Vote in the European Parliament
Discharge 2024: General budget of the EU - European Council and Council
Overall Result
Adopted- 432 For
- 160 Against
- 65 Abstention
- 62 Did not vote
How we count
- Yes, No and Abstention come from the European Parliament's roll-call voting protocol.
- “Did not vote” is derived: MEPs with a mandate on the voting day for whom no vote was recorded. Abstentions do not count towards this.
- Subsequent vote corrections are shown but do not change the official result.
- Each vote (overall vote, amendment, partial vote) counts separately. Therefore totals may differ from pages that count differently.
Status and procedure
Outcome as recorded by the European Parliament.
- Vote held on
- Latest recorded step
- Other activity · (23 days ago)
- Next scheduled step
- No further step is scheduled in the source.
- Publication in the Official Journal recorded
Procedure timeline
2025/2147(DEC) · DEC
Recorded procedure activities. These do not establish whether a law has entered into force.
- Recorded: Referral
- Recorded: Committee stage
- Recorded: Plenary
- Recorded: Committee stage
- Recorded: Official Journal
- Recorded: Committee stage
- Recorded: Plenary
- Latest recorded: Other activity
Recorded activities (18)
- Referral to committee
- Committee report tabled
- Committee amendments tabled
- Committee report adopted
- Tabling for plenary
- Plenary debate
- Plenary vote
- Plenary vote results
- Committee report tabled
- Publication in the Official Journal
- Committee amendments tabled
- Committee report adopted
- Tabling for plenary
- Tabling for plenary
- Tabling for plenary
- Other recorded activity
- Plenary vote
- Plenary vote results
Scheduled activities (not confirmation of completion)
- Plenary debate
- Plenary vote
- Plenary vote
Procedure file (OEIL) · European Parliament data
Retrieved:
Sources
Data: EP Open Data API
What is this about?
- Discharge procedure for 2024 budget postponed.
- Criticism of Council's lack of transparency and cooperation .
- Demand for reforms on accountability and democratic oversight .
Amendment history (2)
Wording as published by the EP, in English.
Paragraph 30
Tabled by Ondřej Knotek · PfE
30. Stresses that
Removed: whileunanimity voting remains a core principle of theRemoved: Treaties, its application can, in certain circumstances and in critical policy areas, affect the timelines and effectiveness of the Union, including by paralysing the Union’s decision-making process and therefore making it prone to blackmail by Member States, especially those who fail to respect the rule of law; reiterates in this sense its regret regarding the Hungarian government’s obstructive stance within the European Council; notes that ongoing political deadlocks continue to undermine trust and the European Council’s effectiveness; calls for targeted treaty reforms or, alternatively, practical improvements, within the existing Treaty framework, to strengthen transparency, democratic decision making, accountability and the efficiency of the European Council’s work; reiterates in this context its call for the Council of Ministers to move from unanimity to qualified majority voting for decisions in areas of strategic interest to the Union; notes further that the unanimity requirement has been a significant impediment to effectively responding to Russia’s action, in particular on the imposition of sanctions which are subject to renewal every three months, thereby risking the weakening of the Union’s capacity to act decisively and transparently and undermining citizens’ trust and the Union’s credibility as a geopolitical actor; calls on the Council to shift to qualified majority voting in critical areas, notably sanction regimes, in order for the Union to be able to act effectively in the face of global challenges;Added: Treaties and acts as a safeguard to national sovereignty in sensitive policy areas; highlights that its use constitutes a legitimate expression of democratic accountability by Member States’ governments towards their national parliaments and citizens; underlines that any debate on decision-making efficiency must fully respect the Treaties and cannot undermine the principle of conferral between the Union and its Member States;Paragraph 30
Tabled by Dick Erixon, Charlie Weimers, Cristian Terheş +1 · ECR
30. Stresses that
Removed: while unanimity voting remainsAdded: unanimity voting is a core principle of theRemoved: Treaties, its application can, in certain circumstances and in critical policy areas, affect the timelines and effectiveness of the Union, including by paralysing the Union’s decision-making process and therefore making it prone to blackmail by Member States, especially those who fail to respect the rule of law; reiterates in this sense its regret regarding the Hungarian government’s obstructive stance within the European Council; notes that ongoing political deadlocks continue to undermine trust and the European Council’s effectiveness; calls for targeted treaty reforms or, alternatively, practical improvements, within the existing Treaty framework, to strengthen transparency, democratic decision making, accountability and the efficiency of the European Council’s work; reiterates in this context its call for the Council of Ministers to move from unanimity to qualified majority voting for decisions in areas of strategic interest to the Union; notes further that the unanimity requirement has been a significant impediment to effectively responding to Russia’s action, in particular on the imposition of sanctions which are subject to renewal every three months, thereby risking the weakening of the Union’s capacity to act decisively and transparently and undermining citizens’ trust and the Union’s credibility as a geopolitical actor; calls on the Council to shift to qualified majority voting in critical areas, notably sanction regimes, in order for the Union to be able to act effectively in the face of global challenges;Added: Treaties that protects the rights of all Member States; rejects calls for treaty reforms that limit or decrease the application of unanimity voting;
Vote by political group
How the political groups voted
- 67For
- 0Against
- 0Abstention
- 10Did not vote
- 122For
- 1Against
- 1Abstention
- 11Did not vote
- 150For
- 1Against
- 13Abstention
- 21Did not vote
- 45For
- 0Against
- 0Abstention
- 8Did not vote
- 41For
- 2Against
- 1Abstention
- 2Did not vote
- 4For
- 19Against
- 4Abstention
- 3Did not vote
- 3For
- 32Against
- 46Abstention
- 0Did not vote
- 0For
- 78Against
- 0Abstention
- 7Did not vote
- 0For
- 27Against
- 0Abstention
- 0Did not vote
Members
Showing 10 of 719
| Name | Country | Group | Vote Position |
|---|---|---|---|
For | |||
For | |||
For | |||
For | |||
For | |||
For | |||
For | |||
For | |||
For | |||
For |