Votación en el Parlamento Europeo

Modificación del Reglamento interno del Parlamento por lo que respecta a las formaciones sobre prevención de conflictos y del acoso en el lugar de trabajo y sobre la buena gestión de una oficina

Gabriele Bischoff – Propuesta de Decisión
Fecha: 24.04.2024·Referencia: A9-0163/2024
Ponente: Gabriele Bischoff

Resultado general

Aprobada
  • 473 A favor
  • 89 En contra
  • 53 Abstención
  • 90 No votó
Estado y procedimiento

Resultado según el Parlamento Europeo.

Votación celebrada el
Último paso documentado
Pleno · (hace 933 días)
Próximo paso previsto
La fuente no prevé ningún otro paso.

Desarrollo del procedimiento

2024/2006(REG) · REG

Actividades documentadas del procedimiento. No demuestran que una ley haya entrado en vigor.

  1. Documentado: Examen en comisión35 días hasta el siguiente paso
  2. Documentado: Pleno6 días hasta el siguiente paso
  3. Documentado: Remisión14 días hasta el siguiente paso
  4. Último documentado: Pleno933 días desde el inicio de este paso
Actividades documentadas (6)
  1. Presentación del informe en comisión
  2. Aprobación del informe en comisión
  3. Presentación al pleno
  4. Remisión a comisión
  5. Votación en el pleno
  6. Resultados de la votación en el pleno
Actividades previstas (realización no confirmada)
  1. Votación en el pleno

Ficha del procedimiento (OEIL) · Datos del Parlamento Europeo
Consultado:

Fuentes

Datos: EP Open Data API

¿De qué se trata?

  • Obligación de formación para diputados en prevención de conflictos y gestión administrativa.
  • Sanciones por no asistir a formaciones obligatorias .
  • Entrada en vigor el 16 de julio de 2024 .
Fuente: Resumen generado por IA con Mistral

Historial de enmiendas (5)

Texto tal como lo publica el PE, en inglés.

  1. Enmienda 6 · Enmiendas al Reglamento internoAprobada

    Annex II – point 5

    Presentada por Gwendoline DelbosCorfield · Verts/ALE

    5. Where necessary, Members will cooperate Eliminado: promptly and fully Añadido: fully, in accordance with the procedures Eliminado: in place for Añadido: laid down by the Bureau, with a view to managing situations of conflict or harassment (psychological or sexual), including Añadido: by responding promptly to any allegations of harassment. Members Eliminado: should Añadido: who have not already done so shall take part in specialised training organised for them Añadido: by the European Parliament on preventing conflict and harassment in the workplace and on good office management. Añadido: This training shall be completed within the first six months of the Member’s term of office save in duly substantiated exceptional cases. The Members’ certificates of completion of this training will be published on Parliament’s website. It is considered a serious breach of Rule 10(6) if a Member has not completed the specialised training, in breach of the second subparagraph of this point. This breach shall lead, pursuant to Rule 176, to the imposition of one or more penalties, which shall include at least the forfeiture of entitlement to the daily allowance for a period of five days.

  2. Enmienda 6 · Enmiendas al Reglamento internoRechazada

    Annex II – point 5

    Presentada por Gwendoline DelbosCorfield · Verts/ALE

    5. Where necessary, Members will cooperate Eliminado: promptly and fully Añadido: fully, in accordance with the procedures Eliminado: in place for Añadido: laid down by the Bureau, with a view to managing situations of conflict or harassment (psychological or sexual), including Añadido: by responding promptly to any allegations of harassment. Members Eliminado: should Añadido: who have not already done so shall take part in specialised training organised for them Añadido: by the European Parliament on preventing conflict and harassment in the workplace and on good office management. Añadido: This training shall be completed within the first six months of the Member’s term of office save in duly substantiated exceptional cases. The Members’ certificates of completion of this training will be published on Parliament’s website. It is considered a serious breach of Rule 10(6) if a Member has not completed the specialised training, in breach of the second subparagraph of this point. This breach shall lead, pursuant to Rule 176, to the imposition of one or more penalties, which shall include at least the forfeiture of entitlement to the daily allowance for a period of five days.

  3. Enmienda 7 · Enmiendas al Reglamento internoRechazada

    Rule 21 - paragraph 1

    Presentada por Rainer Wieland · PPE

    … it considers that the Member in question has been guilty of serious Eliminado: misconduct. Añadido: misconduct, including when the President has submitted a proposal in line with Rule 176(7) following the establishment of an occurrence of harassment in accordance with the applicable internal administrative procedure on harassment and its prevention. Parliament shall take a decision on that proposal by a majority of …

  4. Enmienda 9 · Enmiendas al Reglamento internoRechazada

    Rule 21 - paragraph 2

    Presentada por Rainer Wieland · PPE

    Where a rapporteur Eliminado: breaches the provisions of the Code of Conduct for Members of the European Parliament regarding integrity and transparency13, Añadido: has been guilty of serious misconduct, the committee which appointed him or her may, at the initiative of … first paragraph shall apply mutatis mutandis to each stage of this procedure. Eliminado: 13See Annex I

  5. Enmienda 12 · Propuesta de DecisiónRechazada

    Paragraph 1 a (new)

    Presentada por Monika Hohlmeier, Christine Schneider · PPE

    Añadido: 1a. Emphasises that all groups should report alleged harassment cases and complaints to the Advisory Committee dealing with harassment complaints concerning Members of the European Parliament in order to enable an independent review and a complete investigation; is astonished how in a particular alleged case concerning a former Green MEP, Malte Gallée, his group failed to report this case to the relevant internal EP committees and structures; deplores the double standards of the Greens/EFA Group in the European Parliament, frequently calling for stronger official EP anti-harassment policies, but failing to implement the necessary procedures for such policies within their own Group; calls on the Greens Group to deliver all information and complaints to the official bodies regarding this and any other cases; underlines the importance that all political groups abide by the anti-harassment rules;

Voto por grupo político

Cómo votaron los grupos políticos

Miembros

Mostrando 10 de 705

Posición de voto
NombrePaísGrupoPosición de voto
EslovaquiaRenew
A favor
AlemaniaS&D
A favor
EspañaNI
A favor
LuxemburgoEPP
A favor
ItaliaS&D
A favor
ItaliaNI
A favor
LituaniaEPP
A favor
AlemaniaS&D
A favor
IrlandaNI
A favor
PoloniaEPP
A favor
Mostrar más
Síguenos en Instagram@checksomevotes@checksomevotes_en