Votación en el Parlamento Europeo
INFORME sobre el Informe anual relativo a las actividades del Defensor del Pueblo Europeo en 2024
Fecha: 12.03.2026Referencia: A10-0015/2026Resultado general
Rechazada- 233 A favor
- 250 En contra
- 76 Abstención
- 159 No votó
Cómo contamos
- Los votos A favor, En contra y Abstención provienen del acta de votación nominal del Parlamento Europeo.
- «No ha votado» se deriva: eurodiputados con mandato el día de la votación para los que no se registró ningún voto. Las abstenciones no cuentan para esto.
- Las correcciones de voto posteriores se muestran pero no cambian el resultado oficial.
- Cada votación (votación global, enmienda, votación parcial) cuenta por separado. Por eso los totales pueden diferir de páginas que cuentan de forma distinta.
Estado y procedimiento
Resultado según el Parlamento Europeo.
- Votación celebrada el
- Último paso documentado
- Pleno · (hace 269 días)
- Próximo paso previsto
- La fuente no prevé ningún otro paso.
Desarrollo del procedimiento
2025/2138(INI) · INI
Actividades documentadas del procedimiento. No demuestran que una ley haya entrado en vigor.
- Documentado: Remisión
- Documentado: Examen en comisión
- Último documentado: Pleno
Actividades documentadas (17)
- Remisión a comisión
- Presentación del informe en comisión
- Presentación de enmiendas en comisión
- Presentación de enmiendas en comisión
- Aprobación del informe en comisión
- Presentación al pleno
- Presentación al pleno
- Presentación al pleno
- Presentación al pleno
- Presentación al pleno
- Presentación al pleno
- Presentación al pleno
- Presentación al pleno
- Presentación al pleno
- Debate en el pleno
- Votación en el pleno
- Resultados de la votación en el pleno
Actividades previstas (realización no confirmada)
- Debate en el pleno
- Votación en el pleno
Ficha del procedimiento (OEIL) · Datos del Parlamento Europeo
Consultado:
Fuentes
Datos: EP Open Data API
¿De qué se trata?
- Aprobación del informe anual 2024 del Defensor del Pueblo Europeo.
- Enfoque en la transparencia y derechos fundamentales en decisiones de la UE.
- Crítica por retrasos en el acceso a documentos .
Historial de enmiendas (14)
Texto tal como lo publica el PE, en inglés.
- Enmienda 15Rechazada
Paragraph 12
Presentada por Cristina Guarda · Verts/ALE
Eliminado: 12. Calls on the Ombudsman to examine the Commission’s practice of financing environmental non-governmental organisations that subsequently lobby Parliament and the Commission to further green policies; stresses that such practices risk creating conflicts of interest, distort the democratic process and undermine the legitimacy of EU decision-making;Añadido: deleted - Enmienda 17Rechazada
Paragraph 16
Presentada por Cristina Guarda · Verts/ALE
16. Stresses that Frontex must operate
Eliminado: within the provisions enshrined in its regulation5 , including theAñadido: in line with its obligations related to fundamentalEliminado: rights andAñadido: and human rights and in compliance with relevant internationalEliminado: law; takes note of the reform of the Frontex mandate announced by the President of the Commission for 2026; expects that reinforcing the mandate, resources and budget of Frontex will ensure that the agency can perform its work under the best possible conditions in order to better support the Member States,Añadido: law, including in search and rescue operations;Eliminado: 5 Regulation (EU) 2019/1896 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 13 November 2019 on the European Border and Coast Guard and repealing Regulations (EU) No 1052/2013 and (EU) 2016/1624 (OJ L 295, 14.11.2019, p. 1, ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/reg/2019/1896/oj). - Enmienda 18Rechazada
Paragraph 17
Presentada por Cristina Guarda · Verts/ALE
17. Stresses that Frontex’s primary mission must be the
Eliminado: protection of the EU’s external borders, the control of human traffickers and coyotes, and the fight against illegal immigration; underlines that a lack of border control is what leads to more deaths at sea;Añadido: prevention of deaths at sea, fully and consistently complying with relevant international human rights law; stresses that under the applicable EU and international legal framework, Member States are obliged to render assistance to any vessel or person in distress at sea, regardless of the nationality or status of the person or the circumstances in which that person is found; - Enmienda 22Rechazada
Recital B
Presentada por Marcin Sypniewski, Christine Anderson · ESN
… Ombudsman from 2013 until the end of her term in early 2025; Añadido: whereas from 2013 to 2024 her efforts in the areas of transparency and accountability – including inquiries concerning access to information on COVID-19 vaccine negotiations, recommendations linked to the prevention of maladministration in the EU institutions and findings following the ‘Qatargate’ scandal – were instrumental in highlighting the need to improve administration in the EU institutions;
- Enmienda 24Rechazada
Paragraph 14
Presentada por Marcin Sypniewski, Christine Anderson · ESN
… text messages and instant messages are considered ‘documents’ under Regulation (EC) No
Eliminado: 1049/20014 ;Añadido: 1049/20014; stresses that genuine transparency must include full and timely access to documents of major public interest, including those relating to large-scale public procurement procedures and negotiations conducted during crisis situations; considers that delays or refusals in granting access to such documents seriously undermine public trust in the EU’s institutions and calls on the Ombudsman to continue prioritising inquiries in this regard; 4 Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 of the European Parliament and of the … - Enmienda 26Rechazada
Paragraph 17
Presentada por Gheorghe Falcă · PPE
17. Stresses that Frontex’s
Eliminado: primary mission must beAñadido: role in the protection of theEliminado: EU’s external borders, the control of human traffickers and coyotes, andAñadido: Union’s external borders and in the fight againstEliminado: illegal immigration; underlines that a lack of border control is what leads to more deathsAñadido: smuggling and human trafficking networks contributes to discouraging dangerous crossings and preventing loss of life at sea; - Enmienda 27Rechazada
Recital AC
Presentada por Pál Szekeres, Juan Carlos Girauta Vidal, Sebastian Kruis +1 · PfE
AC. whereas the Ombudsman conducted an inquiry
Eliminado: following deaths inAñadido: in the context of the increase in illegal migration flows crossing the Mediterranean Sea andEliminado: suggested the establishment of an EU accountability mechanism that could independently investigate the respective roles of national authorities, Frontex and the Commission;Añadido: the disproportionate burden placed on the most affected EU regions; whereas the absence of effective border control and insufficient action against smuggling networks contribute to illegal migration flows and create a pull effect towards the EU’s borders; - Enmienda 31Rechazada
Paragraph 13
Presentada por Pál Szekeres, Juan Carlos Girauta Vidal, Sebastian Kruis · PfE
… Commissioners, with a view to safeguarding the integrity of the decision-making process; Añadido: stresses that this is particularly relevant in light of the case concerning Commission Vice-President Teresa Ribera, including the controversy linked to her husband’s position in Spain’s financial regulatory authority and her past involvement in the approval of environmental projects such as the Castor gas storage facility; highlights, in this context, the Ombudsman’s contribution towards enhancing the ethics and …
- Enmienda 37Rechazada
Paragraph 16
Presentada por Nikos Pappas, Valentina Palmisano · The Left
16.
Eliminado: Stresses that Frontex must operate within the provisions enshrined in its regulation5, including the obligations related to fundamental rightsAñadido: Appreciates the Ombudsman’s commitment to upholding the fundamental and human rights of migrants, including in the EU’s border management activities, by launching inquiries into the actions of Frontex and the Commission in this regard; stresses that several inquiries were opened in 2024 concerning the European Union Agency for Asylum and Frontex, which highlighted systemic challenges in ensuring accountability and compliance withEliminado: relevant international law; takes note of the reform of the Frontex mandate announced by the President of the Commission for 2026; expects that reinforcing the mandate, resources and budget of Frontex will ensure that the agency can perform its work under the best possible conditions in order to better support the Member States, including in search and rescue operations; 5 Regulation (EU) 2019/1896 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 13 November 2019 on the European Border and Coast Guard and repealing Regulations (EU) No 1052/2013 and (EU) 2016/1624 (OJ L 295, 14.11.2019, p. 1, ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/reg/2019/1896/oj).Añadido: EU fundamental rights obligations; calls on the Commission and the agencies concerned to report to Parliament on the action taken in response to the Ombudsman’s findings in these cases; - Enmienda 38Rechazada
Paragraph 17
Presentada por Nikos Pappas · The Left
17.
Eliminado: Stresses that Frontex’s primary mission must be the protection of the EU’s external borders, the control of human traffickers and coyotes, and the fight against illegal immigration; underlines that a lack of border control is what leads to more deaths at sea;Añadido: Expresses concern about the deployment of extensive surveillance and monitoring systems in Greece’s reception and identification centres; calls on the Commission to ensure that EU funding for such systems does not result in violations of fundamental rights of asylum seekers; insists that the Commission fully implement the Ombudsman’s recommendations concerning the transparency of relevant documents; - Enmienda 39Rechazada
Paragraph 17 a (new)
Presentada por Nikos Pappas · The Left
Añadido: 17a. Calls on the Commission to fully implement the Ombudsman’s recommendations regarding the monitoring of EU funds allocated to Greece for border management; underlines that the protection of fundamental rights must be a non-negotiable condition for the financing of projects linked to returns, detention centres and border operations;
- Enmienda 40Aprobada
Paragraph 19
Presentada por Nikos Pappas, Valentina Palmisano · The Left
19.
Eliminado: RegretsAñadido: Criticises the Commission’s refusal to follow the Ombudsman’s recommendation to grant greater public … documents related to the drafting of proposed legislation to combat child sexualEliminado: abuse; recalls that citizens should be able to scrutinise the Commission’s work on legislative proposals; underlines that transparency is of particular importance in this context, as the proposal directly touches onAñadido: abuse, as it has thus failed to ensure that citizens can verify that it has acted independently and exclusively in the public interest; underlines that the protection ofEliminado: children, citizens’ fundamental rights and private life;Añadido: children from sexual abuse must be the EU’s foremost priority; stresses that this fight must go hand in hand with the protection of fundamental rights, including the right to privacy and data protection; calls on the Commission to ensure full transparency in the preparation of the legislative proposal and to actively involve civil society organisations, experts and non-governmental organisations in the field of child protection in the process; further calls on the Ombudsman to closely monitor the action taken on this legislative file to ensure that EU measures are both effective in protecting children and fully compliant with the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union; - Enmienda 40Rechazada
Paragraph 19
Presentada por Nikos Pappas, Valentina Palmisano · The Left
19.
Eliminado: RegretsAñadido: Criticises the Commission’s refusal to follow the Ombudsman’s recommendation to grant greater public … documents related to the drafting of proposed legislation to combat child sexualEliminado: abuse; recalls that citizens should be able to scrutinise the Commission’s work on legislative proposals; underlines that transparency is of particular importance in this context, as the proposal directly touches onAñadido: abuse, as it has thus failed to ensure that citizens can verify that it has acted independently and exclusively in the public interest; underlines that the protection ofEliminado: children, citizens’ fundamental rights and private life;Añadido: children from sexual abuse must be the EU’s foremost priority; stresses that this fight must go hand in hand with the protection of fundamental rights, including the right to privacy and data protection; calls on the Commission to ensure full transparency in the preparation of the legislative proposal and to actively involve civil society organisations, experts and non-governmental organisations in the field of child protection in the process; further calls on the Ombudsman to closely monitor the action taken on this legislative file to ensure that EU measures are both effective in protecting children and fully compliant with the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union; - Enmienda 41Rechazada
Paragraph 21 a (new)
Presentada por Nikos Pappas, Valentina Palmisano, Manon Aubry · The Left
Añadido: 21a. Notes that the Ombudsman has opened several inquiries concerning transparency in the EU-Mercosur negotiations and has expressed concern to the Commission regarding its refusal to disclose key documents, considering this approach inconsistent with the Commission’s commitment to open policymaking; recalls the Ombudsman’s previous finding of maladministration in relation to the Commission’s failure to finalise the sustainability impact assessment before concluding the negotiations with the Mercosur countries; further notes that concerns persist regarding the lack of transparency, including in the context of the decision to provisionally apply the agreement prior to obtaining Parliament’s consent, thereby limiting democratic scrutiny and parliamentary oversight; calls on the Ombudsman to examine, without delay, whether the handling of the agreement’s provisional application complies with the principles of transparency, democratic accountability, institutional balance and respect for Parliament’s prerogatives;
Voto por grupo político
Cómo votaron los grupos políticos
- 11A favor
- 5En contra
- 7Abstención
- 8No votó
- 136A favor
- 1En contra
- 4Abstención
- 43No votó
- 60A favor
- 0En contra
- 0Abstención
- 24No votó
- 17A favor
- 42En contra
- 2Abstención
- 15No votó
- 4A favor
- 105En contra
- 0Abstención
- 26No votó
- 4A favor
- 18En contra
- 39Abstención
- 20No votó
- 1A favor
- 1En contra
- 21Abstención
- 5No votó
- 0A favor
- 35En contra
- 1Abstención
- 10No votó
- 0A favor
- 43En contra
- 2Abstención
- 8No votó
Miembros
Mostrando 10 de 718
| Nombre | País | Grupo | Posición de voto |
|---|---|---|---|
A favor | |||
A favor | |||
A favor | |||
A favor | |||
A favor | |||
A favor | |||
A favor | |||
A favor | |||
A favor | |||
A favor |