Votación en el Parlamento Europeo

Actividades del Defensor del Pueblo Europeo: informe anual 2022

Fecha: 17.01.2024·Referencia: A9-0414/2023
Ponente: Peter Jahr

Resultado general

Aprobada
  • 543 A favor
  • 12 En contra
  • 64 Abstención
  • 86 No votó
Estado y procedimiento

Resultado según el Parlamento Europeo.

Votación celebrada el
Último paso documentado
Pleno · (hace 1072 días)
Próximo paso previsto
La fuente no prevé ningún otro paso.

Desarrollo del procedimiento

2023/2120(INI) · INI

Actividades documentadas del procedimiento. No demuestran que una ley haya entrado en vigor.

  1. Documentado: Remisión82 días hasta el siguiente paso
  2. Documentado: Examen en comisión66 días hasta el siguiente paso
  3. Último documentado: Pleno1072 días desde el inicio de este paso
Actividades documentadas (7)
  1. Remisión a comisión
  2. Presentación del informe en comisión
  3. Aprobación del informe en comisión
  4. Presentación al pleno
  5. Debate en el pleno
  6. Votación en el pleno
  7. Resultados de la votación en el pleno
Actividades previstas (realización no confirmada)
  1. Debate en el pleno
  2. Votación en el pleno

Ficha del procedimiento (OEIL) · Datos del Parlamento Europeo
Consultado:

Fuentes

Datos: EP Open Data API

Historial de enmiendas (6)

Texto tal como lo publica el PE, en inglés.

  1. Enmienda 1Rechazada

    Recital O

    Presentada por Cristian Terheş · ECR

    … significant delays in how the Commission handles requests for public access to Eliminado: documents; Añadido: documents, including documents concerning the purchase of COVID-19 vaccines; whereas the Ombudsman found maladministration in the Commission’s way of handling such …

  2. Enmienda 2Rechazada

    Recital P a (new)

    Presentada por Cristian Terheş · ECR

    Añadido: Pa. whereas in 2022 the Ombudsman continued to receive a large number of complaints related to the COVID-19 pandemic, predominantly concerning measures national authorities had put in place in response to the pandemic and the right to move freely within the EU; whereas the Ombudsman replied even to the complaints that were out of mandate and to all those seeking help in the language of their complaint or in the language of their preference by clarifying the Ombudsman’s mandate and, as far as possible, advising complainants to turn to other bodies1a; 1a European Ombudsman, ‘Annual Report 2022’, 25 April 2023.

  3. Enmienda 3Rechazada

    Recital P b (new)

    Presentada por Cristian Terheş · ECR

    Añadido: Pb. whereas in 2022 the Ombudsman determined that the manner in which the Commission addressed a request for public access to documents related to the quality of medical masks distributed during the COVID-19 pandemic1a constituted maladministration; whereas this judgment is grounded in the Commission’s failure to grant complete access to three pending documents and the consequential issue that, due to the Commission’s stalling for nearly two years, the complainant is currently unable to utilise the disclosed information for its originally intended purpose; 1a European Ombudsman decision of 25 May 2022 on how the European Commission handled a request for public access to documents concerning the quality of medical masks distributed during the COVID-19 pandemic (case 790/2021/MIG).

  4. Enmienda 4Rechazada

    Recital T a (new)

    Presentada por Cristian Terheş · ECR

    Añadido: Ta. whereas in 2022, noticing the flagrant absence of public information, the Ombudsman asked the Commission how it would ensure transparency in the negotiations of national recovery plans, how it would guarantee public scrutiny of milestones reached by Member States, and how it would supervise the audits1a; 1a European Ombudsman, ‘Ombudsman asks Commission how it will ensure accountability of recovery fund spending’, 28 February 2022.

  5. Enmienda 5Rechazada

    Paragraph 2 a (new)

    Presentada por Cristian Terheş · ECR

    Añadido: 2a. Congratulates the European Ombudsman for her exemplary efforts during the pandemic years in safeguarding the rights of citizens against the unprecedented abuses by the Commission and in investigating the Commission’s refusal to provide access to documents and text messages related to the negotiation of COVID-19 vaccine purchase contracts using public funds;

  6. Enmienda 6Rechazada

    Paragraph 14 a (new)

    Presentada por Cristian Terheş · ECR

    Añadido: 14a. Calls on the Ombudsman to persist in urging the Commission to immediately publish the unredacted contracts related to the procurement of COVID-19 vaccines;

Voto por grupo político

Cómo votaron los grupos políticos

Miembros

Mostrando 10 de 705

Posición de voto
NombrePaísGrupoPosición de voto
AlemaniaRenew
A favor
IrlandaRenew
A favor
HungríaS&D
A favor
ItaliaNI
A favor
FranciaNI
A favor
GreciaNI
A favor
FranciaGreens/EFA
A favor
RumaníaRenew
A favor
Países BajosRenew
A favor
SueciaNI
A favor
Mostrar más
Síguenos en Instagram@checksomevotes@checksomevotes_en