Vote in the European Parliament
RECOMMENDATION on the draft Council decision on the conclusion, on behalf of the European Union, of the United Nations Convention on the International Effects of Judicial Sales of Ships
Ton Diepeveen – Draft Council decision
Date: 26.03.2026Reference: A10-0049/2026enforcement of rulingUN conventionmaritime lawcross-border dimensionjurisdictionvesseljudicial cooperationsaleprivate international lawmaritime shippingratification of an agreement
Overall Result
Adopted- 605 For
- 3 Against
- 9 Abstention
- 101 Did not vote
How we count
- Yes, No and Abstention come from the European Parliament's roll-call voting protocol.
- “Did not vote” is derived: MEPs with a mandate on the voting day for whom no vote was recorded. Abstentions do not count towards this.
- Subsequent vote corrections are shown but do not change the official result.
- Each vote (overall vote, amendment, partial vote) counts separately. Therefore totals may differ from pages that count differently.
Status and procedure
Outcome as recorded by the European Parliament.
- Vote held on
- Latest recorded step
- Official Journal · (179 days ago)
- Next scheduled step
- No further step is scheduled in the source.
- Publication in the Official Journal recorded
Procedure timeline
2025/0233(NLE) · NLE
Recorded procedure activities. These do not establish whether a law has entered into force.
- Recorded: Referral
- Recorded: Committee stage
- Recorded: Plenary
- Recorded: Other activity
- Latest recorded: Official Journal
Recorded activities (8)
- Referral to committee
- Committee report tabled
- Committee report adopted
- Tabling for plenary
- Other recorded activity
- Plenary vote
- Plenary vote results
- Publication in the Official Journal
Scheduled activities (not confirmation of completion)
- Plenary vote
Procedure file (OEIL) · European Parliament data
Retrieved:
Sources
Data: EP Open Data API
What is this about?
- Approval of UN Convention on forced ship sales .
- Harmonization of cross-border ship sales and property rights .
- Risk of regulatory shopping and weaker standards.
Vote by political group
How the political groups voted
For68
- 68For
- 1Against
- 0Abstention
- 8Did not vote
For21
- 21For
- 0Against
- 3Abstention
- 22Did not vote
For23
- 23For
- 2Against
- 1Abstention
- 4Did not vote
For167
- 167For
- 0Against
- 0Abstention
- 17Did not vote
For23
- 23For
- 0Against
- 4Abstention
- 0Did not vote
For74
- 74For
- 0Against
- 0Abstention
- 7Did not vote
For101
- 101For
- 0Against
- 1Abstention
- 33Did not vote
For83
- 83For
- 0Against
- 0Abstention
- 2Did not vote
For45
- 45For
- 0Against
- 0Abstention
- 8Did not vote
Members
Showing 10 of 718
| Name | Country | Group | Vote Position |
|---|---|---|---|
For | |||
For | |||
For | |||
For | |||
For | |||
For | |||
For | |||
For | |||
For | |||
For |