interest, where not properly regulated and penalised, enable those who hold political power to use their media assets to influence public opinion for their own benefit, thereby undermining the foundations of healthy democracy; whereas the European Media Freedom Act imposes transparency and incompatibility measures in this regard and these must be fully and strictly enforced;

10. Enmienda 13Rechazada

    Recital M

    Presentada por Gaetano Pedullà · The Left

    … European Media Freedom Act entered fully into force on 8 August 2025; Añadido: whereas, however, several Member States are still not ensuring its full and correct implementation, particularly as regards governance structures being independent from scrutiny by the executive power and the prohibition of political interference in the editorial decisions of public service media; whereas the failure to implement European media freedom standards is intolerable and should result in the systematic launch of infringement proceedings by the Commission; whereas in several Member States, journalists and media workers have been subjected …

11. Enmienda 16Rechazada

    Paragraph 15 b (new)

    Presentada por Giuseppe Antoci · The Left

    Añadido: 15b. Calls on the Commission to introduce European preventive mechanisms to make access to EU funds conditional on prior checks on the absence of connections to organised crime, extending this approach to all public and private entities that are beneficiaries of EU-financed contracts, concessions and contributions; calls for these mechanisms to be incorporated into the Rule of Law Conditionality Regulation and the Common Provisions Regulation so that protecting EU funds from infiltration by criminal organisations becomes a systematic cross-cutting requirement;

12. Enmienda 16Rechazada

    Paragraph 15 b (new)

    Presentada por Giuseppe Antoci · The Left

    Añadido: 15b. Calls on the Commission to introduce European preventive mechanisms to make access to EU funds conditional on prior checks on the absence of connections to organised crime, extending this approach to all public and private entities that are beneficiaries of EU-financed contracts, concessions and contributions; calls for these mechanisms to be incorporated into the Rule of Law Conditionality Regulation and the Common Provisions Regulation so that protecting EU funds from infiltration by criminal organisations becomes a systematic cross-cutting requirement;

13. Enmienda 17Rechazada

    Paragraph 21 a (new)

    Presentada por Gaetano Pedullà · The Left

    Añadido: 21a. Condemns the conflicts of interest between ownership/control of large media groups and the exercise of governing functions or political representation, which besides violating transparency and incompatibility rules, concretely prejudice the fundamental right of citizens to free and pluralistic information; calls on the Commission to ensure that the European Media Freedom Act is enforced in such a way to effectively prevent and penalise such situations, including through the mandatory divestment of media assets for major public office holders, and to systematically check that media ownership structures comply with EU rules on conflicts of interest;

14. Enmienda 20Rechazada

    Paragraph 33 a (new)

    Presentada por Gaetano Pedullà · The Left

    Añadido: 33a. Calls on the Commission and the Member States to take urgent measures to prevent and sanction social media interference in the democratic and electoral process, paying particular attention to the profiling of individuals for the purpose of political targeting, to the use of algorithms that amplify divisive content during election campaigns and to the use of recommender systems that limit the diversity of political information that reaches voters; calls for the Transparency and Targeting of Political Advertising Regulation to be rigorously and promptly enforced, including requirements for independent audits of platforms’ algorithms during election periods; calls, further, for a ban on political microtargeting based on sensitive personal data and for every member of the public to be guaranteed access to pluralistic political information that has not been filtered in an opaque manner by platforms’ algorithms;

15. Enmienda 22Rechazada

    Paragraph 1 a (new)

    Presentada por Marieke Ehlers, Mieke Andriese, António Tânger Corrêa +1 · PfE

    Añadido: 1a. Recalls that the Member States remain the masters of the Treaties and that the EU can only act in accordance with the principle of conferral;

16. Enmienda 23Rechazada

    Paragraph 2 a (new)

    Presentada por Marieke Ehlers, Mieke Andriese, António Tânger Corrêa +1 · PfE

    Añadido: 2a. Recalls that fundamental rights are best protected at national level, where they are grounded in the specific legal frameworks of each Member State; rejects the increasing tendency of the EU to use fundamental rights as a tool for legal activism to interfere in areas of exclusive national competence, such as healthcare, education, and the organisation of the judiciary; reiterates that the principle of subsidiarity is not a suggestion but a treaty-based obligation;

17. Enmienda 25Rechazada

    Paragraph 11 a (new)

    Presentada por Marieke Ehlers, Mieke Andriese, António Tânger Corrêa +1 · PfE

    Añadido: 11a. Welcomes the letter sent by several Member States expressing concerns regarding the evolving jurisprudence of the ECtHR, in particular as regards the perceived expansion of its interpretative approach beyond the original intent of the European Convention on Human Rights; underlines the importance of maintaining a balanced relationship between the ECtHR and the Member States, fully respecting the principle of subsidiarity and the margin of appreciation afforded to national authorities; stresses that the legitimacy and effectiveness of the ECtHR depend on its continued adherence to its mandate as defined by the Convention and the consent of the High Contracting Parties;

18. Enmienda 26Rechazada

    Paragraph 15

    Presentada por Jorge Buxadé Villalba, Afroditi Latinopoulou, António Tânger Corrêa · PfE

    … States and the emergence of corruption cases involving high-level officials and politicians; Añadido: regrets the lack of cooperation between public institutions and judicial authorities in investigations involving government activities in some Member States, such as the removal of key physical evidence without judicial authorisation in the investigation into the high-speed train collision in Adamuz, Spain, as well as the investigation process regarding the Tempi train collision in Greece; urges the Member States to combat corruption and to fully comply with …

19. Enmienda 27Rechazada

    Paragraph 20 a (new)

    Presentada por Marieke Ehlers, Mieke Andriese, António Tânger Corrêa +1 · PfE

    Añadido: 20a. Expresses grave concern regarding the weaponisation of fundamental rights to curtail the freedom of expression and warns against the EU constructing a centralised censorship apparatus under the guise of combating ‘disinformation’ and ‘hate speech’;

20. Enmienda 28Rechazada

    Paragraph 30

    Presentada por Marieke Ehlers, Mieke Andriese, António Tânger Corrêa +1 · PfE

    30. Eliminado: Highlights Añadido: Recalls that organising national elections is a Member State competence; highlights the growing trend of election manipulation in the EU by both domestic and foreign Eliminado: actors; Añadido: actors, including EU institutions; calls on the Commission to carry out regular specific analyses of the …

21. Enmienda 30Rechazada

    Paragraph 31 a (new)

    Presentada por Marieke Ehlers, Mieke Andriese, António Tânger Corrêa +1 · PfE

    Añadido: 31a. Notes with concern that the concepts of ‘misinformation’ and ‘disinformation’ lack a clear, universally agreed and objective legal definition; emphasises the fundamental legal principle of lex certa, which requires any restriction on the freedom of expression, as protected by Article 11 of the Charter, to be prescribed by law with absolute clarity and precision; warns that empowering governments or EU bodies to regulate poorly defined and inherently subjective concepts risks creating a chilling effect on legitimate political discourse and lays the groundwork for arbitrary censorship;

22. Enmienda 32Rechazada

    Paragraph 45

    Presentada por Marieke Ehlers, António Tânger Corrêa, Afroditi Latinopoulou · PfE

    45. Recalls that the Eliminado: new legislative framework under the EU Pact on Migration and Asylum establishes revised rules for asylum procedures, border management and solidarity; underlines that its effective implementation requires full respect for fundamental rights; highlights that respect for fundamental rights must continue to be closely monitored; Añadido: EU has, first and foremost, a duty to protect the fundamental rights of the citizens of the Member States; recalls, in this regard, that the EU’s migration policies should be aimed primarily at establishing the effective protection of national borders and ensuring the safety of European societies;

23. Enmienda 33Rechazada

    Paragraph 50

    Presentada por Marieke Ehlers, António Tânger Corrêa, Afroditi Latinopoulou · PfE

    50. Eliminado: Urges the Commission and the Member States to end the systematic obstruction of non-governmental SAR efforts; recalls the urgent need to set up an EU search and rescue fund, and calls for the EU institutions to allocate appropriate funding for this purpose in the next MFF; Añadido: Emphasises that non-governmental organisations acting as a shuttle service in the Mediterranean create additional pull factors for people to risk their lives, and those of their children, to come to Europe for better economic opportunities, even if their chances of being granted asylum are extremely slim at best; reiterates that the rights of migrants have to be balanced with the rights of Europeans, specifically regarding their safety and security;

24. Enmienda 34Rechazada

    Paragraph 66 a (new)

    Presentada por Marieke Ehlers, Mieke Andriese, António Tânger Corrêa +1 · PfE

    Añadido: 66a. Recalls that the ECtHR has explicitly confirmed that the right to freedom of expression protects speech that may offend, shock or disturb; warns against the increasing political and institutional tendency to weaponise subjective concepts such as ‘hate speech’ to silence dissenting, unpopular or provocative political discourse;

25. Enmienda 39Rechazada

    Paragraph 3 a (new)

    Presentada por Paolo Inselvini, Stephen Nikola Bartulica, Nicolas Bay +5 · ECR

    Añadido: 3a. Recalls that discrimination based on sex and other grounds is prohibited under Article 21 of the Charter; expresses serious concern about the erosion of the meaning of fundamental rights and gender equality; calls on the Commission and the Member States to refrain from adopting the narrative of gender ideology and the LGBTIQ+ lobby, aimed at eliminating sex-based rights, language and legal categories in law and policy; warns against the risk of classifying highly controversial issues as fundamental rights, such as surrogacy or so-called gender-affirming interventions without age limits, and underlines the need to act, in this regard, in full respect of the Treaties and the principle of subsidiarity;

26. Enmienda 40Rechazada

    Paragraph 4 a (new)

    Presentada por Paolo Inselvini, Stephen Nikola Bartulica, Nicolas Bay +5 · ECR

    Añadido: 4a. Underlines that parents or legal guardians have the primary responsibility for the upbringing and development of their children, particularly regarding sensitive areas such as sexuality and relationships education; emphasises the importance of ensuring the right of parents to be fully informed, and to exercise an informed choice, regarding the participation of their children in such programmes, in full respect of the competences of the Member States in the field of education;

27. Enmienda 43Rechazada

    Paragraph 53 a (new)

    Presentada por Paolo Inselvini, Stephen Nikola Bartulica, Nicolas Bay +5 · ECR

    Añadido: 53a. Underlines that the practice of surrogacy is increasing on a global level and also within the EU, and raises serious ethical and legal concerns, as it risks reducing the child to an object of transaction and instrumentalising the body of the woman; reiterates that, in accordance with the principle of the best interests of the child, all Member States are required to ensure the full protection of the rights of children and to prevent any form of exploitation; recalls the condemnation of surrogacy expressed by the European Parliament in its resolution on the EU Gender Equality Strategy 20251a, and calls on the Commission and the Member States to counter the practice of surrogacy in all its forms; expresses concern about legislative initiatives that could contribute, even indirectly, to the normalisation or recognition of surrogacy between Member States, in particular the Commission proposal for a Council regulation on jurisdiction, applicable law, recognition of decisions and acceptance of authentic instruments in matters of parenthood and on the creation of a European Certificate of Parenthood (COM(2022)0695), and calls on the EU institutions to ensure that no EU legal act entails the recognition of situations arising from such practices, which are in violation of human dignity and the rights of the child; ____________________ 1a Texts adopted, P10_TA(2025)0278.

28. Enmienda 44Rechazada

    Paragraph 71 a (new)

    Presentada por Paolo Inselvini, Stephen Nikola Bartulica, Nicolas Bay +5 · ECR

    Añadido: 71a. Underlines that healthcare policies must be grounded in respect for the intrinsic dignity of every human being; highlights the importance of respecting the right to conscientious objection, in accordance with national legal frameworks; calls for the promotion of healthcare approaches that take into account the protection of human life from conception and the well-being of both the mother and the child, in full respect of the competences of the Member States in the field of health;

29. Enmienda 46Rechazada

    Paragraph 107 b (new)

    Presentada por Paolo Inselvini, Geadis Geadi, Stephen Nikola Bartulica +5 · ECR

    Añadido: 107b. Calls on the Commission and the Member States to develop a common definition to recognise and address anti-Christian hatred, including through the establishment of the term ‘Christianophobia’ in EU monitoring, reporting and policy instruments on hate crime and discrimination; strongly condemns all forms of anti-Christian hatred and discrimination across the EU and notes with deep concern that, according to data from the Organization for Security and Co-operation in Europe, thousands of anti-Christian incidents are reported annually in Europe; calls for improved data collection and the effective prosecution of such crimes; further calls on the Commission to establish a coordinator for attacks and discrimination against Christians, in particular in light of recent attacks against Christian communities, priests, cemeteries and places of worship in Europe, in order to ensure a balanced approach alongside existing coordinators addressing other forms of religious discrimination;

30. Enmienda 47Rechazada

    Recital P a (new)

    Presentada por Sarah Knafo · ESN

    Añadido: Pa. whereas any regulatory action in this area must strictly respect freedom of expression, media pluralism and the free formation of opinions, and must not lead to censorship or undue political interference in public debate; whereas primary responsibility for regulating public discourse remains with the Member States in accordance with the principle of subsidiarity;

31. Enmienda 48Rechazada

    Recital S

    Presentada por Sarah Knafo · ESN

    … rights and should be subject to strict safeguards and clear legal frameworks; Añadido: whereas such frameworks should remain proportionate and innovation-friendly in order not to hinder technological development, economic competitiveness and the Union’s strategic autonomy; whereas fostering the emergence of European AI actors is essential to strengthening technological sovereignty;

32. Enmienda 49Rechazada

    Recital AG

    Presentada por Milan Uhrík · ESN

    AG. whereas certain Member States’ Añadido: benevolent responses to irregular migration risk undermining fundamental Eliminado: rights and may perpetuate racialised narratives; whereas the EU and the Member States should ensure Añadido: rights, safety and the protection of the lives of Eliminado: refugees and migrants and take credible steps to deliver accountability for violations; Añadido: their own citizens;

33. Enmienda 50Rechazada

    Paragraph 5 a (new)

    Presentada por Christine Anderson, Mary Khan, Milan Uhrík · ESN

    Añadido: 5a. Strongly condemns the lack of transparency at the highest levels of the European Commission, notably in relation to President Ursula von der Leyen and Pfizergate; recalls the 2025 CJEU judgment finding a breach of EU transparency rules regarding access to text messages linked to COVID-19 vaccine negotiations; calls on the Commission to ensure full transparency in COVID-19 vaccine procurement by disclosing all relevant communications without undue delay; notes the ongoing investigation of the European Public Prosecutor’s Office and calls for its swift and transparent conclusion;

34. Enmienda 51Rechazada

    Paragraph 6 a (new)

    Presentada por Milan Uhrík, Mary Khan · ESN

    Añadido: 6a. Deplores the growing wave of violence and disorder by far-left extremist groups, which is often downplayed or ignored; condemns in the strongest terms the attacks on ordinary citizens, the police, public property and critical infrastructure carried out in the name of radical ideologies; declares Antifa to be a terrorist organisation posing a direct threat to European security and welcomes initiatives in Member States to classify it as such; calls on the Council to add Antifa to the EU terrorist list;

35. Enmienda 52Rechazada

    Paragraph 10 a (new)

    Presentada por Mary Khan, Milan Uhrík, Christine Anderson · ESN

    Añadido: 10a. Strongly condemns the growing practice of ‘debanking’, whereby individuals and organisations are denied access to their payment accounts or have them terminated without credible, transparent or proportionate justification; considers that such practices are often initiated on the basis of opaque risk assessments or for political and reputational considerations; stresses that access to payment accounts constitutes a fundamental prerequisite for participating in economic and social life; calls on the Member States to put in place robust safeguards to prevent such abuses, ensure full transparency of decision-making and guarantee effective remedies;

36. Enmienda 53Rechazada

    Paragraph 33 a (new)

    Presentada por Sarah Knafo · ESN

    Añadido: 33a. Emphasises that the implementation and enforcement of this regulation must fully respect the freedom of expression, media pluralism and the freedom of opinion, and must not result in disproportionate restrictions or indirect censorship of lawful content, including content that may be controversial, dissenting, or challenging to prevailing views in democratic debate;

37. Enmienda 54Rechazada

    Paragraph 45 a (new)

    Presentada por Milan Uhrík, Mary Khan, Sarah Knafo · ESN

    Añadido: 45a. Welcomes the progress made on the returns regulation towards establishing a legal framework for return hubs in third countries;

38. Enmienda 55Rechazada

    Paragraph 46 a (new)

    Presentada por Milan Uhrík, Mary Khan · ESN

    Añadido: 46a. Reaffirms the sovereign right of the Member States to control their external borders and to determine their own migration policies in accordance with their national interests;

39. Enmienda 56Rechazada

    Paragraph 59 a (new)

    Presentada por Mary Khan, Milan Uhrík · ESN

    Añadido: 59a. Underlines that matters relating to family law, legal gender recognition and civil status remain within the competence of the Member States, in accordance with their constitutional traditions and national legal systems;

40. Enmienda 57Rechazada

    Paragraph 67 a (new)

    Presentada por Mary Khan, Milan Uhrík · ESN

    Añadido: 67a. Expresses grave concern that the fundamental right to freedom of expression is increasingly being eroded under the guise of combating disinformation and alleged harmful content, leading to censorship and the silencing of legitimate public debate; stresses that in a true democracy, citizens must be free to express dissenting, controversial or unpopular views without fear of suppression or reprisal; recalls that freedom of speech is not a privilege granted by authorities, but a core right that must be robustly defended;

41. Enmienda 58Rechazada

    Paragraph 69

    Presentada por Mary Khan, Milan Uhrík · ESN

    69. Eliminado: Calls on the Commission to promote comprehensive, age-appropriate Añadido: Reaffirms that education policy, including the content and organisation of sexuality and relationship Eliminado: education in schools to counter gender-related misinformation and disinformation and to address gender stereotypes; Añadido: education, falls within the exclusive competence of the Member States;

42. Enmienda 59Rechazada

    Paragraph 122

    Presentada por Mary Khan, Milan Uhrík · ESN

    122. Recalls that the Eliminado: foundations of the EU project included the well-being of people as a pillar and considers that, regardless of any geopolitical, security and socioeconomic challenges, the EU cannot disregard the social and fundamental rights dimensions on which it was built; requests that the Commission duly take into account the well-being of individuals, including the most vulnerable, in all existing and upcoming EU policies, and to include food and health security in its political security agenda; Añadido: well-being of Europe’s peoples is the sole responsibility of sovereign Member States and firmly rejects any further encroachment by EU institutions into areas such as social policy, health and welfare; calls on the Commission to cease competence creep, to strictly respect subsidiarity and to leave such matters to be determined at national level in line with each country’s own priorities and democratic will;

43. Enmienda 60Rechazada

    Paragraph 122 a (new)

    Presentada por Sarah Knafo, Christine Anderson · ESN

    Añadido: 122a. Opposes any measures aimed at restricting or prohibiting access to social media and websites through mandatory age verification or identity verification requirements; rejects, in particular, the deployment of digital ID-based systems, such as mobile applications, enabling the generalised identification of users online, in the light of the disproportionate risks such mechanisms pose to fundamental rights, notably the right to privacy and freedom of expression; stresses that the protection of minors should primarily rely on parental authority and appropriate control tools, rather than on broad state surveillance mechanisms;

44. Enmienda 61Rechazada

    Paragraph 10 a (new)

    Presentada por Nicolas Bay, Marion Maréchal, Laurence Trochu +1 · ECR

    Añadido: 10a. Recalls that freedom of religion or belief includes the freedom to change one’s religion or belief or to have none, as recognised in Article 10 of the Charter and Article 18 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights; calls on the Commission and the Member States to ensure that individuals in the EU are fully protected from intimidation, violence or coercion linked to the exercise of this freedom;

45. Enmienda 62Rechazada

    Paragraph 12 a (new)

    Presentada por Nicolas Bay, Paolo Inselvini, Geadis Geadi +11 · ECR

    Añadido: 12a. Acknowledges the legitimate efforts of certain Member States to protect traditional family values and national identity and to safeguard minors against ideological propaganda, in full conformity with Article 4(2) TEU;

46. Enmienda 63Rechazada

    Paragraph 40 a (new)

    Presentada por Nicolas Bay, Paolo Inselvini, Geadis Geadi +11 · ECR

    Añadido: 40a. Underlines that freedom of expression, as protected by Article 11 of the Charter, includes the right to criticise migration policies, gender ideology and woke activism without that criticism being labelled as hate speech or disinformation;

47. Enmienda 64Rechazada

    Paragraph 40 b (new)

    Presentada por Nicolas Bay, Paolo Inselvini, Geadis Geadi +11 · ECR

    Añadido: 40b. Underlines that freedom of expression, as a cornerstone of democracy protected by Article 11 of the Charter, must not be unduly restricted by excessive enforcement of the Digital Services Act or platforms’ content moderation policies that risk repressing legitimate political debate;

48. Enmienda 65Rechazada

    Paragraph 40 c (new)

    Presentada por Nicolas Bay, Marion Maréchal, Laurence Trochu +1 · ECR

    Añadido: 40c. Recalls that Article 14 of the Charter guarantees the freedom to found educational establishments and the right of parents to ensure the education and teaching of their children is in conformity with their religious, philosophical and pedagogical convictions; calls on the Commission and the Member States to respect educational pluralism and the diversity of education systems across the EU;

49. Enmienda 66Rechazada

    Paragraph 51 a (new)

    Presentada por Nicolas Bay · ECR

    Añadido: 51a. Insists that the Member States have the sovereign right to effectively control their external borders, to refuse asylum and to return persons staying illegally; condemns the instrumentalisation of asylum procedures by smugglers and certain non-governmental organisations;

50. Enmienda 67Rechazada

    Recital H

    Presentada por Mariusz Kamiński · ECR

    … career of law enforcement personnel, particularly for top management positions, remain problematic; Añadido: whereas in some of the Member States, instead of combating corruption, the authorities weaken the independence and specialisation of anti-corruption agencies, and prosecute officials responsible for fighting corruption at the highest level, while at the same time undermining the very foundations of anti-corruption policy, as illustrated by cases of high level officials, including the Minister for Justice of Poland, who refuses to disclose his extensive assets, and is personally involved in pursuing state officials who in the past investigated irregularities in his asset declarations;

51. Enmienda 68Rechazada

    Paragraph 5 a (new)

    Presentada por Mariusz Kamiński · ECR

    Añadido: 5a. Considers it unacceptable, both morally and legally, that certain countries grant special privileges, including pensions, to members of criminal organisations from the period of totalitarian regimes, including the Nazi SS and communist security services; calls for an end to these disgraceful practices of financially privileging perpetrators, which directly undermine the dignity of victims, and for the allocation of funds to commemorate the victims of these regimes, and to ensure appropriate redress for them;

52. Enmienda 69Rechazada

    Paragraph 49 a (new)

    Presentada por Mariusz Kamiński · ECR

    Añadido: 49a. Strongly condemns the increasing violence against police officers, border guards and other law enforcement personnel, including in the line of duty and while participating in operations aimed at countering hybrid attacks against the EU, such as the weaponisation of migration; notes with deep concern that such violence has led to the death of a Polish soldier on the border with Belarus, and to serious injuries to other law enforcement personnel; calls for enhanced support and protection for such personnel in the performance of their duties to the state and society;