Vote in the European Parliament
REPORT on tackling barriers to the single market for defence
Date: 11.03.2026Reference: A10-0017/2026Overall Result
Adopted- 393 For
- 169 Against
- 67 Abstention
- 89 Did not vote
How we count
- Yes, No and Abstention come from the European Parliament's roll-call voting protocol.
- “Did not vote” is derived: MEPs with a mandate on the voting day for whom no vote was recorded. Abstentions do not count towards this.
- Subsequent vote corrections are shown but do not change the official result.
- Each vote (overall vote, amendment, partial vote) counts separately. Therefore totals may differ from pages that count differently.
Status and procedure
Outcome as recorded by the European Parliament.
- Vote held on
- Latest recorded step
- Plenary · (280 days ago)
- Next scheduled step
- No further step is scheduled in the source.
Procedure timeline
2025/2143(INI) · INI
Recorded procedure activities. These do not establish whether a law has entered into force.
- Recorded: Referral
- Recorded: Committee stage
- Latest recorded: Plenary
Recorded activities (11)
- Referral to committee
- Committee report tabled
- Committee amendments tabled
- Committee opinion adopted
- Committee opinion adopted
- Committee report adopted
- Tabling for plenary
- Tabling for plenary
- Plenary debate
- Plenary vote
- Plenary vote results
Scheduled activities (not confirmation of completion)
- Plenary debate
- Plenary vote
Procedure file (OEIL) · European Parliament data
Retrieved:
Sources
Data: EP Open Data API
What is this about?
- Demand for a defence single market by 2030 .
- Removal of fragmentation and national obstacles in the EDTIB.
- Strengthening strategic autonomy and competitiveness in Europe.
Amendment history (2)
Wording as published by the EP, in English.
- Amendment 1Rejected
Paragraph 1 a (new)
Tabled by Jordan Bardella, Mathilde Androuët, Christophe Bay +78 · Members
Added: 1a. Opposes the concept of a ‘single market for defence’ that fails to take into account the specific characteristics of defence markets, including the particular nature of the armaments sector, Member States’ sovereignty, and their foreign and defence policies; stresses that any European defence cooperation must fully respect these considerations and remain based on voluntary intergovernmental coordination;
- Amendment 2Rejected
Paragraph 18
Tabled by Jordan Bardella, Mathilde Androuët, Christophe Bay +78 · Members
18. Calls on the
Removed: Commission to issue a recommendation for an interpretation of Article 346 TFEU in order to facilitate a harmonised and uniform approach throughout the EU, addressing the need to protect strictly the essential security interestsAdded: Commission, when addressing matters related to Article 346 TFEU, to fully respect the prerogatives of Member States,Removed: and for Article 346 to be used exceptionally, in line with the current reality of an interdependent security architecture in the EU; considers that the Commission should be enabled to assess the overall implementation of Article 346 TFEU, on a case-by-case basis, to remedy any potential structural misuse, in line with the CJEU case-law and with the current reality of an interdependent security architecture in the EU;Added: for the protection of the essential interests of their security which are connected with the production of, or trade in, arms, munitions and war material; stresses that the assessment of such interests lies exclusively with Member States and is not subject to a harmonised interpretation at EU level; recalls, in this context, that export controls in the defence sector remain under Member States’ competence in accordance with the Treaties, and emphasises that any EU action in this area should fully respect Member States’ foreign and security policy decisions;
Vote by political group
How the political groups voted
- 3For
- 20Against
- 3Abstention
- 5Did not vote
- 156For
- 4Against
- 2Abstention
- 22Did not vote
- 116For
- 0Against
- 4Abstention
- 15Did not vote
- 66For
- 1Against
- 2Abstention
- 7Did not vote
- 46For
- 0Against
- 1Abstention
- 6Did not vote
- 4For
- 36Against
- 2Abstention
- 4Did not vote
- 2For
- 35Against
- 39Abstention
- 5Did not vote
- 0For
- 48Against
- 14Abstention
- 22Did not vote
- 0For
- 25Against
- 0Abstention
- 3Did not vote
Members
Showing 10 of 718
| Name | Country | Group | Vote Position |
|---|---|---|---|
For | |||
For | |||
For | |||
For | |||
For | |||
For | |||
For | |||
For | |||
For | |||
For |