Vote in the European Parliament
The EU Youth Strategy 2019-2027
Overall Result
Adopted- 477 For
- 124 Against
- 66 Abstention
- 50 Did not vote
How we count
- Yes, No and Abstention come from the European Parliament's roll-call voting protocol.
- “Did not vote” is derived: MEPs with a mandate on the voting day for whom no vote was recorded. Abstentions do not count towards this.
- Subsequent vote corrections are shown but do not change the official result.
- Each vote (overall vote, amendment, partial vote) counts separately. Therefore totals may differ from pages that count differently.
Status and procedure
Outcome as recorded by the European Parliament.
- Vote held on
- Latest recorded step
- Plenary · (94 days ago)
- Next scheduled step
- No further step is scheduled in the source.
Procedure timeline
2025/2115(INI) · INI
Recorded procedure activities. These do not establish whether a law has entered into force.
- Recorded: Referral
- Recorded: Committee stage
- Latest recorded: Plenary
Recorded activities (13)
- Referral to committee
- Committee report tabled
- Committee amendments tabled
- Committee opinion adopted
- Committee opinion adopted
- Committee report adopted
- Tabling for plenary
- Tabling for plenary
- Tabling for plenary
- Tabling for plenary
- Tabling for plenary
- Plenary vote
- Plenary vote results
Scheduled activities (not confirmation of completion)
- Plenary vote
Procedure file (OEIL) · European Parliament data
Retrieved:
Sources
Data: EP Open Data API
Amendment history (6)
Wording as published by the EP, in English.
- Amendment 6Rejected
Paragraph 25
Tabled by Kristoffer Storm, Guillaume Peltier, Lara Magoni +3 · ECR
… of preventing youth radicalisation by addressing social exclusion and a lack of
Removed: opportunities;Added: opportunities, and by countering online radicalisation and recruitment by extremist actors, such as Hizb ut-Tahrir and the Muslim Brotherhood, that exploit socio-economic vulnerabilities to undermine democratic values; calls for targeted support, such as accessible counselling services, strengthened community-based youthRemoved: workAdded: work, and targeted inclusive measures for marginalised and under-represented young people; - Amendment 7Rejected
Paragraph 35 a (new)
Tabled by Anthony Smith · The Left
Added: 35a. Urges that the proposed directive of the European Parliament and of the Council on improving and enforcing working conditions of trainees and combating regular employment relationships disguised as traineeships, be as ambitious as possible; calls for the scope of this directive to be broad enough to ensure that the rights of trainees, particularly those relating to remuneration and the possibility of terminating the traineeship without prejudice in the event of a breach of fundamental rights, can be fully defended by this directive; hopes that the negotiations will be concluded as quickly as possible.
- Amendment 10Rejected
Paragraph 36 a (new)
Tabled by Anthony Smith · The Left
Added: 36a. Calls on the Member States to introduce a ‘guarantee of independence’ for young people aged between 18 and 25, including students, trainees, apprentices and young people seeking employment, in order to combat poverty and social exclusion and to facilitate their transition to independent living, by ensuring they have access to adequate financial support throughout the year, affordable housing, education and training, healthcare and appropriate social support services.
- Amendment 12Rejected
Paragraph 36 c (new)
Tabled by Anthony Smith · The Left
Added: 36c. Calls on Member States to launch campaigns to tackle period poverty, particularly among young people, by distributing suitable, high-quality sanitary products free of charge.
- Amendment 13Rejected
Paragraph 40 a (new)
Tabled by Anthony Smith, Leila Chaibi · The Left
Added: 40a. Considers that imposing a ‘digital age requirement’ for access to social media will not protect young people from the many risks they face online; believes, on the contrary, that – as the Australian example shows – this measure will drive them towards less regulated digital spaces where they will be even more vulnerable; points out, in addition, that this measure will oblige all social media users, both minors and adults, to have their identity verified online, creating significant risks in terms of security and the protection of personal data;
- Amendment 16Rejected
Paragraph 49 a (new)
Tabled by Guillaume Peltier, Lara Magoni, Ivaylo Valchev +2 · ECR
Added: 49a. Expresses concern about the infiltration strategies carried out by certain organisations linked to political Islam within EU institutions; demands that the Commission establish strict and transparent conditionality in the granting of European funding for youth (such as under Erasmus+ and the European Solidarity Corps), in order to ensure that no public subsidies are paid to associations promoting separatism, Islamism or refusing to recognise the cultural heritage and values of European civilisation;
Vote by political group
How the political groups voted
- 73For
- 1Against
- 0Abstention
- 4Did not vote
- 172For
- 2Against
- 2Abstention
- 8Did not vote
- 125For
- 1Against
- 0Abstention
- 9Did not vote
- 38For
- 0Against
- 1Abstention
- 5Did not vote
- 51For
- 0Against
- 0Abstention
- 2Did not vote
- 5For
- 16Against
- 53Abstention
- 10Did not vote
- 10For
- 10Against
- 7Abstention
- 1Did not vote
- 3For
- 69Against
- 3Abstention
- 9Did not vote
- 0For
- 25Against
- 0Abstention
- 2Did not vote
Members
Showing 10 of 717
| Name | Country | Group | Vote Position |
|---|---|---|---|
For | |||
For | |||
For | |||
For | |||
For | |||
For | |||
For | |||
For | |||
For | |||
For |