Votación en el Parlamento Europeo

Banco Central Europeo: Informe Anual 2023

Fecha: 27.02.2024·Referencia: A9-0412/2023
Ponente: Johan Van Overtveldt

Resultado general

Aprobada
  • 418 A favor
  • 157 En contra
  • 42 Abstención
  • 88 No votó
Estado y procedimiento

Resultado según el Parlamento Europeo.

Votación celebrada el
Último paso documentado
Pleno · (hace 1068 días)
Próximo paso previsto
La fuente no prevé ningún otro paso.

Desarrollo del procedimiento

2023/2064(INI) · INI

Actividades documentadas del procedimiento. No demuestran que una ley haya entrado en vigor.

  1. Documentado: Remisión120 días hasta el siguiente paso
  2. Documentado: Examen en comisión94 días hasta el siguiente paso
  3. Último documentado: Pleno1068 días desde el inicio de este paso
Actividades documentadas (7)
  1. Remisión a comisión
  2. Presentación del informe en comisión
  3. Aprobación del informe en comisión
  4. Presentación al pleno
  5. Debate en el pleno
  6. Votación en el pleno
  7. Resultados de la votación en el pleno
Actividades previstas (realización no confirmada)
  1. Debate en el pleno
  2. Votación en el pleno

Ficha del procedimiento (OEIL) · Datos del Parlamento Europeo
Consultado:

Fuentes

Datos: EP Open Data API

Historial de enmiendas (9)

Texto tal como lo publica el PE, en inglés.

  1. Enmienda 1Aprobada

    Paragraph 24 a (new)

    Presentada por Sven Simon · PPE

    Añadido: 24a. Expresses grave concern at recent media reports of political bias within the ECB regarding the so-called greening of policies; recalls that an undeterred focus on the ECB’s mandate of price stability is of paramount importance for the integrity and public support of the institution; notes the importance of pluralism for the institutional culture of the ECB; calls on the ECB to investigate and swiftly address any suspicions of ideological bias;

  2. Enmienda 6Rechazada

    Paragraph 5 a (new)

    Presentada por Manon Aubry · The Left

    Añadido: 5a. Calls on the ECB to convert its government debt holdings into zero-rate perpetual debt;

  3. Enmienda 7Rechazada

    Paragraph 22 a (new)

    Presentada por Bas Eickhout · Verts/ALE

    Añadido: 22a. Notes that a successful green transition can help alleviate future inflationary pressures by reducing physical risk and the dependence on fossil fuels; is concerned, in this regard, that high interest rates disproportionately affect green investments owing to higher up front capital costs; notes that national central banks in the Eurosystem have, in the past, implemented differentiated interest rates, for example, to benefit export credits; encourages the ECB to consider the introduction of differentiated interest rates; notes recent endorsements of that approach from civil society, academia and the French President;

  4. Enmienda 11Aprobada

    Recital B b (new)

    Presentada por Sandra Pereira, João Pimenta Lopes · The Left

    Añadido: Bb. whereas the 10 consecutive increases in reference interest rates are having particularly damaging effects on the solvency of households and microenterprises and SMEs in countries which predominantly use variable interest rate models;

  5. Enmienda 13Rechazada

    Recital C b (new)

    Presentada por João Pimenta Lopes, Sandra Pereira · The Left

    Añadido: Cb. whereas the increase in reference interest rates is leading to greater financial margins in the banking sector, depending on levels of concentration in it;

  6. Enmienda 14Rechazada

    Paragraph -1 (new)

    Presentada por João Pimenta Lopes, Sandra Pereira · The Left

    Añadido: 1. Considers it imperative for the European Central Bank to reverse its increases to reference interest rates;

  7. Enmienda 15Rechazada

    Paragraph -1 a (new)

    Presentada por João Pimenta Lopes, Sandra Pereira · The Left

    Añadido: 1a. Takes the view that, in the immediate future, it should be the banking sector’s profits that absorb the rise in reference interest rates on mortgages;

  8. Enmienda 16Rechazada

    Paragraph -1 b (new)

    Presentada por João Pimenta Lopes, Sandra Pereira · The Left

    Añadido: 1b. Takes the view that combating inflation should not entail squeezing demand or family incomes, but rather increasing salaries and pensions; regulating the prices of essential goods and services; fighting speculation; taxing the profits of large economic groups and using the proceeds to promote development and social progress; boosting national output of both consumer goods and production assets, including in the energy sector, making the most of renewable energies to guarantee greater energy sovereignty and stability in supply chains; promoting peace, political solutions of conflicts and the sovereign development of states;

  9. Enmienda 17Rechazada

    Paragraph -1 c (new)

    Presentada por João Pimenta Lopes, Sandra Pereira · The Left

    Añadido: 1c. Takes the view that the current socio-economic situation, an inevitable corollary of the ECB’s deciding to make 10 consecutive interest rate rises, shows that the euro deprives states of the monetary, financial, exchange-rate and, to a large extent, budgetary policy instruments with which to promote a form of development that takes account of their specific national realities and the necessary policy responses to the social and economic problems that have arisen;

Voto por grupo político

Cómo votaron los grupos políticos

Miembros

Mostrando 10 de 705

Posición de voto
NombrePaísGrupoPosición de voto
FranciaEPP
A favor
AlemaniaEPP
A favor
BulgariaRenew
A favor
EspañaS&D
A favor
LituaniaRenew
A favor
EslovaquiaRenew
A favor
MaltaS&D
A favor
PoloniaECR
A favor
LuxemburgoEPP
A favor
RumaníaRenew
A favor
Mostrar más
Síguenos en Instagram@checksomevotes@checksomevotes_en