Vote in the European Parliament

Discharge 2024: General budget of the EU - European Council and Council

Pasquale Tridico – Motion for a resolution (as a whole)
Date: 29.04.2026·Reference: A10-0051/2026
Rapporteur: Pasquale Tridico

Overall Result

Adopted
  • 432 For
  • 160 Against
  • 65 Abstention
  • 62 Did not vote
Status and procedure

Outcome as recorded by the European Parliament.

Vote held on
Latest recorded step
Other activity · (23 days ago)
Next scheduled step
No further step is scheduled in the source.
Publication in the Official Journal recorded

Procedure timeline

2025/2147(DEC) · DEC

Recorded procedure activities. These do not establish whether a law has entered into force.

  1. Recorded: Referral99 days until the next step
  2. Recorded: Committee stage100 days until the next step
  3. Recorded: Plenary97 days until the next step
  4. Recorded: Committee stage70 days until the next step
  5. Recorded: Official Journal21 days until the next step
  6. Recorded: Committee stage5 days until the next step
  7. Recorded: Plenary15 days until the next step
  8. Latest recorded: Other activity23 days since this step began
Recorded activities (18)
  1. Referral to committee
  2. Committee report tabled
  3. Committee amendments tabled
  4. Committee report adopted
  5. Tabling for plenary
  6. Plenary debate
  7. Plenary vote
  8. Plenary vote results
  9. Committee report tabled
  10. Publication in the Official Journal
  11. Committee amendments tabled
  12. Committee report adopted
  13. Tabling for plenary
  14. Tabling for plenary
  15. Tabling for plenary
  16. Other recorded activity
  17. Plenary vote
  18. Plenary vote results
Scheduled activities (not confirmation of completion)
  1. Plenary debate
  2. Plenary vote
  3. Plenary vote

Procedure file (OEIL) · European Parliament data
Retrieved:

Sources

Data: EP Open Data API

What is this about?

  • Discharge procedure for 2024 budget postponed.
  • Criticism of Council's lack of transparency and cooperation .
  • Demand for reforms on accountability and democratic oversight .
Source: AI Summary with Mistral

Amendment history (2)

Wording as published by the EP, in English.

  1. Amendment 2 · Motion for a resolutionRejected

    Paragraph 30

    Tabled by Ondřej Knotek · PfE

    30. Stresses that Removed: while unanimity voting remains a core principle of the Removed: Treaties, its application can, in certain circumstances and in critical policy areas, affect the timelines and effectiveness of the Union, including by paralysing the Union’s decision-making process and therefore making it prone to blackmail by Member States, especially those who fail to respect the rule of law; reiterates in this sense its regret regarding the Hungarian government’s obstructive stance within the European Council; notes that ongoing political deadlocks continue to undermine trust and the European Council’s effectiveness; calls for targeted treaty reforms or, alternatively, practical improvements, within the existing Treaty framework, to strengthen transparency, democratic decision making, accountability and the efficiency of the European Council’s work; reiterates in this context its call for the Council of Ministers to move from unanimity to qualified majority voting for decisions in areas of strategic interest to the Union; notes further that the unanimity requirement has been a significant impediment to effectively responding to Russia’s action, in particular on the imposition of sanctions which are subject to renewal every three months, thereby risking the weakening of the Union’s capacity to act decisively and transparently and undermining citizens’ trust and the Union’s credibility as a geopolitical actor; calls on the Council to shift to qualified majority voting in critical areas, notably sanction regimes, in order for the Union to be able to act effectively in the face of global challenges; Added: Treaties and acts as a safeguard to national sovereignty in sensitive policy areas; highlights that its use constitutes a legitimate expression of democratic accountability by Member States’ governments towards their national parliaments and citizens; underlines that any debate on decision-making efficiency must fully respect the Treaties and cannot undermine the principle of conferral between the Union and its Member States;

  2. Amendment 6 · Motion for a resolutionRejected

    Paragraph 30

    Tabled by Dick Erixon, Charlie Weimers, Cristian Terheş +1 · ECR

    30. Stresses that Removed: while unanimity voting remains Added: unanimity voting is a core principle of the Removed: Treaties, its application can, in certain circumstances and in critical policy areas, affect the timelines and effectiveness of the Union, including by paralysing the Union’s decision-making process and therefore making it prone to blackmail by Member States, especially those who fail to respect the rule of law; reiterates in this sense its regret regarding the Hungarian government’s obstructive stance within the European Council; notes that ongoing political deadlocks continue to undermine trust and the European Council’s effectiveness; calls for targeted treaty reforms or, alternatively, practical improvements, within the existing Treaty framework, to strengthen transparency, democratic decision making, accountability and the efficiency of the European Council’s work; reiterates in this context its call for the Council of Ministers to move from unanimity to qualified majority voting for decisions in areas of strategic interest to the Union; notes further that the unanimity requirement has been a significant impediment to effectively responding to Russia’s action, in particular on the imposition of sanctions which are subject to renewal every three months, thereby risking the weakening of the Union’s capacity to act decisively and transparently and undermining citizens’ trust and the Union’s credibility as a geopolitical actor; calls on the Council to shift to qualified majority voting in critical areas, notably sanction regimes, in order for the Union to be able to act effectively in the face of global challenges; Added: Treaties that protects the rights of all Member States; rejects calls for treaty reforms that limit or decrease the application of unanimity voting;

Vote by political group

How the political groups voted

Members

Showing 10 of 719

Vote Position
NameCountryGroupVote Position
AustriaS&D
For
ItalyS&D
For
CzechiaEPP
For
FranceS&D
For
BelgiumRenew
For
GermanyRenew
For
HungaryS&D
For
GermanyGreens/EFA
For
SpainS&D
For
FranceS&D
For
Show more
Follow us on Instagram@checksomevotes@checksomevotes_en