EN

Vote in the European Parliament

Plants obtained by certain new genomic techniques and their food and feed, and amending Regulation (EU) 2017/625

Jessica Polfjärd – After Recital 25 – Am 20= 28=
Date: 17.06.2026·Reference: A10-0175/2026
Rapporteur: Jessica Polfjärd
food safetyanimal feedingstuffsinnovationmarket approvalhealth controlconsumer informationgenetically modified organism

Overall Result

Rejected
  • 258 For
  • 370 Against
  • 25 Abstention
  • 66 Did not vote
Amendment— You are viewing a sub-vote (amendment) of the main vote.Amendment 20 · Tabled by The Left Verts/ALEView amendment at the EP ↗
Amendment wording

Tabled by Anja Hazekamp, Emma Fourreau, João Oliveira, Lynn Boylan, Kathleen Funchion, Konstantinos Arvanitis, Per Clausen, Sebastian Everding

Added: (25a) Traceability requirements for food and feed produced from NGTs should be established to facilitate the accurate labelling of such products, in accordance with the requirements of Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 22 September 2003 on genetically modified food and feed, so as to ensure that accurate information is available to operators and consumers to enable them to exercise their freedom of choice in an effective manner, as well as to enable control and verification of labelling claims. Requirements for food and feed produced from NGTs should be similar in order to avoid discontinuity of information in cases of change in end use.

Wording as published by the EP, in English. PE783.371

← Back to Main Vote
Status and procedure

Outcome as recorded by the European Parliament.

Vote held on
Latest recorded step
Official Journal · (140 days ago)
Next scheduled step
No further step is scheduled in the source.
Publication in the Official Journal recorded

Procedure timeline

2023/0226(COD) · COD

Recorded procedure activities. These do not establish whether a law has entered into force.

  1. Recorded: Referral6 days until the next step
  2. Recorded: Committee stage96 days until the next step
  3. Recorded: Plenary9 days until the next step
  4. Recorded: Negotiations77 days until the next step
  5. Recorded: Plenary377 days until the next step
  6. Recorded: Negotiations267 days until the next step
  7. Recorded: Committee stage92 days until the next step
  8. Recorded: Referral22 days until the next step
  9. Recorded: Committee stage24 days until the next step
  10. Recorded: Plenary2 days until the next step
  11. Recorded: SignatureNext step on the same day
  12. Recorded: Other activity9 days until the next step
  13. Latest recorded: Official Journal
Recorded activities (32)
  1. Referral to committee
  2. Committee report tabled
  3. Committee amendments tabled
  4. Committee amendments tabled
  5. Committee amendments tabled
  6. Committee amendments tabled
  7. Committee opinion adopted
  8. Committee report adopted
  9. Tabling for plenary
  10. Plenary debate
  11. Text amended in plenary
  12. Referred back to committee for interinstitutional negotiations
  13. Plenary vote
  14. Plenary vote results
  15. Parliament’s first-reading position
  16. Plenary vote
  17. Plenary vote results
  18. Interinstitutional negotiations
  19. Interinstitutional negotiations
  20. Interinstitutional negotiations
  21. Interinstitutional negotiations
  22. Provisional agreement approved in committee
  23. Referral to committee
  24. Committee amendments tabled
  25. Committee report tabled
  26. Committee report adopted
  27. Tabling for plenary
  28. Other recorded activity
  29. Signature
  30. Plenary vote
  31. Plenary vote results
  32. Publication in the Official Journal
Scheduled activities (not confirmation of completion)
  1. Plenary debate
  2. Plenary vote
  3. Plenary vote
  4. Plenary vote

Procedure file (OEIL) · European Parliament data
Retrieved:

Sources

Roll-call minutesParliament documentProcedure file (OEIL)

Data: EP Open Data API

What is this about?

  • Adoption of regulation on genomic plants following agreement.
  • Implementation of new genomic techniques from 2026 .
  • Criticism of subsidiarity principle violation by member states.
Source: AI Summary with Mistral

Vote by political group

How the political groups voted

Renew Europe (Renew)
For9
  • 9For
  • 60Against
  • 0Abstention
  • 9Did not vote
View details
Progressive Alliance of Socialists and Democrats (S&D)
For79
  • 79For
  • 40Against
  • 3Abstention
  • 13Did not vote
View details
The Left in the European Parliament (GUE/NGL)
For41
  • 41For
  • 2Against
  • 0Abstention
  • 2Did not vote
View details
Greens/European Free Alliance (Greens/EFA)
For42
  • 42For
  • 4Against
  • 0Abstention
  • 7Did not vote
View details
Non-attached Members (NI)
For24
  • 24For
  • 2Against
  • 2Abstention
  • 1Did not vote
View details
European Conservatives and Reformists (ECR)
For22
  • 22For
  • 55Against
  • 0Abstention
  • 5Did not vote
View details
Patriots for Europe (PfE)
For16
  • 16For
  • 61Against
  • 0Abstention
  • 8Did not vote
View details
Europe of Sovereign Nations (ESN)
For17
  • 17For
  • 4Against
  • 5Abstention
  • 1Did not vote
View details
European People's Party (EPP)
For8
  • 8For
  • 142Against
  • 15Abstention
  • 20Did not vote
View details

Members

Showing 10 of 719

Vote Position
NameCountryGroupVote Position
Mihai TudoseMihai Tudose
RomaniaS&D
For
Giuseppe AntociGiuseppe Antoci
ItalyGUE/NGL
For
Terry ReintkeTerry Reintke
GermanyGreens/EFA
For
Maria ZachariaMaria Zacharia
GreeceNI
For
Tobiasz BocheńskiTobiasz Bocheński
PolandECR
For
Bruno GonçalvesBruno Gonçalves
PortugalS&D
For
Alice KuhnkeAlice Kuhnke
SwedenGreens/EFA
For
Claire FitaClaire Fita
FranceS&D
For
Bogdan RzońcaBogdan Rzońca
PolandECR
For
Nicolae ȘtefănuțăNicolae Ștefănuță
RomaniaGreens/EFA
For
Show more
← Go back
Follow us on Instagram@checksomevotes@checksomevotes_en