Votación en el Parlamento Europeo

Orientaciones para el presupuesto 2025: sección III

Dragoş Pîslaru - Propuesta de Resolución (conjunto del texto)
Fecha: 13.03.2024·Referencia: A9-0068/2024
Ponente: Victor Negrescu

Resultado general

Aprobada
  • 380 A favor
  • 102 En contra
  • 100 Abstención
  • 123 No votó
Estado y procedimiento

Resultado según el Parlamento Europeo.

Votación celebrada el
Último paso documentado
Pleno · (hace 983 días)
Próximo paso previsto
La fuente no prevé ningún otro paso.

Desarrollo del procedimiento

2023/2220(BUI) · BUI

Actividades documentadas del procedimiento. No demuestran que una ley haya entrado en vigor.

  1. Documentado: Examen en comisión47 días hasta el siguiente paso
  2. Último documentado: Pleno983 días desde el inicio de este paso
Actividades documentadas (17)
  1. Presentación del informe en comisión
  2. Aprobación de la opinión en comisión
  3. Aprobación de la opinión en comisión
  4. Aprobación de la opinión en comisión
  5. Aprobación de la opinión en comisión
  6. Aprobación de la opinión en comisión
  7. Aprobación de la opinión en comisión
  8. Aprobación de la opinión en comisión
  9. Aprobación de la opinión en comisión
  10. Aprobación de la opinión en comisión
  11. Aprobación de la opinión en comisión
  12. Aprobación de la opinión en comisión
  13. Aprobación del informe en comisión
  14. Presentación al pleno
  15. Debate en el pleno
  16. Votación en el pleno
  17. Resultados de la votación en el pleno
Actividades previstas (realización no confirmada)
  1. Debate en el pleno
  2. Votación en el pleno

Ficha del procedimiento (OEIL) · Datos del Parlamento Europeo
Consultado:

Fuentes

Datos: EP Open Data API

¿De qué se trata?

  • Presupuesto 2025 como herramienta de inversión para prioridades de la UE.
  • Enfoque en neutralidad climática , competitividad y justicia social.
  • Crítica a la revisión del Marco Financiero Plurianual y demanda de nuevos recursos propios.
Fuente: Resumen generado por IA con Mistral

Historial de enmiendas (31)

Texto tal como lo publica el PE, en inglés.

  1. Enmienda 4Rechazada

    Paragraph -1 c (new)

    Presentada por João Pimenta Lopes, Sandra Pereira, Manu Pineda · The Left

    Añadido: -1c. Considers that, in the current circumstances, the main objectives to be pursued by mobilising funds from the EU budget should be: fostering proper employment and the creation of jobs with rights, combating poverty and social exclusion, furthering investment in productive and strategic sectors, promoting the sovereignty of Member States, particularly food and energy, protecting the environment and biodiversity, and supporting the reception and integration of all refugees and migrants;

  2. Enmienda 5Rechazada

    Paragraph 12 a (new)

    Presentada por João Pimenta Lopes, Sandra Pereira, Manu Pineda · The Left

    Añadido: 12a. Considering the spiralling cost of living and its marked impact on workers and their families, rising inequalities and social injustices, rocketing poverty and social deprivation levels, the amount allocated ESF+ needs to be ramped up to help to address these problems.

  3. Enmienda 6Rechazada

    Paragraph 12 b (new)

    Presentada por João Pimenta Lopes, Sandra Pereira, Manu Pineda · The Left

    Añadido: 12b. Calls for the requisite amounts to be made available, whether by bolstering existing instruments and/or by establishing new instruments, with a view to supporting Member States in their efforts to invest and provide affordable public housing, thus helping to protect the fundamental right to decent, high-quality and accessible housing for all;

  4. Enmienda 7Rechazada

    Paragraph 24 a (new)

    Presentada por João Pimenta Lopes, Sandra Pereira, Manu Pineda · The Left

    Añadido: 24a. Calls on the Commission to support the Member States in preventing and combating violence in its many forms and root causes and, at the same time, to adopt specific measures for each of its aspects, while safeguarding the balance of rights between men and women in all spheres of life: the right to physical and moral integrity, the right to legal protection and access to the courts to defend their rights; calls on the Commission to help the Member States to ramp up free, high-quality public health services, particularly services concerning sexual and reproductive rights and support for women victims of violence, and also by increasing the number of shelters and places, with specialised support for women with different nationalities and in a range of languages; takes the view, in this connection, that the financial envelope for the Daphne programme must be stepped up; takes the view that it is equally important to step up the financial envelope for the European Institute for Gender Equality (EIGE);

  5. Enmienda 8Rechazada

    Paragraph 26 a (new)

    Presentada por João Pimenta Lopes, Sandra Pereira, Manu Pineda · The Left

    Añadido: 26a. Calls for programmes supporting culture to be stepped up and for new budget lines to be established that protect and promote cultural diversity and boost and democratise artistic creation and enjoyment, along with access to culture;

  6. Enmienda 10Rechazada

    Paragraph 26 c (new)

    Presentada por João Pimenta Lopes, Sandra Pereira, Manu Pineda · The Left

    Añadido: 26c. Rejects the increase in the budget allocations for militarisation, specifically, for arms, infrastructure, capacity and military mobility; rejects the ongoing growing militarisation of the EU; calls strongly for funds from the EU budget for external action (with the exception of official development aid), border surveillance and externalisation, militarisation and security communitisation programmes to be reallocated to help Member States to improve the economic and social state of affairs on the basis of the principle of economic and social cohesion, i.e. with a view to achieving convergence in economic and social progress;

  7. Enmienda 12Rechazada

    Paragraph 29 b (new)

    Presentada por João Pimenta Lopes, Sandra Pereira, Manu Pineda · The Left

    Añadido: 29b. Calls, furthermore, for the creation of a properly funded specific financial instrument to support the Member States and all organisations that have obligations arising from the nature restoration measures established in the regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on nature restoration; considers that such an instrument should include at least the following aspects: direct help for restoration measures, support for workers and micro-, small and medium-sized businesses and producers that may be affected, support for assessing the ecological and plant health of forests and for reforestation by native species, particularly in the countries hit hardest by forest fires;

  8. Enmienda 13Rechazada

    Paragraph 31 a (new)

    Presentada por João Pimenta Lopes, Sandra Pereira, Manu Pineda · The Left

    Añadido: 31a. Calls for an increase in the amounts for public investment in transport infrastructure and the promotion of public transport and sustainable mobility; calls for account to be taken of the urgent need for support for local and regional transport infrastructure in the Member States and not only cross-border links, with a particular focus on railways; rejects the use of the EU budget to strengthen public-private partnerships, promote privatisation and liberalise the sector;

  9. Enmienda 14Rechazada

    Paragraph 33 a (new)

    Presentada por João Pimenta Lopes, Sandra Pereira, Manu Pineda · The Left

    Añadido: 33a. Calls for specific programmes for farming to be stepped up with a view to fostering sustainable farming in every Member State and a farming industry capable of responding to the most pressing challenges, such as drought, the production shortfall and speculative increases in input costs, particularly by means of direct support for producers and, in the medium term, permanent support for green electricity and financing for small irrigation works, including the installation of ponds designed to retain water; calls for the decision to cut support under the small farmers scheme to be reversed; calls, further, for projects financed under the EU budget to foster short marketing channels and fair, stable and decent remuneration for producers and for the common agricultural policy to reflect fair distribution among countries, producers and types of production, doing away with the current disparities and benefiting in relative terms Member States with the highest production deficits;

  10. Enmienda 15Rechazada

    Paragraph 33 b (new)

    Presentada por João Pimenta Lopes, Sandra Pereira, Manu Pineda · The Left

    Añadido: 33b. Calls for support to be made available to the fisheries sector to enable it to address, in an ambitious and practical manner, the rise in production costs faced by fisheries, particularly small-scale, artisanal and coastal fisheries; calls for the EMFAF to focus on improving fleets’ safety and working, health and hygiene conditions on board, on establishing compensation and income support mechanisms for fishers in the light of the instability of the profession, and on supporting an integrated maritime policy (promoting marine research and the development of maritime technology and engineering in all its forms, including the building of more environmentally sustainable ships, and port infrastructure under public management, which supports fishing, thus modernising the sector, ensuring the sector’s socio-economic viability and the sustainability of resources and protecting the outermost regions’ role and specific characteristics);

  11. Enmienda 16Rechazada

    Paragraph 45 a (new)

    Presentada por João Pimenta Lopes, Sandra Pereira, Manu Pineda · The Left

    Añadido: 45a. Calls for the EU-Israel Association Agreement to be suspended, bearing in mind the prerogatives the agreement contains, following Israel’s brutal aggression against the Palestinian people; calls for the cancellation of Horizon 2020 funds that could be used in military or dual-use projects;

  12. Enmienda 17Rechazada

    Paragraph 46 a (new)

    Presentada por João Pimenta Lopes, Sandra Pereira, Manu Pineda · The Left

    Añadido: 46a. Calls for greater support for the United Nations Relief and Works Agency for Palestine Refugees in the Near East (UNRWA) to ensure proper funding so it can carry on and step up its humanitarian work saving lives;

  13. Enmienda 18Rechazada

    Paragraph 47 a (new)

    Presentada por João Pimenta Lopes, Sandra Pereira, Manu Pineda · The Left

    Añadido: 47a. Calls for a significant stepping up of the budget lines on cohesion, which have been gradually cut from one budget to the next;

  14. Enmienda 19Rechazada

    Paragraph 47 b (new)

    Presentada por João Pimenta Lopes, Sandra Pereira, Manu Pineda · The Left

    Añadido: 47b. Calls for support for the outermost regions to be stepped up, particularly the programme of options specifically relating to remoteness and insularity (POSEI), for the POSEI fisheries scheme to be reinstated and for a POSEI transport scheme to be established with a view to providing additional support to compensate for the drawbacks of and losses caused by remoteness;

  15. Enmienda 21Rechazada

    Paragraph 1

    Presentada por Dimitrios Papadimoulis · The Left

    … change, financial pressure, climate change and societal challenges, a reliable, robust, flexible, Añadido: people-centred and investment oriented EU budget remain instrumental for the implementation of the Union’s … transitions, in delivering prosperity and security for people and in boosting the Añadido: sustainability and competitiveness of the EU economy;

  16. Enmienda 22Rechazada

    Paragraph 4

    Presentada por Dimitrios Papadimoulis · The Left

    4. Eliminado: Considers Añadido: Regrets that the outcome of the MFF revision Eliminado: to be below Añadido: falls significantly short of the initial aspirations of the Eliminado: EP; underscores Añadido: EP as well as of the Commission’s proposal; acknowledges that a revision of the MFF regulation is an essential prerequisite for ensuring medium-term financial support to Eliminado: Ukraine, Añadido: Ukraine and for enabling increased funding for targeted policy priorities, including the promotion of the EU’s strategic Eliminado: autonomy, Añadido: autonomy; stresses, however, that greater provision should have been made for avoiding cuts and for safeguarding Union programmes and the budget’s flexibility in the light …

  17. Enmienda 23Rechazada

    Paragraph 12

    Presentada por Dimitrios Papadimoulis · The Left

    … dimension of EU spending, as a necessary feature for its legitimacy, should Eliminado: continue to be a Añadido: become a prominent cross-cutting criterion for all policy areas;

  18. Enmienda 24Rechazada

    Paragraph 12 a (new)

    Presentada por Marc Botenga, Manu Pineda · The Left

    Añadido: 12a. Calls on the Commission to allocate funds to essential social services, such as healthcare, education and affordable housing, in order to directly support the working class rather than increasing unconditional subsidies for large, arms-producing multinationals;

  19. Enmienda 25Rechazada

    Paragraph 18

    Presentada por Dimitrios Papadimoulis · The Left

    … the European Pillar of Social Rights and calls on the Commission to Eliminado: start reflections on a Añadido: develop a robust methodology for tracking social expenditure in the EU budget Eliminado: under the next programming period; Añadido: based on the principles of the Pillar; highlights the crucial role of the EU budget in contributing to initiatives …

  20. Enmienda 26Rechazada

    Paragraph 24

    Presentada por Dimitrios Papadimoulis · The Left

    … necessary resources should be devoted to fighting gender-based violence and to supporting Eliminado: rights and Añadido: universal access to safe sexual and reproductive health Eliminado: services, Añadido: services and rights, to women’s rights organisations, as well as EU initiatives and bodies tackling Eliminado: discrimination against women; Añadido: discrimination, notably against women and the LGBTIQ+ community; calls on the Commission to facilitate access to the CERV programme as …

  21. Enmienda 27Rechazada

    Paragraph 36 a (new)

    Presentada por Bogdan Rzońca · ECR

    Añadido: 36a. Stresses the urgent need to ensure the effective control of the EU’s external land and sea borders; strongly supports, therefore, EU budget contributions to finance the building of fences at the EU’s external borders; calls on the Commission to mobilise additional EU funds and means to support the Member States in reinforcing their border protection capabilities and infrastructure, including border crossing points, means of surveillance, such as aerial surveillance, and equipment; strongly condemns any attempts to instrumentalise migrants;

  22. Enmienda 31Rechazada

    Paragraph 24 a (new)

    Presentada por Joachim Kuhs, Valentino Grant, Eric Minardi +1 · ID

    Añadido: 24a. Expresses its deep concern regarding the fact that the Commission has financed or co-financed campaigns promoting the Islamic veil, claiming, for example, that ‘freedom is in the hijab’; stresses that the Union budget must not finance any future campaign likely to promote the veil or indirectly trivialising the compulsory wearing of the veil;

  23. Enmienda 32Rechazada

    Paragraph 33 a (new)

    Presentada por Joachim Kuhs, Valentino Grant, Eric Minardi +1 · ID

    Añadido: 33a. Calls for the EU not to undermine the European market of agricultural products by signing free-trade agreements with countries such as the Mercosur countries, which go against the interest of European farmers and create unfair competition; underlines that these actions hinder the significant efforts made by European farmers to meet environmental and higher quality standards;

  24. Enmienda 33Rechazada

    Paragraph 35 a (new)

    Presentada por Joachim Kuhs, Valentino Grant, Eric Minardi +1 · ID

    Añadido: 35a. Underlines the failure of EU policies to prevent migration flows and human trafficking; reiterates its concerns about the use of funding allocated for migration, asylum and border protection and the role played by instruments such as the Internal Security Fund and the AMIF, which should, foremost, guarantee the proper implementation of a rigorous asylum policy in accordance with international law while blocking illegal immigration and ensuring border protection and an effective return and readmission policy;

  25. Enmienda 34Rechazada

    Paragraph 40 a (new)

    Presentada por Joachim Kuhs, Valentino Grant, Eric Minardi +1 · ID

    Añadido: 40a. Calls for an immediate stop to the Union’s accession negotiations with Türkiye and the prompt suspension of the funding provided to that country, since Türkiye does not respect several of the basic principles of freedom and democracy and has stepped up its aggressive behaviour in the Mediterranean area and beyond, which is beginning to pose a real threat to many Member States;

  26. Enmienda 35Rechazada

    Paragraph 42 a (new)

    Presentada por Joachim Kuhs, Valentino Grant, Eric Minardi +1 · ID

    Añadido: 42a. Stresses that any funding under the NDICI should be made conditional on the effective implementation of return and readmission agreements;

  27. Enmienda 36Rechazada

    Paragraph 46 a (new)

    Presentada por Joachim Kuhs, Valentino Grant, Eric Minardi +1 · ID

    Añadido: 46a. Calls for the suspension of EU funding to UNRWA, following several allegations regarding the involvement of UNRWA staff in the brutal attack by Hamas against Israel in October 2023;

  28. Enmienda 38Rechazada

    Paragraph 50 a (new)

    Presentada por Moritz Körner, Włodzimierz Cimoszewicz, Tomáš Zdechovský +43 · Members

    Añadido: 50a. Requests that the Commission ensure that entities that provide financial support to individuals for the reason that these individuals committed or attempted to commit a terrorist act, or are related to someone who committed or attempted to commit a terrorist act, are not eligible for EU funding; this restriction shall also apply to the EU funding of third parties that directly or indirectly contribute to the financing of such entities;

  29. Enmienda 39Rechazada

    Paragraph 44 a (new)

    Presentada por Moritz Körner, Włodzimierz Cimoszewicz, Tomáš Zdechovský +39 · Members

    Añadido: 44a. Calls on the Commission to require all recipients of EU funds in the Middle East and North Africa (MENA) region to sign a declaration in which they recognise Israel’s right to exist and condemn antisemitism; requests that the Commission suspend all payments to recipients that a) refuse to sign such a declaration, b) despite signing it, act against the spirit of such a declaration, or c) directly or indirectly contribute to the financing of beneficiaries that act against the spirit of such a declaration;

  30. Enmienda 40Aprobada

    Paragraph 42 a (new)

    Presentada por Moritz Körner, Włodzimierz Cimoszewicz, Tomáš Zdechovský +43 · Members

    Añadido: 42a. Regrets that the Commission has not conditioned payments to third countries more effectively as a means to enforce the Union’s geopolitical interests, in particular in relation to the Union’s migration policies, defence concerns, as well as in relation to human rights; calls on the Commission to set specific conditions and milestones for its payments to third countries in accordance with the particular political interests of the Union and to suspend without undue delay a relevant part of the payments if a third country fails to meet the set conditions; expects all responsible Commissioners-designate in their hearings to commit to this stricter interest-based conditioning of the EU budget towards third countries;

  31. Enmienda 41Rechazada

    Paragraph 46

    Presentada por Moritz Körner, Włodzimierz Cimoszewicz, Tomáš Zdechovský +38 · Members

    … funds by beneficiaries must respect EU rules and safeguards and international law; Eliminado: welcomes, in this regards, that the Commission’s review of EU aid to Palestine concluded that the controls and existing and effective safeguards in place work well and that no evidence has been found to date that money has been diverted for unintended purposes, as well as the risk assessment and related additional measures; Añadido: supports the efforts made by the EU and its Member States to provide humanitarian assistance to the people in need in the Middle East region; requests, therefore, that EU funds which in the past were provided to UNRWA should in future be provided to the UN Development Programme (UNDP), the World Food Programme (WFP) and the UN Refugee Agency (UNHCR);

Voto por grupo político

Cómo votaron los grupos políticos

Miembros

Mostrando 10 de 705

Posición de voto
NombrePaísGrupoPosición de voto
CroaciaEPP
A favor
AlemaniaGreens/EFA
A favor
AlemaniaNI
A favor
PoloniaEPP
A favor
FranciaNI
A favor
SueciaGreens/EFA
A favor
HungríaNI
A favor
GreciaNI
A favor
CroaciaRenew
A favor
PoloniaEPP
A favor
Mostrar más
Síguenos en Instagram@checksomevotes@checksomevotes_en