Vote in the European Parliament
Amending Decision (EU) 2015/1814 as regards the market stability reserve for the buildings, road transport and additional sector
Overall Result
Adopted- 433 For
- 120 Against
- 91 Abstention
- 75 Did not vote
How we count
- Yes, No and Abstention come from the European Parliament's roll-call voting protocol.
- “Did not vote” is derived: MEPs with a mandate on the voting day for whom no vote was recorded. Abstentions do not count towards this.
- Subsequent vote corrections are shown but do not change the official result.
- Each vote (overall vote, amendment, partial vote) counts separately. Therefore totals may differ from pages that count differently.
Status and procedure
Outcome as recorded by the European Parliament.
- Vote held on
- Latest recorded step
- Official Journal · (16 days ago)
- Next scheduled step
- No further step is scheduled in the source.
- Publication in the Official Journal recorded
Procedure timeline
2025/0380(COD) · COD
Recorded procedure activities. These do not establish whether a law has entered into force.
- Recorded: Referral
- Recorded: Committee stage
- Recorded: Plenary
- Recorded: Negotiations
- Recorded: Committee stage
- Recorded: Plenary
- Recorded: Signature
- Latest recorded: Official Journal
Recorded activities (22)
- Referral to committee
- Committee report tabled
- Committee amendments tabled
- Committee report adopted
- Tabling for plenary
- Text amended in plenary
- Referred back to committee for interinstitutional negotiations
- Plenary vote
- Plenary vote results
- Interinstitutional negotiations
- Provisional agreement approved in committee
- Tabling for plenary
- Tabling for plenary
- Tabling for plenary
- Tabling for plenary
- Tabling for plenary
- Tabling for plenary
- Parliament’s first-reading position
- Plenary vote
- Plenary vote results
- Signature
- Publication in the Official Journal
Scheduled activities (not confirmation of completion)
- Plenary vote
- Plenary vote
Procedure file (OEIL) · European Parliament data
Retrieved:
Sources
Data: EP Open Data API
What is this about?
- Allowances to be released one month earlier in cases of sudden price spikes
- Unallocated allowances to stay in the market stability reserve after 2031
- €45 cap should be prolonged beyond 2029 and indexed to 2026 prices
Amendment history (7)
Wording as published by the EP, in English.
Recital 6 a (new)
Tabled by Jana Nagyová, Antonín Staněk, Mathilde Androuët +5 · PfE
Added: (6 a) Chapter IVa of Directive 2003/87/EC introduced a separate emissions trading system (ETS2) for fuels used in buildings, road transport and additional sectors. This system risks increasing the cost of living across the Union, especially for vulnerable groups. At a time when many Union citizens are already facing persistent inflation, high energy prices and economic uncertainty, the introduction of ETS2 risks further exacerbating social inequalities. Therefore, Chapter IVa of Directive 2003/87/EC should be deleted. Consequently, Article 1a of Decision (EU) 2015/1814 should also be deleted, as it would be no longer necessary in the absence of ETS2.
Article 1 a (new)
Tabled by Jana Nagyová, Antonín Staněk, Mathilde Androuët +5 · PfE
Added: Article1a Repeal of the Emissions Trading System for Buildings, Road Transport and additional Sectors Chapter IVa of Directive (EU) 2023/959 is deleted. Article 1a of Decision (EU) 2015/1814 is deleted.
Recital 6 a (new)
Tabled by Anna Zalewska · ECR
Added: (6 a) As part of the upcoming review of Directive (EU) 2003/87/EC, the Commission should thoroughly assess the introduction of Chapter IVa establishing emissions trading system for buildings, road transport and additional sectors. Particular attention should be paid to the social and financial consequences of the extension of the EU ETS for households, especially low-income and vulnerable households, as well as for transport users. The evaluation should examine, inter alia, the possibility of deleting or significantly postponing the application of Chapter IVa; the effectiveness of the extension of the EU ETS to new sectors and assessment of the proportionality of the measure given its negative impact on households and transport users. Moreover, the evaluation shall assess the general impact of the European climate policies, in particular of the Directive 2003/87 (EU ETS Directive) and Directive 2024/1275 (Emissions performance of buildings Directive) on European households.
Recital 6 b (new)
Tabled by Anna Zalewska · ECR
Added: (6 b) European households and industries are already subject to significant regulatory and financial obligations arising from the Union’s climate legislation. Measures adopted under Directive 2003/87/EC establishing the EU Emissions Trading System result in increased energy and production costs, while requirements stemming from Directive (EU) 2024/1275 on the energy performance of buildings result in substantial renovation costs for households. In this context, additional regulatory burdens, such as the introduction of the extension of the EU ETS to buildings and road transport could further increase the cost of energy, heating and transport, in particular for low-income and vulnerable households.
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 4
Tabled by Anna Zalewska · ECR
… released from the reserve in accordance with Article 30h(2) of Directive 2003/87/EC, Added: at least 20 million more allowances shall be added to the amount to be released from the
Removed: reserve.’.Added: reserve in order to effectively prevent excessive price increase.’.Article 1 a (new)
Tabled by Anna Zalewska · ECR
Added: Article1a Deletion of the entry into force of the emissions trading system for buildings, road transport and additional sectors Chapter IVa of Directive 2003/87 is deleted.
Article 1 b (new)
Tabled by Anna Zalewska · ECR
Added: Article 1b Postponement of the operation of emissions trading for buildings, road transport and additional sectors The operation of emissions trading for buildings, road transport and additional sectors set out in Chapter IVa of Directive 2003/87 is postponed until 2030.
Vote by political group
How the political groups voted
- 60For
- 0Against
- 6Abstention
- 11Did not vote
- 140For
- 1Against
- 18Abstention
- 26Did not vote
- 120For
- 0Against
- 3Abstention
- 12Did not vote
- 29For
- 1Against
- 13Abstention
- 3Did not vote
- 22For
- 3Against
- 2Abstention
- 0Did not vote
- 44For
- 1Against
- 0Abstention
- 8Did not vote
- 7For
- 11Against
- 8Abstention
- 4Did not vote
- 8For
- 55Against
- 12Abstention
- 10Did not vote
- 3For
- 48Against
- 29Abstention
- 1Did not vote
Members
Showing 10 of 719
| Name | Country | Group | Vote Position |
|---|---|---|---|
For | |||
For | |||
For | |||
For | |||
For | |||
For | |||
For | |||
For | |||
For | |||
For |