Votación en el Parlamento Europeo
Viejos retos y nuevas prácticas comerciales en el mercado interior
Resultado general
Aprobada- 306 A favor
- 80 En contra
- 57 Abstención
- 276 No votó
Cómo contamos
- Los votos A favor, En contra y Abstención provienen del acta de votación nominal del Parlamento Europeo.
- «No ha votado» se deriva: eurodiputados con mandato el día de la votación para los que no se registró ningún voto. Las abstenciones no cuentan para esto.
- Las correcciones de voto posteriores se muestran pero no cambian el resultado oficial.
- Cada votación (votación global, enmienda, votación parcial) cuenta por separado. Por eso los totales pueden diferir de páginas que cuentan de forma distinta.
Estado y procedimiento
Resultado según el Parlamento Europeo.
- Votación celebrada el
- Último paso documentado
- Pleno · (hace 556 días)
- Próximo paso previsto
- La fuente no prevé ningún otro paso.
Desarrollo del procedimiento
2025/2542(RSP) · RSP
Actividades documentadas del procedimiento. No demuestran que una ley haya entrado en vigor.
- Último documentado: Pleno
Actividades documentadas (8)
- Presentación al pleno
- Presentación al pleno
- Presentación al pleno
- Presentación al pleno
- Presentación al pleno
- Debate en el pleno
- Votación en el pleno
- Resultados de la votación en el pleno
Actividades previstas (realización no confirmada)
- Debate en el pleno
- Votación en el pleno
Ficha del procedimiento (OEIL) · Datos del Parlamento Europeo
Consultado:
Fuentes
Datos: EP Open Data API
¿De qué se trata?
- Mercado único pilar central de la integración europea.
- Enfoque en competitividad ante desafíos geopolíticos y climáticos.
- Exigencia de simplificación y menos burocracia para pymes.
Historial de enmiendas (12)
Texto tal como lo publica el PE, en inglés.
Recital E (new)
Presentada por Hanna Gedin · The Left
Añadido: E. whereas the green and digital transitions require an update to single market rules in order to set the right conditions to achieve a fairer, more sustainable and digitally fit EU; whereas regulatory tools must be aligned with those policy objectives; whereas single market rules to boost competitiveness must not come at the expense of safe and good-quality jobs within the EU;
Paragraph 5
Presentada por Hanna Gedin · The Left
5.
Eliminado: WelcomesAñadido: Stresses that the proposal for a regulation on a public interface connected to the … workers and amending Regulation (EU) No 1024/2012 (COM/2024/531), which should lead toEliminado: simplification and strengthened enforcement; notes also that digitalisation could significantly reduce administrative burdens for cross-border services and ensure better access for businesses and consumers; calls, in this regard, for a single declaration portal and the digitalisation of A1 forms for cross-border services;Añadido: strengthened enforcement, must not lead to a decline in wages and working conditions and a race to the bottom;Paragraph 16
Presentada por Hanna Gedin · The Left
16. Considers that
Eliminado: the single market isAñadido: State aid measures are a key tool in times ofEliminado: crisis if the Member States can act in a coordinated way;Añadido: crisis; highlights the key role that the relaxation of State aid rules played in keeping the EU single market afloat during the COVID-19 pandemic and during Russia’s ongoing invasion of Ukraine; calls, therefore, for greater certainty and proactive measures in relaxing State aid rules for future crises that the Union may face, for the benefit of the single market; considers that the recently adopted Internal Market Emergency and Resilience Act2 will …Paragraph 29
Presentada por Hanna Gedin · The Left
… to protect consumers against greenwashing by establishing requirements for substantiation and verification; Añadido: stresses, against this background, the importance of maintaining and reinforcing sustainability laws such as the Green Claims Directive, the Corporate Sustainability Due Diligence Directive1a and the Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive1b; ______________ 1a OJ L, 2024/1760, 5.7.2024, ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/dir/2024/1760/oj. 1b OJ L 322, 16.12.2022, p. 15, ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/dir/2022/2464/oj.
Paragraph 2 a (new)
Presentada por Piotr Müller · ECR
Añadido: 2a. Highlights that ongoing barriers and political pressure to expand regulations have constrained the development of the single market, as noted in the Draghi report; calls for a shift towards a regulatory approach that empowers companies to grow, innovate and lead internationally, thereby restoring the single market as a true engine of growth and competitiveness;
Paragraph 2 a (new)
Presentada por Piotr Müller · ECR
Añadido: 2a. Highlights that ongoing barriers and political pressure to expand regulations have constrained the development of the single market, as noted in the Draghi report; calls for a shift towards a regulatory approach that empowers companies to grow, innovate and lead internationally, thereby restoring the single market as a true engine of growth and competitiveness;
Paragraph 21 a (new)
Presentada por Piotr Müller · ECR
Añadido: 21a. Stresses that the implementation of the DSA must fully respect freedom of expression; underlines that actions against illegal content must not restrict lawful speech and calls for proportionate and transparent enforcement to protect an open and democratic digital space;
Paragraph 21 a (new)
Presentada por Piotr Müller · ECR
Añadido: 21a. Stresses that the implementation of the DSA must fully respect freedom of expression; underlines that actions against illegal content must not restrict lawful speech and calls for proportionate and transparent enforcement to protect an open and democratic digital space;
Paragraph 35
Presentada por Piotr Müller · ECR
… for Ukraine’s gradual integration into the EU single market and sectoral programmes; Añadido: firmly opposes, however, any further liberalisation of trade with Ukraine beyond the current framework unless and until full alignment of production standards and regulatory requirements is achieved, particularly in the agricultural sector; stresses that any easing of customs duties or safeguard measures must remain strictly conditional on Ukraine meeting the EU’s rigorous standards and must be accompanied by clear guarantees of compensatory mechanisms, including subsidies, ensuring the protection and competitiveness of European producers operating within the EU; underlines that the Member States neighbouring Ukraine have been disproportionately affected by surging imports resulting from autonomous trade measures and must not bear the burden of unfair competition;
Paragraph 15 a (new)
Presentada por Klara Dostalova · PfE
Añadido: 15a. Stresses the need, in the current context of high inflation in the energy and food sectors, and as highlighted in the 2025 Consumer Conditions Scoreboard, to reduce the financial burden on consumers and businesses, particularly owing to the EU regulatory framework resulting from the European Green Deal; strongly calls for the adoption of targeted legislative measures to protect consumers and businesses against excessive energy costs and speculative manipulation;
Paragraph 24
Presentada por Klara Dostalova · PfE
… recent years; highlights the significance of Digital Product Passports in these processes; Añadido: urges the Commission to take legal action that would grant the Member States the discretion to impose fees on consignments in cases of heightened inflows from non-EU countries; calls, therefore, for a reinforced market surveillance framework and a revision of …
Paragraph 37 a (new)
Presentada por Klara Dostalova · PfE
Añadido: 37a. Emphasises that the exercise of simplification should not be limited to the anecdotal deletion of some excessive reporting requirements; calls on the Commission to put in place a real ‘SME test’ to conduct an in-depth assessment of the impact of recent and upcoming EU legislation on competitiveness, so as to identify and eliminate any redundant, excessive or contradictory regulatory requirements further burdening businesses; urges the Commission, in this regard, to present an ‘SME omnibus’ before the end of 2025;
Voto por grupo político
Cómo votaron los grupos políticos
- 5A favor
- 2En contra
- 7Abstención
- 15No votó
- 96A favor
- 1En contra
- 4Abstención
- 87No votó
- 75A favor
- 0En contra
- 3Abstención
- 58No votó
- 32A favor
- 3En contra
- 19Abstención
- 26No votó
- 42A favor
- 1En contra
- 0Abstención
- 10No votó
- 54A favor
- 0En contra
- 0Abstención
- 21No votó
- 2A favor
- 32En contra
- 21Abstención
- 30No votó
- 0A favor
- 19En contra
- 2Abstención
- 6No votó
- 0A favor
- 22En contra
- 1Abstención
- 23No votó
Miembros
Mostrando 10 de 719
| Nombre | País | Grupo | Posición de voto |
|---|---|---|---|
A favor | |||
A favor | |||
A favor | |||
A favor | |||
A favor | |||
A favor | |||
A favor | |||
A favor | |||
A favor | |||
A favor |