Vote in the European Parliament
Enhanced Partnership and Cooperation Agreement between the European Union, of the one part, and the Republic of Uzbekistan, of the other part
Overall Result
Adopted- 423 For
- 16 Against
- 208 Abstention
- 70 Did not vote
How we count
- Yes, No and Abstention come from the European Parliament's roll-call voting protocol.
- “Did not vote” is derived: MEPs with a mandate on the voting day for whom no vote was recorded. Abstentions do not count towards this.
- Subsequent vote corrections are shown but do not change the official result.
- Each vote (overall vote, amendment, partial vote) counts separately. Therefore totals may differ from pages that count differently.
Status and procedure
Outcome as recorded by the European Parliament.
- Vote held on
- Latest recorded step
- Other activity · (177 days ago)
- Next scheduled step
- No further step is scheduled in the source.
Procedure timeline
2024/0260(NLE) · NLE
Recorded procedure activities. These do not establish whether a law has entered into force.
- Recorded: Referral
- Recorded: Committee stage
- Recorded: Plenary
- Latest recorded: Other activity
Recorded activities (8)
- Referral to committee
- Committee report tabled
- Committee report adopted
- Tabling for plenary
- Plenary debate
- Other recorded activity
- Plenary vote
- Plenary vote results
Scheduled activities (not confirmation of completion)
- Plenary debate
- Plenary vote
Procedure file (OEIL) · European Parliament data
Retrieved:
Sources
Data: EP Open Data API
What is this about?
- Approval of the EPCA agreement between EU and Uzbekistan.
- Demand for human rights reforms and democratic opening.
- Emphasis on strategic partnership in Central Asia.
Amendment history (8)
Wording as published by the EP, in English.
- Amendment 1Adopted
Paragraph 37 a (new)
Tabled by Yannis Maniatis, Nacho Sánchez Amor, Claudiu Manda · S&D
Added: 37a. Is concerned about the growing evidence that Uzbekistan has weaponised international and regional legal cooperation mechanisms for transnational repression against activists, journalists, human rights defenders and trial monitors; notes that this includes misuse of INTERPOL notices and diffusions, mutual legal assistance requests, and cooperation on anti-money laundering and countering the financing of terrorism to pursue politically motivated extradition, detention or forcible return of individuals; calls on Uzbekistan to fully respect the principle of non-refoulement;
- Amendment 4Rejected
Recital I a (new)
Tabled by Sarah Knafo · ESN
Added: Ia. whereas the European Union should not use its taxpayers’ money to fund programmes in Uzbekistan based on ideological criteria;
- Amendment 5Rejected
Recital N
Tabled by Stanislav Stoyanov, Alexander Sell, Tomasz Froelich · ESN
… with the EU and 7.2 % of exports went to the EU; Added: whereas the EU Member States need to tap into this economic potential in order to increase the opportunities for European companies to access Uzbekistan’s market of 38.2 million consumers;
- Amendment 8Rejected
Paragraph 3
Tabled by Alexander Sell, Tomasz Froelich · ESN
3. Stresses that Parliament’s consent to the EPCA
Removed: constitutes a strategic investment in the EU-Uzbekistan partnership and should be understood as a tool to foster long-term engagement, stability and cooperation, contributing to the EU’s broader strategy in Central Asia and to balanced international alignment;Added: must serve the concrete economic and security interests of the European Union and its Member States; emphasises that the EPCA should function as a framework for mutually advantageous cooperation; insists that any engagement must deliver measurable benefits to the EU Member States; - Amendment 9Rejected
Paragraph 6 a (new)
Tabled by Tomasz Froelich, Alexander Sell · ESN
Added: 6a. Is worried that the EU risks being sidelined in a region where big powers compete for influence and resources; considers that energy and resource supply should be a key part of a strengthened partnership as this would bolster the EU’s energy security and strengthen its strategic position; calls, therefore, for the EU to set aside its political conditionality approach and follow a strategy that aims to facilitate investment in critical raw materials and renewable energy;
- Amendment 14Rejected
Paragraph 47 a (new)
Tabled by Stanislav Stoyanov, Tomasz Froelich · ESN
Added: 47a. Invites the Government of Uzbekistan to take advantage of the skills and competences acquired by the returning migrants while abroad and create job opportunities for them to avoid further brain drain and boost its own labour market;
- Amendment 15Rejected
Paragraph 49
Tabled by Alexander Sell, Tomasz Froelich · ESN
… EU-Uzbekistan memorandum of understanding launching a strategic partnership on critical raw materials;
Removed: welcomes the EU-Central Asia declaration of intent on critical raw materials, endorsed at the first EU-Central Asia summit, which reflects the mutual interest in boosting cooperation on energy and the green transition;Added: underlines that Uzbekistan ranks among the world’s leading producers of uranium, gold, copper and rare earth elements critical to the EU’s energy security and industrial sovereignty; calls for this partnership to be operationalised through binding supply agreements, joint venture frameworks and priority access for EU companies; welcomes the introduction of an additional EUR 12 billion investment package during … - Amendment 16Rejected
Paragraph 54
Tabled by Alexander Sell, Tomasz Froelich · ESN
54.
Removed: SupportsAdded: Welcomes the strengthening of people-to-people contacts, student, academic, scientific, cultural and other professional exchanges,Removed: and mobility,notably in the fields of education, business and tourism; notes that the EPCA includes the possibility of negotiating a readmissionRemoved: agreement and an agreement on visa facilitation; invites both sides to take the steps necessary to meet the conditions for the launch of the negotiations;Added: agreement; rejects any visa facilitation arrangement that could lead to increased illegal migration or place additional burden on the EU’s asylum system;
Vote by political group
How the political groups voted
- 72For
- 0Against
- 0Abstention
- 5Did not vote
- 158For
- 1Against
- 0Abstention
- 24Did not vote
- 47For
- 0Against
- 0Abstention
- 6Did not vote
- 119For
- 0Against
- 0Abstention
- 17Did not vote
- 8For
- 2Against
- 66Abstention
- 5Did not vote
- 11For
- 9Against
- 6Abstention
- 4Did not vote
- 7For
- 4Against
- 68Abstention
- 6Did not vote
- 1For
- 0Against
- 42Abstention
- 2Did not vote
- 0For
- 0Against
- 26Abstention
- 1Did not vote
Members
Showing 10 of 717
| Name | Country | Group | Vote Position |
|---|---|---|---|
For | |||
For | |||
For | |||
For | |||
For | |||
For | |||
For | |||
For | |||
For | |||
For |