EN
FrançaisVote in the European Parliament
Amending Regulation (EU) 2024/1348 as regards the application of the ‘safe third country’ concept
Lena Düpont – Proposal for rejection – Am 14= 15= 16=
Date: 10.02.2026Reference: A10-0255/2025EU migration policyrepatriation grantillegal migrationpublic safetythird countryinternational protectionright of asylumaid to refugeesreturn migrationforeign national
Overall Result
Rejected- 220 For
- 396 Against
- 37 Abstention
- 65 Did not vote
How we count
- Yes, No and Abstention come from the European Parliament's roll-call voting protocol.
- “Did not vote” is derived: MEPs with a mandate on the voting day for whom no vote was recorded. Abstentions do not count towards this.
- Subsequent vote corrections are shown but do not change the official result.
- Each vote (overall vote, amendment, partial vote) counts separately. Therefore totals may differ from pages that count differently.
Proposal to reject the text
This is not a vote on the substance of the text, but on a proposal to reject it as a whole. Voting in favour is therefore a vote against the text; if the proposal is rejected, the procedure continues.
Status and procedure
Outcome as recorded by the European Parliament.
- Vote held on
- Latest recorded step
- Official Journal · (260 days ago)
- Next scheduled step
- No further step is scheduled in the source.
- Publication in the Official Journal recorded
Procedure timeline
2025/0132(COD) · COD
Recorded procedure activities. These do not establish whether a law has entered into force.
- Recorded: Referral
- Recorded: Committee stage
- Recorded: Plenary
- Recorded: Negotiations
- Recorded: Committee stage
- Recorded: Plenary
- Recorded: Signature
- Latest recorded: Official Journal
Recorded activities (20)
- Referral to committee
- Committee report tabled
- Committee amendments tabled
- Committee report adopted
- Tabling for plenary
- Plenary endorses start of interinstitutional negotiations
- Interinstitutional negotiations
- Plenary vote
- Plenary vote results
- Provisional agreement approved in committee
- Tabling for plenary
- Tabling for plenary
- Tabling for plenary
- Tabling for plenary
- Tabling for plenary
- Parliament’s first-reading position
- Plenary vote
- Plenary vote results
- Signature
- Publication in the Official Journal
Scheduled activities (not confirmation of completion)
- Plenary vote
- Plenary vote
Procedure file (OEIL) · European Parliament data
Retrieved:
Sources
Data: EP Open Data API
What is this about?
- Bangladesh, Colombia, Egypt, Kosovo, India, Morocco and Tunisia to be considered safe for their own nationals
- EU candidate countries will also be presumed safe
- New conditions for EU member states to decide whether a country is safe for applicants who are not nationals of that given country
Vote by political group
How the political groups voted
Non-attached Members (NI)For5
- 5For
- 23Against
- 2Abstention
- 2Did not vote
The Left in the European Parliament (GUE/NGL)For42
- 42For
- 0Against
- 0Abstention
- 4Did not vote
Greens/European Free Alliance (Greens/EFA)For46
- 46For
- 0Against
- 1Abstention
- 6Did not vote
Progressive Alliance of Socialists and Democrats (S&D)For92
- 92For
- 19Against
- 10Abstention
- 14Did not vote
Renew Europe (Renew)For35
- 35For
- 17Against
- 15Abstention
- 8Did not vote
European People's Party (EPP)For0
- 0For
- 168Against
- 9Abstention
- 10Did not vote
European Conservatives and Reformists (ECR)For0
- 0For
- 73Against
- 0Abstention
- 6Did not vote
Patriots for Europe (PfE)For0
- 0For
- 71Against
- 0Abstention
- 13Did not vote
Europe of Sovereign Nations (ESN)For0
- 0For
- 25Against
- 0Abstention
- 2Did not vote
Members
Showing 10 of 718
| Name | Country | Group | Vote Position |
|---|---|---|---|
 Ireland | GUE/NGL | For | |
 Germany | Greens/EFA | For | |
 Greece | S&D | For | |
| Greece | GUE/NGL | For | |
 Spain | S&D | For | |
 Italy | S&D | For | |
| Italy | S&D | For | |
| Greece | GUE/NGL | For | |
| Italy | GUE/NGL | For | |
| Germany | S&D | For |
