Vote in the European Parliament
Adjustment of customs duties on the import of certain goods originating in the United States of America and opening of tariff quotas for imports of certain goods originating in the United States of America
Overall Result
Rejected- 160 For
- 462 Against
- 16 Abstention
- 80 Did not vote
How we count
- Yes, No and Abstention come from the European Parliament's roll-call voting protocol.
- “Did not vote” is derived: MEPs with a mandate on the voting day for whom no vote was recorded. Abstentions do not count towards this.
- Subsequent vote corrections are shown but do not change the official result.
- Each vote (overall vote, amendment, partial vote) counts separately. Therefore totals may differ from pages that count differently.
This is not a vote on the substance of the text, but on a proposal to reject it as a whole. Voting in favour is therefore a vote against the text; if the proposal is rejected, the procedure continues.
Status and procedure
Outcome as recorded by the European Parliament.
- Vote held on
- Latest recorded step
- Official Journal · (136 days ago)
- Next scheduled step
- No further step is scheduled in the source.
- Publication in the Official Journal recorded
Procedure timeline
2025/0261(COD) · COD
Recorded procedure activities. These do not establish whether a law has entered into force.
- Recorded: Referral
- Recorded: Committee stage
- Recorded: Plenary
- Recorded: Negotiations
- Recorded: Committee stage
- Recorded: Plenary
- Recorded: Signature
- Latest recorded: Official Journal
Recorded activities (31)
- Referral to committee
- Committee report tabled
- Committee amendments tabled
- Committee opinion adopted
- Committee opinion adopted
- Committee report adopted
- Tabling for plenary
- Tabling for plenary
- Tabling for plenary
- Tabling for plenary
- Tabling for plenary
- Text amended in plenary
- Referred back to committee for interinstitutional negotiations
- Plenary debate
- Plenary vote
- Plenary vote results
- Interinstitutional negotiations
- Interinstitutional negotiations
- Interinstitutional negotiations
- Provisional agreement approved in committee
- Tabling for plenary
- Tabling for plenary
- Tabling for plenary
- Tabling for plenary
- Tabling for plenary
- Plenary debate
- Parliament’s first-reading position
- Plenary vote
- Plenary vote results
- Signature
- Publication in the Official Journal
Scheduled activities (not confirmation of completion)
- Plenary debate
- Plenary vote
- Plenary debate
- Plenary vote
Procedure file (OEIL) · European Parliament data
Retrieved:
Sources
Data: EP Open Data API
What is this about?
- Tariff reductions for US goods in response to US trade measures.
- Safeguard clauses in case of violations of the Joint Declaration.
- Evaluation after six months and before expiry of validity.
Amendment history (14)
Wording as published by the EP, in English.
Recital 1 a (new)
Tabled by Manon Aubry, Marina Mesure, Arash Saeidi · The Left
Added: (1 a) The European Union expresses deep concern at the worrying increase in executions and death sentences in the United States; recalls that the abolition of the death penalty is a fundamental value of the Union, enshrined in Article 2 TEU and the Charter of Fundamental Rights; considers that pursuing or concluding agreements in such a context is incompatible with the Union’s values and undermines the credibility of its external action.
Recital 1 b (new)
Tabled by Marina Mesure, Manon Aubry, Arash Saeidi · The Left
Added: (1 b) The European Union recalls that the Union’s external action must be guided by the principles of sovereignty, the rule of law and respect for its institutional framework, in accordance with Articles 2 and 21 TEU; strongly condemns the imposition of sanctions, including travel bans, by the United States against a former European Commissioner for the implementation of EU legislation; considers that such measures constitute an unacceptable form of external pressure on the Union’s regulatory sovereignty and democratic decision-making; takes the view that, in this context, no agreement with the United States should be concluded.
Recital 1 c (new)
Tabled by Manon Aubry, Marina Mesure, Arash Saeidi · The Left
Added: (1 c) The recent conduct of the United States administration, marked by multiple violations of international law, including serious threats to the territorial integrity of allied countries, military aggression against Iran, the US’s responsibility for the deaths of many civilians, including the bombing of a girls’ school, hostility towards international justice and deliberate efforts to weaken Europe, shows that the United States can no longer be regarded as a fully reliable and democratic partner for the European Union.
Recital 2 a (new)
Tabled by Manon Aubry, Marina Mesure, Arash Saeidi · The Left
Added: (2 a) The trade agreement announced on 27 July 2025 was concluded in an informal, private setting – a golf course in Scotland owned by the President of the United States – not covered by any institutional procedure provided for by the Treaties of the European Union. Holding discussions that are decisive for European trade and agriculture policy in a private venue linked to one of the parties raises serious doubts about the transparency, democratic accountability and integrity of the decision-making process. Such a framework is incompatible with the requirements of diligence, independence and neutrality that is required to govern the conduct of the common commercial policy in accordance with Article 207 TFEU.
Recital 2 b (new)
Tabled by Manon Aubry, Marina Mesure, Arash Saeidi · The Left
Added: (2 b) The United States chose not to participate in COP30 in Belém, demonstrating a lack of commitment to international climate governance. Further opening up the European market to American agricultural products without environmental conditions is therefore incompatible with the Union’s climate objectives.
Recital 2 c (new)
Tabled by Manon Aubry, Marina Mesure, Arash Saeidi · The Left
Added: (2 c) The United States is not a party to the Paris Agreement under the UNFCCC after its withdrawal from the Agreement has been notified. In this case, no agreement could be initiated until the United States has rejoined the Paris Agreement and confirmed its commitment to implement its nationally determined contributions.
Recital 2 d (new)
Tabled by Manon Aubry, Marina Mesure, Arash Saeidi · The Left
Added: (2 d) The European Union considers that no trade or political agreement with a third country can be concluded or even envisaged where that partner challenges or threatens the sovereignty and territorial integrity of a Member State or an associated territory; the Union cannot accept any commitments with a partner adopting such positions, notably with regard to Greenland.
Recital 2 e (new)
Tabled by Manon Aubry, Marina Mesure, Arash Saeidi · The Left
Added: (2 e) This Regulation exempts United States industrial products imported to the Union from tariffs and grants further market access to United States agricultural products while Union products will be subject to a 15 % tariff rate, thereby creating systemic unfair terms of trade to the expense of the Union.
Recital 3 a (new)
Tabled by Manon Aubry, Marina Mesure, Arash Saeidi · The Left
Added: (3 a) The European Union regrets that the so-called “Turnberry” political agreement contains unprecedented concessions, particularly in the areas of energy, investment, and industrial cooperation, and does not appear to have any legal basis on an explicit, precise, and up-to-date mandate of negotiation, in accordance with Article 207 of the TFEU.
Recital 4 a (new)
Tabled by Manon Aubry, Marina Mesure, Arash Saeidi · The Left
Added: (4 a) United States agriculture continues to make extensive use of active substances that are banned in the European Union, and the proposed agreement thus creates structural unfair competition between European producers who adhere to a more sustainable and virtuous model and United States imports produced under lax standards, generating an increased risk to the health of European consumers. There is therefore concern about the European Commission’s future responsibility for diseases linked to these imports and their consumption by European citizens.
Recital 4 b (new)
Tabled by Manon Aubry, Marina Mesure, Arash Saeidi · The Left
Added: (4 b) The European Union stresses that the United States is one of the European Union’s main competitors in the agricultural sector, with significant differences in production standards, regulatory frameworks and cost structures; considers that this agreement undermines Union standards and the sustainability of the European agricultural model, to the exclusive benefit of the United States. It undermines European food sovereignty, is contrary to CAP objectives and creates a major tariff imbalance without adequate and robust safeguards.
Recital 9 a (new)
Tabled by Per Clausen · The Left
Added: (9 a) Whereas this agreement should not take effect for as long as the Trump-administration does not swear off the prospect of annexing or otherwise taking over Greenland, or in any other way threatens the territorial integrity of any Member State of the Union.
Recital 9 b (new)
Tabled by Per Clausen · The Left
Added: (9 b) Whereas any threats from the United States side, whether made formally, in speeches or via social media posts from members of the United States administration, made against any Union Member State should lead to the immediate suspension of this agreement.
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 – point d a (new)
Tabled by Per Clausen · The Left
Added: (d a) where the United States administration makes any claims to Greenland, threatens to annex Greenland, sends unannounced military forces, or is suspected, by the authorities in Greenland, Denmark or any other EU country, of launching any influence operations in Greenland.
Vote by political group
How the political groups voted
- 14For
- 53Against
- 0Abstention
- 10Did not vote
- 35For
- 0Against
- 0Abstention
- 11Did not vote
- 21For
- 4Against
- 0Abstention
- 5Did not vote
- 8For
- 100Against
- 3Abstention
- 24Did not vote
- 40For
- 31Against
- 12Abstention
- 2Did not vote
- 20For
- 6Against
- 0Abstention
- 1Did not vote
- 21For
- 25Against
- 1Abstention
- 6Did not vote
- 1For
- 74Against
- 0Abstention
- 6Did not vote
- 0For
- 169Against
- 0Abstention
- 15Did not vote
Members
Showing 10 of 718
| Name | Country | Group | Vote Position |
|---|---|---|---|
For | |||
For | |||
For | |||
For | |||
For | |||
For | |||
For | |||
For | |||
For | |||
For |