EN
EspañolVote in the European Parliament
The role of ocean diplomacy for the competitiveness of EU fisheries and aquaculture
Overall Result
Adopted- 430 For
- 107 Against
- 115 Abstention
- 67 Did not vote
How we count
- Yes, No and Abstention come from the European Parliament's roll-call voting protocol.
- “Did not vote” is derived: MEPs with a mandate on the voting day for whom no vote was recorded. Abstentions do not count towards this.
- Subsequent vote corrections are shown but do not change the official result.
- Each vote (overall vote, amendment, partial vote) counts separately. Therefore totals may differ from pages that count differently.
Status and procedure
Outcome as recorded by the European Parliament.
- Vote held on
- Latest recorded step
- Plenary · (252 days ago)
- Next scheduled step
- No further step is scheduled in the source.
Procedure timeline
2025/2054(INI) · INI
Recorded procedure activities. These do not establish whether a law has entered into force.
- Recorded: Referral
- Recorded: Committee stage
- Latest recorded: Plenary
Recorded activities (11)
- Referral to committee
- Committee report tabled
- Committee amendments tabled
- Committee report adopted
- Tabling for plenary
- Tabling for plenary
- Tabling for plenary
- Tabling for plenary
- Plenary debate
- Plenary vote
- Plenary vote results
Scheduled activities (not confirmation of completion)
- Plenary debate
- Plenary vote
Procedure file (OEIL) · European Parliament data
Retrieved:
Sources
Data: EP Open Data API
What is this about?
- Maritime diplomacy as key to EU fisheries competitiveness.
- Strengthening EU leadership in global sustainability and trade.
- Focus on IUU fishing combat and maritime security.
Amendment history (2)
Wording as published by the EP, in English.
- Amendment 1Adopted
Paragraph 35 a (new)
Tabled by Emma Fourreau, Mélissa Camara, Eric Sargiacomo +72 · Members
Added: 35a. Expresses its concerns about the expansion and concentration of krill fishing catches in the Southern Ocean by some non-EU countries over the past decade and the associated threats for Antarctic ecosystems;
- Amendment 2Adopted
Paragraph 35 b (new)
Tabled by Emma Fourreau, Mélissa Camara, Eric Sargiacomo +72 · Members
Added: 35b. Calls on the Commission to support a five-year moratorium on krill fisheries in the Southern Ocean;
Vote by political group
How the political groups voted
Renew Europe (Renew)- 62For
- 2Against
- 6Abstention
- 7Did not vote
Progressive Alliance of Socialists and Democrats (S&D)- 121For
- 0Against
- 3Abstention
- 11Did not vote
European Conservatives and Reformists (ECR)- 69For
- 4Against
- 3Abstention
- 5Did not vote
European People's Party (EPP)- 165For
- 0Against
- 1Abstention
- 19Did not vote
Non-attached Members (NI)- 12For
- 6Against
- 7Abstention
- 5Did not vote
The Left in the European Parliament (GUE/NGL)- 1For
- 3Against
- 39Abstention
- 3Did not vote
Patriots for Europe (PfE)- 0For
- 69Against
- 8Abstention
- 8Did not vote
Europe of Sovereign Nations (ESN)- 0For
- 23Against
- 2Abstention
- 2Did not vote
Greens/European Free Alliance (Greens/EFA)- 0For
- 0Against
- 46Abstention
- 7Did not vote
Members
Showing 10 of 719
| Name | Country | Group | Vote Position |
|---|---|---|---|
 Sweden | Renew | For | |
 Italy | S&D | For | |
 Belgium | S&D | For | |
 France | ECR | For | |
| Italy | S&D | For | |
 Poland | ECR | For | |
 Germany | EPP | For | |
 Romania | EPP | For | |
| Italy | S&D | For | |
| Italy | S&D | For |
