Votación en el Parlamento Europeo

Unión bancaria: informe anual 2023

Ivars Ijabs – Motion for a resolution (text as a whole)
Fecha: 16.01.2024·Referencia: A9-0431/2023
Ponente: Ivars Ijabs

Resultado general

Aprobada
  • 372 A favor
  • 115 En contra
  • 132 Abstención
  • 86 No votó
Estado y procedimiento

Resultado según el Parlamento Europeo.

Votación celebrada el
Último paso documentado
Pleno · (hace 1067 días)
Próximo paso previsto
La fuente no prevé ningún otro paso.

Desarrollo del procedimiento

2023/2078(INI) · INI

Actividades documentadas del procedimiento. No demuestran que una ley haya entrado en vigor.

  1. Documentado: Remisión90 días hasta el siguiente paso
  2. Documentado: Examen en comisión90 días hasta el siguiente paso
  3. Último documentado: Pleno1067 días desde el inicio de este paso
Actividades documentadas (6)
  1. Remisión a comisión
  2. Presentación del informe en comisión
  3. Aprobación del informe en comisión
  4. Presentación al pleno
  5. Votación en el pleno
  6. Resultados de la votación en el pleno
Actividades previstas (realización no confirmada)
  1. Votación en el pleno

Ficha del procedimiento (OEIL) · Datos del Parlamento Europeo
Consultado:

Fuentes

Datos: EP Open Data API

¿De qué se trata?

  • Unión Bancaria requiere EDIS para su culminación.
  • BCE y SRB mejoran resiliencia del sector bancario.
  • Bancos deben aplicar sanciones contra Rusia.
Fuente: Resumen generado por IA con Mistral

Historial de enmiendas (4)

Texto tal como lo publica el PE, en inglés.

  1. Enmienda 1Rechazada

    Recital H

    Presentada por Philippe Lamberts · Verts/ALE

    H. Eliminado: whereas the lack of cross-border consolidation of the EU banking sector is affecting its global competitiveness and consumer banking in some Member States is still dominated by a small number of banks; whereas the profitability gap between EU and US banks has widened during … return on equity is 5 points lower than that of US banks’4; Añadido: whereas institutions deemed ‘too big to fail’ continue to pose systemic risks to the European financial system because of their size, complexity and interconnectedness; 4 De Vito, L. et al., Understanding the profitability gap between euro …

  2. Enmienda 2Rechazada

    Paragraph 9

    Presentada por Philippe Lamberts · Verts/ALE

    9. Eliminado: Calls on the Commission to assess impediments to cross-border mergers as well as potential incentives for ring fencing; takes note that, according to a public statement by Andrea Enria, Chair of the ECB Supervisory Board, the banking sector is still, by and large, a collection of national banking sectors; notes that a more integrated EU banking sector could enhance banks’ ability to undertake strategic investments and foster the development of EU capital markets, while acknowledging that the diversity of banking business models in the euro area enhances the resilience of the financial system; notes Añadido: Notes the risks that ‘too big to fail’ institutions Eliminado: could entail, and notes that financial stability could be increased by a Añadido: entail, and calls for a structural reform of EU G-SIBs that addresses moral hazard risks Eliminado: highlights that cross-border consolidation without excessive concentration could increase the profitability of the EU banking sector, and potentially improve the current situation of reduced services offered and increased costs for citizens in many Member States; Añadido: and contributes to financial stability;

  3. Enmienda 3Rechazada

    Paragraph 12 a (new)

    Presentada por Philippe Lamberts · Verts/ALE

    Añadido: 12a. Recalls that fossil fuel asset values are set to collapse; recalls that the collapse of fossil fuel asset values could trigger a major financial crisis; calls for higher capital charges to be set for fossil fuel investments, including by applying a risk weight of 1 250 % to new fossil fuel exposures and ensuring that such investments are fully equity funded;

  4. Enmienda 4Rechazada

    Paragraph 25

    Presentada por Philippe Lamberts · Verts/ALE

    25. Eliminado: Welcomes Añadido: Notes the agreement reached at interinstitutional level to implement Basel III standards in the EU; Eliminado: underlines that the framework will deliver different levels of increase in prudential requirements depending on banks’ reliance on the use of internal models to calculate their risk-weights; highlights that the new rules have strengthened and better specified proportionality in banking supervision and will continue to increase financial stability in the EU; underlines the importance of a level playing field between jurisdictions; Añadido: calls for the co-legislators to reconsider the deviations from international prudential standards which they have introduced, given that new risks have emerged since the adoption of the Basel III framework; recalls that the specificities of EU banks were taken into account in the calibration of Basel capital requirements;

Voto por grupo político

Cómo votaron los grupos políticos

Miembros

Mostrando 10 de 705

Posición de voto
NombrePaísGrupoPosición de voto
RumaníaRenew
A favor
EspañaS&D
A favor
EspañaEPP
A favor
AlemaniaEPP
A favor
LituaniaEPP
A favor
FranciaRenew
A favor
EstoniaS&D
A favor
BulgariaRenew
A favor
IrlandaEPP
A favor
GreciaEPP
A favor
Mostrar más
Síguenos en Instagram@checksomevotes@checksomevotes_en