Vote in the European Parliament

REPORT on public access to documents – report covering the years 2022 - 2024

Date: 10.03.2026·Reference: A10-0011/2026
Rapporteur: Veronika Cifrová Ostrihoňová

Overall Result

Rejected
  • 176 For
  • 431 Against
  • 1 Abstention
  • 110 Did not vote
Amendment— You are viewing a sub-vote (amendment) of the main vote.Amendment 14 · Tabled by ESNView amendment at the EP ↗
Amendment wording

Tabled by Mary Khan, Christine Anderson, Milan Uhrík

Added: 37a. Notes that systemic delays and inadequate record preservation practices identified in Ombudsman inquiries and case-law demonstrate structural shortcomings in the current framework; calls for the revised transparency rules to include enforceable consequences where institutions fail to preserve documents or repeatedly disregard statutory deadlines, including proportionate administrative and disciplinary measures; stresses that transparency obligations must be effective in practice and not merely declaratory;

Wording as published by the EP, in English. PE782.975v01-00

← Back to Main Vote
Status and procedure

Outcome as recorded by the European Parliament.

Vote held on
Latest recorded step
Plenary · (284 days ago)
Next scheduled step
No further step is scheduled in the source.

Procedure timeline

2025/2137(INI) · INI

Recorded procedure activities. These do not establish whether a law has entered into force.

  1. Recorded: Referral96 days until the next step
  2. Recorded: Committee stage111 days until the next step
  3. Latest recorded: Plenary284 days since this step began
Recorded activities (9)
  1. Referral to committee
  2. Committee report tabled
  3. Committee amendments tabled
  4. Committee report adopted
  5. Tabling for plenary
  6. Tabling for plenary
  7. Tabling for plenary
  8. Plenary vote
  9. Plenary vote results
Scheduled activities (not confirmation of completion)
  1. Plenary vote

Procedure file (OEIL) · European Parliament data
Retrieved:

Sources

Data: EP Open Data API

What is this about?

  • Transparency as a fundamental right for democratic participation demanded.
  • Criticism of systematic delays in document access.
  • Call for proactive publication of all EU documents.
Source: AI Summary with Mistral

Vote by political group

How the political groups voted

Members

Showing 10 of 718

Vote Position
NameCountryGroupVote Position
PolandECR
For
AustriaPfE
For
PolandECR
For
ItalyECR
For
HungaryPfE
For
ItalyECR
For
FrancePfE
For
DenmarkECR
For
NetherlandsECR
For
RomaniaECR
For
Show more
Follow us on Instagram@checksomevotes@checksomevotes_en