EN
DeutschVote in the European Parliament
European Chemicals Agency and amending Regulations (EC) No 1907/2006, (EU) No 528/2012, (EU) No 649/2012 and (EU) 2019/1021
Christophe Clergeau – Commission proposal and amendments
Date: 29.04.2026Reference: A10-0093/2026operation of the Institutionsenvironmental protectionpublic healthscientific cooperationchemical productchemicals legislationEuropean Chemicals Agency
Overall Result
Adopted- 526 For
- 56 Against
- 69 Abstention
- 68 Did not vote
How we count
- Yes, No and Abstention come from the European Parliament's roll-call voting protocol.
- “Did not vote” is derived: MEPs with a mandate on the voting day for whom no vote was recorded. Abstentions do not count towards this.
- Subsequent vote corrections are shown but do not change the official result.
- Each vote (overall vote, amendment, partial vote) counts separately. Therefore totals may differ from pages that count differently.
Status and procedure
Outcome as recorded by the European Parliament.
- Vote held on
- Latest recorded step
- Plenary · (9 days ago)
- Next scheduled step
- No further step is scheduled in the source.
Procedure timeline
2025/0207(COD) · COD
Recorded procedure activities. These do not establish whether a law has entered into force.
- Recorded: Referral
- Recorded: Committee stage
- Recorded: Plenary
- Recorded: Negotiations
- Recorded: Committee stage
- Latest recorded: Plenary
Recorded activities (14)
- Referral to committee
- Committee report tabled
- Committee amendments tabled
- Committee opinion adopted
- Committee report adopted
- Tabling for plenary
- Text amended in plenary
- Referred back to committee for interinstitutional negotiations
- Plenary vote
- Plenary vote results
- Interinstitutional negotiations
- Provisional agreement approved in committee
- Tabling for plenary
- Tabling for plenary
Scheduled activities (not confirmation of completion)
- Plenary vote
- Plenary vote
Procedure file (OEIL) · European Parliament data
Retrieved:
Sources
Data: EP Open Data API
What is this about?
- Labelling must remain legible for consumers
- Cosmetics with carcinogenic, mutagenic, and reprotoxic substances must be taken off the market faster than the Commission is proposing
- Regulatory simplification of fertilisers must benefit EU producers and farmers
Vote by political group
How the political groups voted
Renew Europe (Renew)For66
- 66For
- 0Against
- 0Abstention
- 11Did not vote
Greens/European Free Alliance (Greens/EFA)For45
- 45For
- 0Against
- 0Abstention
- 8Did not vote
Progressive Alliance of Socialists and Democrats (S&D)For122
- 122For
- 0Against
- 0Abstention
- 13Did not vote
European People's Party (EPP)For163
- 163For
- 0Against
- 2Abstention
- 20Did not vote
Non-attached Members (NI)For13
- 13For
- 9Against
- 5Abstention
- 3Did not vote
European Conservatives and Reformists (ECR)For73
- 73For
- 6Against
- 2Abstention
- 0Did not vote
The Left in the European Parliament (GUE/NGL)For43
- 43For
- 0Against
- 0Abstention
- 3Did not vote
Europe of Sovereign Nations (ESN)For1
- 1For
- 23Against
- 3Abstention
- 0Did not vote
Patriots for Europe (PfE)For0
- 0For
- 18Against
- 57Abstention
- 10Did not vote
Members
Showing 10 of 719
| Name | Country | Group | Vote Position |
|---|---|---|---|
 Spain | Greens/EFA | For | |
| Spain | S&D | For | |
 Lithuania | EPP | For | |
 Sweden | EPP | For | |
 Greece | NI | For | |
 Netherlands | EPP | For | |
 Italy | Renew | For | |
 France | Renew | For | |
 Finland | Greens/EFA | For | |
| Italy | S&D | For |
