Vote in the European Parliament

Fisheries management approaches for safeguarding sensitive species, tackling invasive species and benefiting local economies

Date: 10.03.2026·Reference: A10-0018/2026
Rapporteur: André Franqueira Rodrigues

Overall Result

Adopted
  • 528 For
  • 21 Against
  • 62 Abstention
  • 107 Did not vote
Status and procedure

Outcome as recorded by the European Parliament.

Vote held on
Latest recorded step
Plenary · (280 days ago)
Next scheduled step
No further step is scheduled in the source.

Procedure timeline

2025/2011(INI) · INI

Recorded procedure activities. These do not establish whether a law has entered into force.

  1. Recorded: Referral89 days until the next step
  2. Recorded: Committee stage290 days until the next step
  3. Latest recorded: Plenary280 days since this step began
Recorded activities (7)
  1. Referral to committee
  2. Committee report tabled
  3. Committee report adopted
  4. Tabling for plenary
  5. Tabling for plenary
  6. Plenary vote
  7. Plenary vote results
Scheduled activities (not confirmation of completion)
  1. Plenary vote

Procedure file (OEIL) · European Parliament data
Retrieved:

Sources

Data: EP Open Data API

What is this about?

  • Protection of vulnerable marine species and local fishing economies.
  • Reduce invasive species by 50 % by 2030 .
  • Demand for ecosystem-based fisheries management and data harmonization.
Source: AI Summary with Mistral

Amendment history (3)

Wording as published by the EP, in English.

  1. Amendment 1Adopted

    Recital Z a (new)

    Tabled by Anja Hazekamp, César Luena, Sirpa Pietikäinen +81 · Members

    Added: Za. whereas during a public consultation organised by the Commission, 94 % of all respondents indicated that they were against or strongly against the placing of seal products on the market, rejecting it as a fisheries management measure; whereas 89 % of respondents indicated that seal hunting raises significant moral concerns1a; 1a European Commission, ‘Trade in seal products – fitness check of EU rules’, European Commission website.

  2. Amendment 2Rejected

    Paragraph 16

    Tabled by Anja Hazekamp, César Luena, Petras Auštrevičius +82 · Members

    … size, the status and trends of species and the potential impacts that Removed: unbalanced Added: overfishing and unbalanced fish populations can have on Added: sensitive species such as whales and dolphins, and on the viability of fishing activities, to ensure ecosystem-based management of fisheries, including measures to protect …

  3. Amendment 3Rejected

    Paragraph 17

    Tabled by Anja Hazekamp, César Luena, Petras Auštrevičius +80 · Members

    … Directive to better facilitate active and effective population management and support ecosystem-based Removed: management; Added: management, while fully upholding the EU ban on trade in seal products in line with Regulation (EC) No 1007/2009 and Regulation (EU) 2015/17751a, which were introduced to address serious concerns from members of the public and governments regarding animal welfare considerations, owing to the suffering these animals endured when being killing; ___________________ 1a Regulation (EU) 2015/1775 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 6 October 2015 amending Regulation (EC) No 1007/2009 on trade in seal products and repealing Commission Regulation (EU) No 737/2010 (OJ L 262, 7.10.2015, p. 1, ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/reg/2015/1775/oj).

Vote by political group

How the political groups voted

Members

Showing 10 of 718

Vote Position
NameCountryGroupVote Position
GermanyEPP
For
AustriaS&D
For
FrancePfE
For
FranceRenew
For
SloveniaEPP
For
NetherlandsRenew
For
BulgariaEPP
For
GermanyS&D
For
GermanyEPP
For
SwedenS&D
For
Show more
Follow us on Instagram@checksomevotes@checksomevotes_en