Votación en el Parlamento Europeo

Modificación del Reglamento interno del Parlamento Europeo con vistas a la ejecución de la reforma parlamentaria «Parlamento 2024»

Salvatore De Meo - Après le § 56 - Am 120
Fecha: 10.04.2024·Referencia: A9-0158/2024
Ponente: Salvatore De Meo

Resultado general

Rechazada
  • 155 A favor
  • 419 En contra
  • 38 Abstención
  • 93 No votó
Enmienda— Estás viendo una subvotación (enmienda) de la votación principal.Enmienda 120 · Presentada por Verts/ALEVer la enmienda en el PE ↗
Texto de la enmienda

Presentada por Damian Boeselager

Añadido: Rule 56a Budgetary assessment on proposals for legally binding acts with budgetary implications 1. Without prejudice to the application of Rule 48, where a proposal for a legally binding act has implications for the Union budget, that proposal shall be referred by the President to the committee responsible for budgetary issues. That committee shall then issue a budgetary assessment of the proposal if it deems it appropriate or if so requested by the committee responsible for the subject-matter. This paragraph is without prejudice to the possibility for the committee responsible for budgetary issues to be authorised to submit opinions pursuant to Rule 56 or to act jointly with one or more committees pursuant to Rule 58. 2. The committee responsible for the subject-matter shall set a deadline within which the budgetary assessment is to be provided. Any changes to the announced timetable shall be immediately communicated to the committee responsible for budgetary issues. The committee responsible for the subject-matter shall not adopt its report before that deadline has expired. 3. In the budgetary assessment, the committee responsible for budgetary issues shall examine whether the proposal for a legally binding act provides for sufficient financial and human resources, and evaluate the potential impact of the financing proposed on other Union programmes or policies. It shall also determine whether the proposal is compatible with the multiannual financial framework, the system of own resources and the corresponding interinstitutional agreement, as well as the budgetary principles as laid down in the Financial Regulation. Where applicable, the committee responsible for budgetary issues shall also determine whether the proposal is compatible with Parliament’s position on any proposal to amend or replace that framework, that system, that agreement or those principles. 4. The budgetary assessment shall consist of an evaluation of the aspects of the proposal for a legally-binding act referred to in paragraph 3. The budgetary assessment may, where appropriate, also contain amendments to that proposal covering exclusively those aspects referred to in paragraph 3. Amendments on those aspects by the committee responsible for the subject-matter shall be inadmissible. The budgetary assessment, including the amendments, shall be integrated into the report as such. 5. Where a budgetary assessment is provided, the committee responsible for the subject-matter and the committee responsible for budgetary issues shall cooperate throughout the procedure to ensure full consistency between policy and budgetary objectives. To this end, they shall invite each other’s rapporteurs to their discussions within Parliament relating to the proposal for a legally binding act, including to the meetings between the rapporteurs and shadow rapporteurs. 6. Where a budgetary assessment is provided, the negotiating team referred to in Rule 74(1) shall include the rapporteur from the committee responsible for budgetary issues who shall lead the negotiations on the issues referred to in paragraph 3. Where a budgetary assessment is not provided, the committee responsible for the subject-matter may ask the committee responsible for budgetary issues to provide assistance to the negotiating team referred to in Rule 74(1) in relation to the aspects referred to in paragraph 3 at any stage of the interinstitutional negotiations.

Texto tal como lo publica el PE, en inglés. PE760.542

← Volver a la votación principal
Estado y procedimiento

Resultado según el Parlamento Europeo.

Votación celebrada el
Último paso documentado
Pleno · (hace 963 días)
Próximo paso previsto
La fuente no prevé ningún otro paso.

Desarrollo del procedimiento

2024/2000(REG) · REG

Actividades documentadas del procedimiento. No demuestran que una ley haya entrado en vigor.

  1. Documentado: Examen en comisión3 días hasta el siguiente paso
  2. Documentado: Remisión44 días hasta el siguiente paso
  3. Documentado: Examen en comisión5 días hasta el siguiente paso
  4. Último documentado: Pleno963 días desde el inicio de este paso
Actividades documentadas (6)
  1. Presentación del informe en comisión
  2. Remisión a comisión
  3. Aprobación del informe en comisión
  4. Presentación al pleno
  5. Votación en el pleno
  6. Resultados de la votación en el pleno
Actividades previstas (realización no confirmada)
  1. Votación en el pleno

Ficha del procedimiento (OEIL) · Datos del Parlamento Europeo
Consultado:

Fuentes

Datos: EP Open Data API

Voto por grupo político

Cómo votaron los grupos políticos

Miembros

Mostrando 10 de 705

Posición de voto
NombrePaísGrupoPosición de voto
SueciaGreens/EFA
A favor
AlemaniaGreens/EFA
A favor
AlemaniaNI
A favor
AlemaniaRenew
A favor
PoloniaEPP
A favor
FranciaGreens/EFA
A favor
FranciaEPP
Voto previstoEn contraVoto emitido: A favor
BélgicaNI
A favor
LituaniaEPP
A favor
AlemaniaGreens/EFA
A favor
Mostrar más
Síguenos en Instagram@checksomevotes@checksomevotes_en