EN

Vote in the European Parliament

Amending Regulations (EU) 2024/1689 and (EU) 2018/1139 as regards the simplification of the implementation of harmonised rules on artificial intelligence (Digital Omnibus on AI)

Date: 26.03.2026·Reference: A10-0073/2026
Rapporteur: Michael McNamara, Arba Kokalari
approximation of lawsartificial intelligenceinformation securitybiometricsnew technologyinformation systempersonal datasmart technologyharmonisation of standardsdigital literacydata protectioncreative industry

Overall Result

Rejected
  • 199 For
  • 436 Against
  • 2 Abstention
  • 81 Did not vote
Amendment— You are viewing a sub-vote (amendment) of the main vote.Amendment 98 · Amendments to Regulation (EU) 2024/1689 · Tabled by ECRView amendment at the EP ↗
Amendment wording

Tabled by Piotr Müller, Assita Kanko, Stefano Cavedagna, Kosma Złotowski

Added: (26a) in Article 78, the following paragraph 6 is inserted: '6. Where, for the purposes of this Regulation, a competent authority or the Commission requires access to the source code, the provider may request that the inspection, audit or verification shall be conducted on-site at the provider's premises or within a secure, air-gapped digital environment, under the provider's technical supervision. This request shall be granted where the provider demonstrates that the documentation or code is critical to the cybersecurity, integrity, or safe operation of the provider’s AI systems, or of third-party AI systems that depend on said source code. Such an arrangement shall not limit the authority's power to conduct a full inspection, audit or verification as foreseen under this Regulation, but shall govern the physical and digital custody of the materials.

Wording as published by the EP, in English. PE783.017

← Back to Main Vote
Status and procedure

Outcome as recorded by the European Parliament.

Vote held on
Latest recorded step
Official Journal · (112 days ago)
Next scheduled step
No further step is scheduled in the source.
Publication in the Official Journal recorded

Procedure timeline

2025/0359(COD) · COD

Recorded procedure activities. These do not establish whether a law has entered into force.

  1. Recorded: Referral17 days until the next step
  2. Recorded: Committee stage42 days until the next step
  3. Recorded: Plenary7 days until the next step
  4. Recorded: Negotiations68 days until the next step
  5. Recorded: Committee stage8 days until the next step
  6. Recorded: Plenary28 days until the next step
  7. Recorded: Signature16 days until the next step
  8. Latest recorded: Official Journal
Recorded activities (36)
  1. Referral to committee
  2. Committee report tabled
  3. Committee amendments tabled
  4. Committee amendments tabled
  5. Committee amendments tabled
  6. Committee opinion adopted
  7. Committee opinion adopted
  8. Committee report adopted
  9. Committee opinion adopted
  10. Tabling for plenary
  11. Tabling for plenary
  12. Tabling for plenary
  13. Tabling for plenary
  14. Tabling for plenary
  15. Tabling for plenary
  16. Tabling for plenary
  17. Text amended in plenary
  18. Referred back to committee for interinstitutional negotiations
  19. Interinstitutional negotiations
  20. Tabling for plenary
  21. Plenary vote
  22. Plenary vote results
  23. Interinstitutional negotiations
  24. Interinstitutional negotiations
  25. Provisional agreement approved in committee
  26. Tabling for plenary
  27. Tabling for plenary
  28. Tabling for plenary
  29. Tabling for plenary
  30. Tabling for plenary
  31. Plenary debate
  32. Parliament’s first-reading position
  33. Plenary vote
  34. Plenary vote results
  35. Signature
  36. Publication in the Official Journal
Scheduled activities (not confirmation of completion)
  1. Plenary vote
  2. Plenary debate
  3. Plenary vote

Procedure file (OEIL) · European Parliament data
Retrieved:

Sources

Roll-call minutesParliament documentProcedure file (OEIL)

Data: EP Open Data API

What is this about?

  • Amendments to AI Regulations (EU) 2024/1689 and (EU) 2018/1139 .
  • Focus on simplification and practical implementation of AI rules.
  • Second reading by Internal Market and Fundamental Rights committees.
Source: AI Summary with Mistral

Vote by political group

How the political groups voted

Renew Europe (Renew)
For0
  • 0For
  • 69Against
  • 0Abstention
  • 8Did not vote
View details
European Conservatives and Reformists (ECR)
For74
  • 74For
  • 0Against
  • 0Abstention
  • 7Did not vote
View details
Patriots for Europe (PfE)
For83
  • 83For
  • 0Against
  • 0Abstention
  • 2Did not vote
View details
Europe of Sovereign Nations (ESN)
For27
  • 27For
  • 0Against
  • 0Abstention
  • 0Did not vote
View details
European People's Party (EPP)
For1
  • 1For
  • 164Against
  • 0Abstention
  • 19Did not vote
View details
Non-attached Members (NI)
For14
  • 14For
  • 10Against
  • 2Abstention
  • 4Did not vote
View details
Progressive Alliance of Socialists and Democrats (S&D)
For0
  • 0For
  • 108Against
  • 0Abstention
  • 27Did not vote
View details
Greens/European Free Alliance (Greens/EFA)
For0
  • 0For
  • 48Against
  • 0Abstention
  • 5Did not vote
View details
The Left in the European Parliament (GUE/NGL)
For0
  • 0For
  • 37Against
  • 0Abstention
  • 9Did not vote
View details

Members

Showing 10 of 718

Vote Position
NameCountryGroupVote Position
Joachim Stanisław BrudzińskiJoachim Stanisław Brudziński
PolandECR
For
Julie RechagneuxJulie Rechagneux
FrancePfE
For
Zsuzsanna BorvendégZsuzsanna Borvendég
HungaryESN
For
Philippe OlivierPhilippe Olivier
FrancePfE
For
Gilles PennelleGilles Pennelle
FrancePfE
For
Jadwiga WiśniewskaJadwiga Wiśniewska
PolandECR
For
Nora Junco GarcíaNora Junco García
SpainECR
For
Maciej WąsikMaciej Wąsik
PolandECR
For
Carlo CiccioliCarlo Ciccioli
ItalyECR
For
Laurence TrochuLaurence Trochu
FranceECR
For
Show more
← Go back
Follow us on Instagram@checksomevotes@checksomevotes_en