Evaluation of the Common Fisheries Policy and follow-up

Wording as published by the EP, in English.

1. Amendment 1 · Motion for a resolution B10-0386/2026 (PPE, S&D, ECR, Renew)Rejected

   Recital G (new)

   Tabled by Anja Hazekamp · The Left

   Added: G. whereas the Commission’s evaluation of the CFP concludes that discarding fish remains a structural feature of many fisheries, especially mixed fisheries; whereas a substantial proportion of discarded fish die after release; whereas undocumented discards are not deducted from quota and contribute to overfishing and decline of fish populations;

2. Amendment 2 · Motion for a resolution B10-0386/2026 (PPE, S&D, ECR, Renew)Rejected

   Paragraph 1

   Tabled by Anja Hazekamp · The Left

   … commitment to, or a timetable or measures for, follow-up actions, including concrete Removed: reforms to address the shortcomings identified in the evaluation; Added: actions to achieve better implementation and counter illegal practices, such as discarding undersized fish, and misreporting; believes that the follow-up must address the operational problems faced by fishers …

3. Amendment 3 · Motion for a resolution B10-0386/2026 (PPE, S&D, ECR, Renew)Rejected

   Paragraph 1 a (new)

   Tabled by Anja Hazekamp · The Left

   Added: 1a. Emphasises that healthy and resilient oceans are essential for marine biodiversity, food security and the long-term future of fishing communities, and must be preserved for current and future generations, which requires the implementation of conservation measures;

4. Amendment 4 · Motion for a resolution B10-0386/2026 (PPE, S&D, ECR, Renew)Rejected

   Paragraph 2

   Tabled by Anja Hazekamp · The Left

   … changed since 2013 and, in the light of the evaluation, considers that Removed: this requires an ambitious, targeted and timely revision; Added: better implementation of the CFP is needed in order to restore and maintain healthy fish populations and a healthy ocean;

5. Amendment 5 · Motion for a resolution B10-0386/2026 (PPE, S&D, ECR, Renew)Rejected

   Paragraph 4

   Tabled by Anja Hazekamp · The Left

   4. Regrets the Removed: practical difficulties encountered in the Added: lack of implementation of the landing obligation, particularly in mixed fisheries and in situations where choke species generate disproportionate socio-economic consequences; Added: stresses that in the case of a serious threat to the conservation of marine resources, the Commission may take emergency measures, including temporary closures of fisheries; calls on the Commission to address these shortcomings by proposing alternative management …