EN
Español
FrançaisVote in the European Parliament
Banking Union – annual report 2025
Overall Result
Adopted- 376 For
- 187 Against
- 17 Abstention
- 139 Did not vote
How we count
- Yes, No and Abstention come from the European Parliament's roll-call voting protocol.
- “Did not vote” is derived: MEPs with a mandate on the voting day for whom no vote was recorded. Abstentions do not count towards this.
- Subsequent vote corrections are shown but do not change the official result.
- Each vote (overall vote, amendment, partial vote) counts separately. Therefore totals may differ from pages that count differently.
Status and procedure
Outcome as recorded by the European Parliament.
- Vote held on
- Latest recorded step
- Plenary · (228 days ago)
- Next scheduled step
- No further step is scheduled in the source.
Procedure timeline
2025/2136(INI) · INI
Recorded procedure activities. These do not establish whether a law has entered into force.
- Recorded: Referral
- Recorded: Committee stage
- Latest recorded: Plenary
Recorded activities (7)
- Referral to committee
- Committee report tabled
- Committee amendments tabled
- Committee report adopted
- Tabling for plenary
- Plenary vote
- Plenary vote results
Scheduled activities (not confirmation of completion)
- Plenary vote
Procedure file (OEIL) · European Parliament data
Retrieved:
Sources
Data: EP Open Data API
What is this about?
- Banking Union aims to protect taxpayers from bank bailouts.
- Completion of Banking Union with EDIS as third pillar demanded.
- ECB and SRM enhance financial stability in the euro area.
Amendment history (1)
Wording as published by the EP, in English.
- Amendment 1Rejected
Paragraph 20
Tabled by Jussi Saramo · The Left
20. Acknowledges the specific risks posed by
Removed: crypto-assets, while also acknowledging the opportunities they offer, such as euro-denominated stablecoins;Added: crypto-assets; underlines that crypto-assets function primarily as speculative instruments rather than efficient means of payment; calls for consistentRemoved: innovation-friendlysupervision to ensure that innovation serves the public; calls for the EU … and protect consumers; underlines the importance of global standards in this field; Added: underlines the findings of an ECB working paper1a studying the effects of stablecoin adoption; emphasises, in this regard, the potential effects of increased stablecoin usage in the euro area, such as deposit substitution, which erodes banks’ stable funding base and constrains credit supply, and the declining effectiveness of monetary policy; 1a European Central Bank, Working Paper Series, No 3199: Stablecoins and monetary policy transmission, 2026.
Vote by political group
How the political groups voted
Renew Europe (Renew)- 62For
- 3Against
- 0Abstention
- 12Did not vote
European People's Party (EPP)- 135For
- 0Against
- 1Abstention
- 49Did not vote
Progressive Alliance of Socialists and Democrats (S&D)- 110For
- 0Against
- 0Abstention
- 25Did not vote
The Left in the European Parliament (GUE/NGL)- 20For
- 6Against
- 9Abstention
- 11Did not vote
Greens/European Free Alliance (Greens/EFA)- 44For
- 0Against
- 0Abstention
- 9Did not vote
Non-attached Members (NI)- 5For
- 17Against
- 5Abstention
- 3Did not vote
European Conservatives and Reformists (ECR)- 0For
- 68Against
- 2Abstention
- 11Did not vote
Patriots for Europe (PfE)- 0For
- 70Against
- 0Abstention
- 15Did not vote
Europe of Sovereign Nations (ESN)- 0For
- 23Against
- 0Abstention
- 4Did not vote
Members
Showing 10 of 719
| Name | Country | Group | Vote Position |
|---|---|---|---|
 Finland | EPP | For | |
 Sweden | EPP | For | |
 Austria | S&D | For | |
 Italy | GUE/NGL | For | |
 Luxembourg | Renew | For | |
| Italy | Greens/EFA | For | |
 Germany | Greens/EFA | For | |
 Denmark | Greens/EFA | For | |
 Czechia | EPP | For | |
| Germany | GUE/NGL | For |
