Vote in the European Parliament

REPORT on tackling barriers to the single market for defence

Date: 11.03.2026·Reference: A10-0017/2026
Rapporteur: Tobias Cremer

Overall Result

Adopted
  • 393 For
  • 169 Against
  • 67 Abstention
  • 89 Did not vote
Status and procedure

Outcome as recorded by the European Parliament.

Vote held on
Latest recorded step
Plenary · (280 days ago)
Next scheduled step
No further step is scheduled in the source.

Procedure timeline

2025/2143(INI) · INI

Recorded procedure activities. These do not establish whether a law has entered into force.

  1. Recorded: Referral97 days until the next step
  2. Recorded: Committee stage114 days until the next step
  3. Latest recorded: Plenary280 days since this step began
Recorded activities (11)
  1. Referral to committee
  2. Committee report tabled
  3. Committee amendments tabled
  4. Committee opinion adopted
  5. Committee opinion adopted
  6. Committee report adopted
  7. Tabling for plenary
  8. Tabling for plenary
  9. Plenary debate
  10. Plenary vote
  11. Plenary vote results
Scheduled activities (not confirmation of completion)
  1. Plenary debate
  2. Plenary vote

Procedure file (OEIL) · European Parliament data
Retrieved:

Sources

Data: EP Open Data API

What is this about?

  • Demand for a defence single market by 2030 .
  • Removal of fragmentation and national obstacles in the EDTIB.
  • Strengthening strategic autonomy and competitiveness in Europe.
Source: AI Summary with Mistral

Amendment history (2)

Wording as published by the EP, in English.

  1. Amendment 1Rejected

    Paragraph 1 a (new)

    Tabled by Jordan Bardella, Mathilde Androuët, Christophe Bay +78 · Members

    Added: 1a. Opposes the concept of a ‘single market for defence’ that fails to take into account the specific characteristics of defence markets, including the particular nature of the armaments sector, Member States’ sovereignty, and their foreign and defence policies; stresses that any European defence cooperation must fully respect these considerations and remain based on voluntary intergovernmental coordination;

  2. Amendment 2Rejected

    Paragraph 18

    Tabled by Jordan Bardella, Mathilde Androuët, Christophe Bay +78 · Members

    18. Calls on the Removed: Commission to issue a recommendation for an interpretation of Article 346 TFEU in order to facilitate a harmonised and uniform approach throughout the EU, addressing the need to protect strictly the essential security interests Added: Commission, when addressing matters related to Article 346 TFEU, to fully respect the prerogatives of Member States, Removed: and for Article 346 to be used exceptionally, in line with the current reality of an interdependent security architecture in the EU; considers that the Commission should be enabled to assess the overall implementation of Article 346 TFEU, on a case-by-case basis, to remedy any potential structural misuse, in line with the CJEU case-law and with the current reality of an interdependent security architecture in the EU; Added: for the protection of the essential interests of their security which are connected with the production of, or trade in, arms, munitions and war material; stresses that the assessment of such interests lies exclusively with Member States and is not subject to a harmonised interpretation at EU level; recalls, in this context, that export controls in the defence sector remain under Member States’ competence in accordance with the Treaties, and emphasises that any EU action in this area should fully respect Member States’ foreign and security policy decisions;

Vote by political group

How the political groups voted

Members

Showing 10 of 718

Vote Position
NameCountryGroupVote Position
GermanyEPP
For
DenmarkEPP
For
RomaniaS&D
For
GermanyRenew
For
SpainEPP
For
BelgiumEPP
For
PolandEPP
For
SlovakiaRenew
For
EstoniaS&D
For
BulgariaEPP
For
Show more
Follow us on Instagram@checksomevotes@checksomevotes_en