EN
EspañolVote in the European Parliament
REPORT on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on European Union designs (codification)
Magdalena Adamowicz – Commission proposal
Date: 10.02.2026Reference: A10-0013/2026approximation of lawsdesigns and modelsEU trade markEuropean Union Intellectual Property Officeapplication of EU lawsingle market
Overall Result
Adopted- 613 For
- 5 Against
- 29 Abstention
- 71 Did not vote
How we count
- Yes, No and Abstention come from the European Parliament's roll-call voting protocol.
- “Did not vote” is derived: MEPs with a mandate on the voting day for whom no vote was recorded. Abstentions do not count towards this.
- Subsequent vote corrections are shown but do not change the official result.
- Each vote (overall vote, amendment, partial vote) counts separately. Therefore totals may differ from pages that count differently.
Status and procedure
Outcome as recorded by the European Parliament.
- Vote held on
- Latest recorded step
- Official Journal · (228 days ago)
- Next scheduled step
- No further step is scheduled in the source.
- Publication in the Official Journal recorded
Procedure timeline
2025/0190(COD) · COD
Recorded procedure activities. These do not establish whether a law has entered into force.
- Recorded: Referral
- Recorded: Committee stage
- Recorded: Plenary
- Recorded: Signature
- Latest recorded: Official Journal
Recorded activities (9)
- Referral to committee
- Committee report tabled
- Committee report adopted
- Tabling for plenary
- Parliament’s first-reading position
- Plenary vote
- Plenary vote results
- Signature
- Publication in the Official Journal
Scheduled activities (not confirmation of completion)
- Plenary vote
Procedure file (OEIL) · European Parliament data
Retrieved:
Sources
Data: EP Open Data API
What is this about?
- This regulation consolidates existing EU law on Community designs into a single codified text without introducing substantive changes.
- It aims to streamline the legal framework by incorporating Regulation (EC) No 6/2002 into a clearer structure.
- The process adheres to an accelerated procedure for official codification of legal acts.
- Only minor editorial adjustments, such as correcting wording in recitals, were made.
- The political objective is to enhance legal certainty and accessibility for design protection across the EU.
Vote by political group
How the political groups voted
Non-attached Members (NI)For26
- 26For
- 2Against
- 2Abstention
- 2Did not vote
European People's Party (EPP)For176
- 176For
- 0Against
- 0Abstention
- 11Did not vote
The Left in the European Parliament (GUE/NGL)For40
- 40For
- 0Against
- 0Abstention
- 6Did not vote
Progressive Alliance of Socialists and Democrats (S&D)For121
- 121For
- 0Against
- 0Abstention
- 14Did not vote
Renew Europe (Renew)For68
- 68For
- 0Against
- 0Abstention
- 7Did not vote
Patriots for Europe (PfE)For65
- 65For
- 0Against
- 6Abstention
- 13Did not vote
European Conservatives and Reformists (ECR)For67
- 67For
- 0Against
- 3Abstention
- 9Did not vote
Greens/European Free Alliance (Greens/EFA)For48
- 48For
- 0Against
- 0Abstention
- 5Did not vote
Europe of Sovereign Nations (ESN)For2
- 2For
- 3Against
- 18Abstention
- 4Did not vote
Members
Showing 10 of 718
| Name | Country | Group | Vote Position |
|---|---|---|---|
 Poland | EPP | For | |
 Greece | GUE/NGL | For | |
 Germany | S&D | For | |
 Italy | S&D | For | |
 France | EPP | For | |
| Germany | EPP | For | |
 Sweden | Renew | For | |
 Estonia | Renew | For | |
| Germany | EPP | For | |
 Bulgaria | EPP | For |
