Vote in the European Parliament
Recommendation to the Council, the Commission and the Vice-President of the Commission / High Representative of the Union on Foreign Affairs and Security Policy on promoting transnational governance on water in the interests of conflict prevention and peace
Overall Result
Adopted- 431 For
- 111 Against
- 103 Abstention
- 74 Did not vote
How we count
- Yes, No and Abstention come from the European Parliament's roll-call voting protocol.
- “Did not vote” is derived: MEPs with a mandate on the voting day for whom no vote was recorded. Abstentions do not count towards this.
- Subsequent vote corrections are shown but do not change the official result.
- Each vote (overall vote, amendment, partial vote) counts separately. Therefore totals may differ from pages that count differently.
Status and procedure
Outcome as recorded by the European Parliament.
- Vote held on
- Latest recorded step
- Plenary · (161 days ago)
- Next scheduled step
- No further step is scheduled in the source.
Procedure timeline
2025/2216(INI) · INI
Recorded procedure activities. These do not establish whether a law has entered into force.
- Recorded: Referral
- Recorded: Committee stage
- Latest recorded: Plenary
Recorded activities (10)
- Referral to committee
- Committee report tabled
- Committee amendments tabled
- Committee opinion adopted
- Committee report adopted
- Tabling for plenary
- Tabling for plenary
- Tabling for plenary
- Plenary vote
- Plenary vote results
Scheduled activities (not confirmation of completion)
- Plenary vote
Procedure file (OEIL) · European Parliament data
Retrieved:
Sources
Data: EP Open Data API
What is this about?
- Promotion of transnational water governance for conflict prevention.
- 2.2 billion people lack safe drinking water access.
- EU funding for cross-border water projects from 2027 .
Amendment history (6)
Wording as published by the EP, in English.
- Amendment 1Rejected
Recital J a (new)
Tabled by Pernando Barrena Arza · The Left
Added: Ja. whereas the UN Commission on Human Rights, in its Resolution 12 (XXXVII) of 6 March 1981, deplored the continuance of the occupation of Western Sahara by Morocco and affirmed the right of the Sahrawi people to self-determination; whereas the exploitation of natural resources, including water resources, in occupied territories without the consent of the people concerned undermines the right to self-determination and may entrench situations of occupation and instability; whereas the Court of Justice of the European Union, in Joined Cases C-778/21 P and C-798/21 P1a and in Joined Cases C-779/21 P and C-799/21 P1b, held that the application of EU-Morocco economic agreements to Western Sahara and its adjacent waters requires the consent of the people of Western Sahara, in light of the right to self-determination and the principle of the relative effect of treaties; _______________________ 1a Judgment of the Court of Justice of 4 October 2024, European Commission and Council of the European Union v Front populaire pour la libération de la Saguia el-Hamra et du Rio de oro (Front Polisario), C-778/21 P and C-798/21 P, ECLI:EU:C:2024:833. 1b Judgment of the Court of Justice of 4 October 2024, European Commission and Council of the European Union v Front populaire pour la libération de la Saguia el-Hamra et du Rio de oro (Front Polisario), C-779/21 P and C-799/21 P, ECLI:EU:C:2024:835.
- Amendment 2Rejected
Recital S
Tabled by Pernando Barrena Arza, Rima Hassan · The Left
S. Added: whereas, although the Oslo Accords recognised the Joint Water Committee as a water governance mechanism, World Bank assessments have shown that it has in practice impeded Palestinian water development through the entrenchment of asymmetrical control and the veto power exercised by Israel; whereas the EU
Removed: is supportive of the joint Israeli-Palestinian water governance mechanisms, including the relaunch of existing frameworks such as the Joint Water Committee, with a view to promoting equitable water distribution, improved transparency and effective infrastructure development;Added: should therefore refrain from promoting structurally unbalanced mechanisms that cannot ensure equitable Palestinian access to water and sanitation; whereas unequal access to shared water resources remains a structural driver of … - Amendment 3Rejected
Recital T
Tabled by Pernando Barrena Arza, Rima Hassan · The Left
T. whereas as a result of the
Removed: conflict between Israel and Hamas,Added: genocide perpetrated by Israel against Palestinians in Gaza, there has been extensive destruction of water, sanitation and hygiene infrastructure in … - Amendment 4Rejected
Paragraph 1 – point k a (new)
Tabled by Pernando Barrena Arza, Rima Hassan · The Left
Added: (ka) recognise that the deliberate deprivation of water and the systematic destruction of water and sanitation infrastructure in Gaza constitute grave breaches of international humanitarian law and serious violations of human rights; recall that, pursuant to Article 2 of the EU-Israel Association Agreement1a, respect for human rights and democratic principles constitutes an essential element of the agreement; call for the immediate suspension of the EU-Israel Association agreement in light of Israel’s serious and persistent violations of international law; ________________________ 1a Euro-Mediterranean Agreement establishing an association between the European Communities and their Member States, of the one part, and the State of Israel, of the other part (OJ L 147, 21.6.2000, p. 3, ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/agree_internation/2000/384/oj).
- Amendment 5Rejected
Recital R
Tabled by Petras Auštrevičius · Renew
… in investigating the perpetrators so that they can be prosecuted for war
Removed: crimes and crimes against humanity;Added: crimes, crimes against humanity and ecocide; - Amendment 7Rejected
Paragraph 1 – point u
Tabled by Petras Auštrevičius · Renew
… and compensation for the deliberate targeting and destruction of water supplies and
Removed: infrastructure;Added: infrastructure as well as for acts of ecocide;
Vote by political group
How the political groups voted
- 63For
- 1Against
- 0Abstention
- 14Did not vote
- 119For
- 0Against
- 0Abstention
- 16Did not vote
- 164For
- 1Against
- 1Abstention
- 19Did not vote
- 29For
- 1Against
- 14Abstention
- 1Did not vote
- 45For
- 0Against
- 0Abstention
- 8Did not vote
- 9For
- 9Against
- 10Abstention
- 1Did not vote
- 2For
- 3Against
- 72Abstention
- 5Did not vote
- 0For
- 75Against
- 2Abstention
- 8Did not vote
- 0For
- 21Against
- 4Abstention
- 2Did not vote
Members
Showing 10 of 719
| Name | Country | Group | Vote Position |
|---|---|---|---|
For | |||
For | |||
For | |||
For | |||
For | |||
For | |||
For | |||
For | |||
For | |||
For |