Votación en el Parlamento Europeo
Banco Central Europeo: informe anual 2024
Resultado general
Aprobada- 378 A favor
- 233 En contra
- 26 Abstención
- 82 No votó
Cómo contamos
- Los votos A favor, En contra y Abstención provienen del acta de votación nominal del Parlamento Europeo.
- «No ha votado» se deriva: eurodiputados con mandato el día de la votación para los que no se registró ningún voto. Las abstenciones no cuentan para esto.
- Las correcciones de voto posteriores se muestran pero no cambian el resultado oficial.
- Cada votación (votación global, enmienda, votación parcial) cuenta por separado. Por eso los totales pueden diferir de páginas que cuentan de forma distinta.
Estado y procedimiento
Resultado según el Parlamento Europeo.
- Votación celebrada el
- Último paso documentado
- Pleno · (hace 659 días)
- Próximo paso previsto
- La fuente no prevé ningún otro paso.
Desarrollo del procedimiento
2024/2054(INI) · INI
Actividades documentadas del procedimiento. No demuestran que una ley haya entrado en vigor.
- Documentado: Remisión
- Documentado: Examen en comisión
- Último documentado: Pleno
Actividades documentadas (17)
- Remisión a comisión
- Presentación del informe en comisión
- Presentación de enmiendas en comisión
- Aprobación del informe en comisión
- Presentación al pleno
- Presentación al pleno
- Presentación al pleno
- Presentación al pleno
- Presentación al pleno
- Presentación al pleno
- Presentación al pleno
- Presentación al pleno
- Presentación al pleno
- Presentación al pleno
- Debate en el pleno
- Votación en el pleno
- Resultados de la votación en el pleno
Actividades previstas (realización no confirmada)
- Debate en el pleno
- Votación en el pleno
Ficha del procedimiento (OEIL) · Datos del Parlamento Europeo
Consultado:
Fuentes
Datos: EP Open Data API
¿De qué se trata?
- Informe anual 2024 del BCE centrado en tendencias inflacionarias y política monetaria.
- Exigencia de mayor rendición de cuentas del BCE ante el Parlamento.
- Preparación del euro digital con énfasis en protección de datos y mantenimiento del efectivo.
Historial de enmiendas (16)
Texto tal como lo publica el PE, en inglés.
- Enmienda 2Rechazada
Paragraph 26 a (new)
Presentada por Jussi Saramo · The Left
Añadido: 26a. Highlights the expected benefits of a public digital euro, such as improved financial inclusion, enhanced resilience of the payment system, reduced costs for merchants, and a reliable offline backup payment system; expresses concern, at the same time, about the dependence of the European payment system on non-European payment service providers;
- Enmienda 3Rechazada
Paragraph 39 a (new)
Presentada por Jussi Saramo · The Left
Añadido: 39a. Highlights the need for an environmentally sustainable monetary policy in the form of, for example, green refinancing operations;
- Enmienda 6Aprobada
Paragraph 28
Presentada por Denis Nesci, Johan Van Overtveldt · ECR
28. Reiterates that
Eliminado: the digital euro will serve as complement to physical cash, that it should not replace cash and that cash willAñadido: cash should remain widely available and accessible at all times in order to ensure … - Enmienda 17Rechazada
Recital -A a (new)
Presentada por João Oliveira · The Left
Añadido: Aa. whereas the increases in reference interest rates determined by the ECB have had and continue to have damaging effects on the solvency of households, microenterprises and SMEs in countries where variable interest rates prevail;
- Enmienda 18Rechazada
Recital A a (new)
Presentada por João Oliveira · The Left
Añadido: Aa. whereas, in countries such as Spain, Portugal and Finland, variable-rate mortgages were particularly popular when consumers acquired their homes in the past; whereas those consumers were immediately affected by interest rate rises; whereas consumers with fixed-rate loans, on the other hand, only feel the impact of interest rate rises later and under certain conditions; whereas such variations within the euro area means that the transmission of monetary policy decisions is likely to be quicker in countries that have a higher percentage of variable-rate loans1c; whereas the situation has contributed to difficulties accessing housing in some countries1d; 1c Baldassarri, Lorenzo, et al., ‘Monetary Policy Transmission: Why Consumers’ Housing Situations Matter’, European Central Bank, 3 October 2024 (www.ecb.europa.eu/press/blog/date/2024/html/ecb.blog20241003~44069e813f.en.html). 1d Igan, Deniz, ‘The Housing Affordability Crunch’, IMF, 3 December 2024 (www.imf.org/en/Publications/fandd/issues/2024/12/thehousingaffordabilitycrunchdenizigan).
- Enmienda 19Rechazada
Recital A b (new)
Presentada por João Oliveira · The Left
Añadido: Ab. whereas a recent study by the International Monetary Fund1e shows that the pass-through of increased interest rates to consumers and businesses by the banking sector has been very heterogeneous, taking into account the sector concentration, the type of mortgage rate and the amount of mortgage borrowing families have, among other factors; 1e Beyer, R., Chen, R., Li, C., Misch, F., Ozturk, E., and Ratnovski, L., ‘Monetary Policy PassThrough to Interest Rates: Stylized Facts from 30 European Countries’, IMF working paper (WP/24/9), 2024.
- Enmienda 20Rechazada
Recital A c (new)
Presentada por João Oliveira · The Left
Añadido: Ac. whereas the dividends of European banks alone have exceeded pre-2008 levels and the rewards for shareholders are even greater if share buybacks are taken into account1f; 1f Foy, Simon, ‘European banks to reward investors with bumper €123bn in payouts’, Financial Times, 23 January 2025 (www.ft.com/content/cfe4c11303b54cd5b61f1c5d7e98e281).
- Enmienda 21Rechazada
Recital A d (new)
Presentada por João Oliveira · The Left
Añadido: Ad. whereas reference interest rate rises increase financial margins in the banking sector, especially where the greatest sector concentration can be found;
- Enmienda 22Rechazada
Paragraph 1 a (new)
Presentada por João Oliveira · The Left
Añadido: 1a. Considers it imperative that the European Central Bank swiftly reverses the reference interest rate rises;
- Enmienda 23Rechazada
Paragraph 1 b (new)
Presentada por João Oliveira · The Left
Añadido: 1b. Takes the view that, in the immediate future, banking sector profits should be used to cover of the impact of higher reference interest rates on mortgages;
- Enmienda 26Rechazada
Paragraph 18
Presentada por Auke Zijlstra, Jorge Martín Frías, Paolo Borchia · PfE
18. Stresses that supply shocks, primarily originating from
Eliminado: external sources,Añadido: irresponsible government policies, such as over-reliance on energy from unstable and unpredictable sources such as wind and solar, as well as political aversion to stable onshore energy sources, and worrying geopolitical developments, were among the key drivers of the inflation surges; recognises that monetary … - Enmienda 27Rechazada
Paragraph 26
Presentada por Auke Zijlstra, Enikő Győri, Jorge Martín Frías +1 · PfE
26.
Eliminado: Welcomes the ECB’s progress on the digital euro project and itsAñadido: Notes that the US President Donald Trump has recently issued a ‘digital financial technology’ executive order terminating all federal agencies’ work on a digital US dollar; recalls that the Bank of Canada, the Swedish Riksbank and the Danish Nationalbank have also discontinued their work on their respective central bank digital currencies (CBDCs); calls on the ECB and the Commission to take these developments into account in the ongoing preparatory process and in their ongoing dialogue with Parliament;Eliminado: underscores that the digital euro should deliver clear added value to European citizens, including enhanced strategic autonomy in payments, a higher level of competition in the retail payment market, potential to foster innovation in payments and finance, improved financial inclusion and a reliable offline backup payment system; calls on the ECB to clearly communicate these benefits in order to foster public trust and awareness; notes that the EU co-legislators will need to strike the right balance, among others, on holding limits, privacy concerns, competition with private payment solutions and usability in a business context; - Enmienda 29Rechazada
Paragraph 39
Presentada por Auke Zijlstra, Enikő Győri, Jorge Martín Frías +1 · PfE
… its available tools to ensure that banks take all financial and external
Eliminado: risks, including climate and geopolitical risks, seriously;Añadido: risks seriously, including geopolitical risks and risks resulting from negative effects of the Green Deal on prices, in particular of commodities, and negative effects on employment that may arise if an unpragmatic approach is taken to the digital and green transition; welcomes the ECB’s activities to further enhance the Eurosystem’s risk assessment tools and capabilities in order to better includeEliminado: climate- and environment-related risks, particularly because climate change and extreme weather phenomena could lead to greater price volatility,Añadido: environment-related risks, in so far as they are properly quantified, especially in the agri-food sector;Eliminado: invites the ECB to continue its work on climate risk stress tests developed to assess the resilience of banks and corporations in the face of climate transition risk; - Enmienda 30Rechazada
Paragraph 13 a (new)
Presentada por Bas Eickhout · Verts/ALE
Añadido: 13a. Agrees with the ECB President’s statement that ‘investment in renewables, grids and storage will lead to lower and more stable energy prices’; underlines that reducing the EU’s dependence on imported fossil fuels and supporting domestically generated renewable energy will reduce the magnitude of energy-related price shocks, reinforcing EU competitiveness while contributing to the ECB’s price stability mandate; stresses, therefore, the convergence of price stability, climate and competitiveness objectives; invites the ECB to reflect on the synergies between monetary and energy policies in this regard;
- Enmienda 32Rechazada
Paragraph 36
Presentada por Bas Eickhout · Verts/ALE
36.
Eliminado: Insists that the ECB respect the market neutrality approach in its monetary operations;Añadido: Notes the ECB’s acknowledgement that market neutrality is a voluntary operational tool, rather than a legal requirement; - Enmienda 41Aprobada
Paragraph 26 a (new)
Presentada por Marco Falcone · PPE
Añadido: 26a. Demands that any decision to issue the digital euro should not be taken exclusively by the Governing Council of the ECB; considers, instead, that the decision on whether or not to introduce a digital euro is ultimately a political decision that has to be taken by the EU’s legislators, given the profound potential impact of this decision on a wide range of EU domains, including privacy, consumer protection, financial stability, financial policy and other areas that go beyond the strict remit of monetary policy;
Voto por grupo político
Cómo votaron los grupos políticos
- 2A favor
- 23En contra
- 1Abstención
- 3No votó
- 34A favor
- 13En contra
- 23Abstención
- 10No votó
- 167A favor
- 0En contra
- 1Abstención
- 20No votó
- 112A favor
- 5En contra
- 0Abstención
- 19No votó
- 63A favor
- 3En contra
- 0Abstención
- 9No votó
- 0A favor
- 43En contra
- 0Abstención
- 3No votó
- 0A favor
- 76En contra
- 0Abstención
- 10No votó
- 0A favor
- 50En contra
- 0Abstención
- 3No votó
- 0A favor
- 20En contra
- 1Abstención
- 5No votó
Miembros
Mostrando 10 de 719
| Nombre | País | Grupo | Posición de voto |
|---|---|---|---|
A favor | |||
A favor | |||
A favor | |||
A favor | |||
A favor | |||
A favor | |||
A favor | |||
A favor | |||
A favor | |||
A favor |