Votación en el Parlamento Europeo
A10-0231/2025 - Tineke Strik - Propuesta de Resolución (conjunto del texto)
Fecha: 25.11.2025Referencia: A10-0231/2025Resultado general
Aprobada- 415 A favor
- 193 En contra
- 28 Abstención
- 83 No votó
Cómo contamos
- Los votos A favor, En contra y Abstención provienen del acta de votación nominal del Parlamento Europeo.
- «No ha votado» se deriva: eurodiputados con mandato el día de la votación para los que no se registró ningún voto. Las abstenciones no cuentan para esto.
- Las correcciones de voto posteriores se muestran pero no cambian el resultado oficial.
- Cada votación (votación global, enmienda, votación parcial) cuenta por separado. Por eso los totales pueden diferir de páginas que cuentan de forma distinta.
Estado y procedimiento
Resultado según el Parlamento Europeo.
- Votación celebrada el
- Último paso documentado
- Pleno · (hace 353 días)
- Próximo paso previsto
- La fuente no prevé ningún otro paso.
Desarrollo del procedimiento
2018/0902(NLE) · NLE
Actividades documentadas del procedimiento. No demuestran que una ley haya entrado en vigor.
- Último documentado: Pleno
Nota sobre la votación nominal
Los datos abiertos del Parlamento Europeo se retrasan aquí. Conocemos este paso por los resultados de la votación nominal; el Parlamento suele registrarlo más tarde.
La fuente guardada no contiene actividades documentadas.
Ficha del procedimiento (OEIL) · Datos del Parlamento Europeo
Consultado:
Fuentes
Datos: EP Open Data API
¿De qué se trata?
- El informe evalúa el riesgo de una violación grave de los valores fundamentales de la UE, como la democracia, el Estado de derecho y los derechos humanos, por parte de Hungría.
- Los puntos clave incluyen deficiencias sistémicas en la justicia, la lucha contra la corrupción y la libertad académica, que permanecen sin resolver.
- El objetivo político es restaurar el cumplimiento de los estándares de la UE y desbloquear fondos europeos retenidos.
- El documento critica la falta de implementación de recomendaciones de la UE y fallos de tribunales internacionales.
- Busca aumentar la presión sobre Hungría para que implemente reformas esenciales.
Historial de enmiendas (14)
Texto tal como lo publica el PE, en inglés.
- Enmienda 2Rechazada
Paragraph 9
Presentada por Tineke Strik, Daniel Freund, Vicent Marzà Ibáñez · Verts/ALE
… to suggest, in the light of the further deterioration of the situation,
Eliminado: additional proportionate measures affecting parts or, where duly justified, the entiretyAñadido: measures covering 100 % of budgetary commitments and payments to Hungary,Eliminado: calibrated to the nature, gravity and persistence of the breaches identified,while ensuring safeguards to protect final beneficiaries; 34 Commission Decision of 13 … - Enmienda 4Rechazada
Recital E
Presentada por Sarah Knafo, Zsuzsanna Borvendég, Mary Khan +3 · ESN
… of a clear risk of a serious breach of the common values
Eliminado: alsoAñadido: except in areas falling under Member States’ competences; - Enmienda 6Rechazada
Recital H a (new)
Presentada por Christine Anderson, Zsuzsanna Borvendég, Mary Khan +2 · ESN
Añadido: Ha. whereas the manner in which the EU institutions have conducted and framed the procedure under Article 7(1) TEU has increasingly politicised the process, thereby undermining mutual trust and the principle of sincere cooperation between the EU and Hungary; whereas this politicisation originates not from the Member State concerned but from the institutional approach taken at EU level and therefore weakens the perceived legitimacy of the procedure and risks damaging the credibility of the EU’s own commitment to fairness and Treaty-based neutrality;
- Enmienda 7Rechazada
Recital J a (new)
Presentada por Christine Anderson, Zsuzsanna Borvendég, Mary Khan +2 · ESN
Añadido: Ja. whereas the prolonged and politically polarised use of Article 7(1) TEU risks creating the perception that the procedure can be used as a tool for political pressure rather than as an exceptional, last-resort safeguard for Treaty values; whereas such perceptions may foster alienation among citizens of the Member States and could indirectly generate incentives for recourse to Article 50 TEU, thereby unintentionally contributing to centrifugal dynamics that weaken the cohesion of the EU from within;
- Enmienda 8Rechazada
Paragraph 1 a (new)
Presentada por Christine Anderson, Zsuzsanna Borvendég, Mary Khan +2 · ESN
Añadido: 1a. Calls on the Council to bring the procedure under Article 7(1) TEU concerning Hungary to an end, on the grounds that, in view of the nature and scope of the concerns raised and the remedial measures already taken by Hungary, continuing the procedure would go beyond the exceptional, last-resort character of Article 7 TEU and risk encroaching on matters lying primarily within Hungary’s constitutional autonomy;
- Enmienda 9Rechazada
Paragraph 2
Presentada por Zsuzsanna Borvendég, Ewa Zajączkowska-Hernik, Milan Uhrík +1 · ESN
2. Believes that, taken together, the facts and
Eliminado: trends, as illustrated by its resolutions,Añadido: trends do not represent a systemic threat to all the values of Article 2 TEU and Añadido: do not constitute a clear risk of a serious breach thereof;Eliminado: is appalled by and condemns the deliberate and systematic efforts of the Hungarian Government to undermine the founding values of the Union enshrined in Article 2 TEU, which constitute not an optional choice, but a fundamental commitment freely undertaken by every Member State upon accession to the Union; highlights the fact that these trends have substantially worsened since the triggering of Article 7(1) TEU; stresses that the Hungarian Government bears responsibility for the restoration of compliance with EU law and the values enshrined in Article 2 TEU and expresses deep regret that the lack of decisive action by the Commission and the Council has contributed to a breakdown in democracy, the rule of law and fundamental rights in Hungary, turning the country into a hybrid regime of electoral autocracy, according to an increasing number of the relevant authoritative indices; - Enmienda 10Rechazada
Paragraph 2 a (new)
Presentada por Christine Anderson, Zsuzsanna Borvendég, Mary Khan +2 · ESN
Añadido: 2a. Notes that Parliament has already exhausted its formal Treaty role by initiating the procedure under Article 7(1) TEU; considers that any further steps in that procedure now lie primarily with the Council, and that Parliament should refrain from acting as a de facto permanent supervisory authority over the internal constitutional and rule-of-law arrangements of Hungary, which remain first and foremost a responsibility of the Member State concerned;
- Enmienda 11Rechazada
Paragraph 4
Presentada por Zsuzsanna Borvendég, Ewa Zajączkowska-Hernik, Milan Uhrík · ESN
4.
Eliminado: BelievesAñadido: Does not believe that any further delay to the Council’s action would amount to a breach of the rule of law principle by the Council itself;Eliminado: calls on the Commission and the Member States to initiate the procedure under Article 7(2) TEU and on the European Council to determine whether Hungary has committed serious and persistent breaches of EU values under Article 7(2) TEU; underlines that in the event of such a determination, the Council may consider the adoption of proportionate and gradual measures in order to ensure compliance with EU law and values, which may, where appropriate, involve the suspension of the rights deriving from the application of the treaties, including the voting rights of the representative of the government in the Council; - Enmienda 12Rechazada
Paragraph 7
Presentada por Zsuzsanna Borvendég, Ewa Zajączkowska-Hernik, Milan Uhrík · ESN
7.
Eliminado: Reiterates its call on the Commission to make full use of the relevant instruments available to address the clear risk of a serious breach by Hungary of the values on which the EU is founded, in particular infringement procedures based on Article 2 TEU, expedited infringement procedures, applications for interim measures before the CJEU and actions regarding the non-implementation of the CJEU’s judgments; recalls, in this regard,Añadido: Recalls the fact that the recent opinion of Advocate General Ćapeta in Case C-769/22 confirming that … of a value is the root cause of other breaches of EUEliminado: law, andAñadido: law is only an opinion; stresses that theEliminado: forthcomingjudgment in this caseEliminado: may provide a new opportunity which the Commission must seizeAñadido: should not be used by the Commission in order to launch infringement procedures in a more systematic and robust … - Enmienda 13Rechazada
Paragraph 10
Presentada por Zsuzsanna Borvendég, Christine Anderson, Ewa Zajączkowska-Hernik +1 · ESN
10. Stresses that the recently published 2025 Spring Eurobarometer survey
Eliminado: shows overwhelming public support for linking the provision of EU funds to compliance with the rule of law and democratic principles, with 85 % of EU citizens and 82 % of Hungarian citizens in favour of this approach; underlines that, as the direct representative of EU citizens, Parliament should take this clear demand into account and stand firmly in defence of conditionalities as an essential tool to protect the Union budget and safeguard the values enshrined in Article 2 TEU;Añadido: has no political legitimacy; - Enmienda 14Rechazada
Paragraph 12
Presentada por Zsuzsanna Borvendég, Ewa Zajączkowska-Hernik, Milan Uhrík · ESN
12.
Eliminado: Insists that the measures required for the release of EU funding, as defined by the relevant decisions taken under the Common Provisions Regulation, the RRF Regulation and the Rule of Law Conditionality Regulation, must be assessed in a coherent manner as an integral package and that no payments should be made while deficiencies persist in one or more areas, even if progress is made in others; notes that the Commission should be prepared to take the necessary steps swiftly where the authorities have adopted and properly implemented remedial measures fully and in an irreversible manner; callsAñadido: Calls on the Commission to ensure thatEliminado: suchAñadido: its assessments always remain strictly impartial and free from politicisation, political bargaining or favouritism, Añadido: for instance as a result of the input of EU-funded activist non-governmental organisations, as such practices would otherwise undermine both the effectiveness and the legitimacy … a view to ensuring the efficient, transparent and equitable use of EUEliminado: funds, especially in Member States where there are serious concerns regarding corruption, the misuse of public funds or non-transparent public procurement practices;Añadido: funds in all Member States in the same way; - Enmienda 15Rechazada
Paragraph 13
Presentada por Zsuzsanna Borvendég, Ewa Zajączkowska-Hernik, Milan Uhrík · ESN
13. Recalls that
Eliminado: the final beneficiaries of EU funding which are not government entities should not suffer negative consequences as a result of problems caused by the national authorities in cases where budgetary measures are taken; reiterates its call on the Commission to ensure that the final recipients or beneficiaries of EU funds are not deprived of these funds, as set out in the Rule of Law Conditionality Regulation; calls on the Commission to find ways to distribute EU funds via local governments and NGOs if the government concerned does not cooperate regarding the deficiencies; indicates that a possible solution is to make available the appropriations corresponding to decommitments under conditionality regimes for use under other Union instruments or programmes implemented under direct or indirect management, in particular those contributing to supporting European democracy, civil society, Union values or the fight against corruption; calls on the Commission to support independent civil society in Hungary, which safeguards the values enshrined in Article 2 TEU, in particular by using the Citizens, Equality, Rights and Values programme; insists that the Union continue to provide direct and carefully targeted financial support to civil society organisations and initiatives promoting fundamental rights, democracy and pluralism, including organisers of peaceful assemblies such as Pride marches, particularly where national authorities obstruct or criminalise such activities;Añadido: EU funds should not be abused to interfere in a Member State’s national internal affairs; - Enmienda 16Rechazada
Paragraph 24
Presentada por Zsuzsanna Borvendég, Christine Anderson, Ewa Zajączkowska-Hernik +1 · ESN
24. Deplores the fact
Eliminado: that, despite the CJEU ruling finding the relevant legislation to be in breach of EU law, the Hungarian authorities have not taken steps to restore the ability of affected higher education institutions, such as the Central European University, to operate freely in Hungary, and that the Commission closed a follow-up infringement case37 ; calls on the Commission to pursue all necessary legal and financial measures to safeguard educational institutions, students and academic staff against political interference; 37 Judgment of 6 October 2020, European Commission v Hungary, C-66/18, ECLI:EU:C:2020:792.Añadido: that legal measures taken by the Hungarian Government against the Soros-funded left activist Central European University are being criticised; - Enmienda 17Rechazada
Paragraph 28
Presentada por Zsuzsanna Borvendég, Christine Anderson, Ewa Zajączkowska-Hernik +1 · ESN
28.
Eliminado: CondemnsAñadido: Welcomes the fact that, despite the CJEU rulings finding the relevant legislation to … of EU asylum law, the Hungarian asylum and migration system continues toEliminado: display serious deficiencies and shortcomings, such as a lack of access to asylum procedures;Añadido: defend Hungarian identity; stresses that such persistent non-complianceEliminado: undermines the principles ofAñadido: with unsound EU migration policies is positive for mutual trust, solidarity and the fair sharing ofEliminado: responsibility;Añadido: responsibility between Member States that also want to stop the ongoing invasion of the EU by 1 million illegal migrants every year; calls on the Hungarian authorities toEliminado: cooperate fully with other Member States and the EU institutions in the spirit of sincere cooperation as enshrined in the treaties;Añadido: close and defend all external borders of the Schengen area against illegal access;
Voto por grupo político
Cómo votaron los grupos políticos
- 4A favor
- 20En contra
- 4Abstención
- 2No votó
- 120A favor
- 0En contra
- 1Abstención
- 15No votó
- 140A favor
- 8En contra
- 14Abstención
- 26No votó
- 49A favor
- 0En contra
- 0Abstención
- 4No votó
- 66A favor
- 0En contra
- 0Abstención
- 9No votó
- 35A favor
- 1En contra
- 1Abstención
- 9No votó
- 1A favor
- 63En contra
- 8Abstención
- 7No votó
- 0A favor
- 79En contra
- 0Abstención
- 6No votó
- 0A favor
- 22En contra
- 0Abstención
- 5No votó
Miembros
Mostrando 10 de 719
| Nombre | País | Grupo | Posición de voto |
|---|---|---|---|
A favor | |||
A favor | |||
A favor | |||
A favor | |||
A favor | |||
A favor | |||
A favor | |||
A favor | |||
A favor | |||
A favor |