EN
FrançaisVote in the European Parliament
REPORT on addressing impunity through EU sanctions, including the EU Global Human Rights Sanctions Regime (so-called ‘EU Magnitsky Act’)
Antonio López-Istúriz White – Motion for a resolution
Date: 21.01.2026Reference: A10-0266/2025common foreign and security policydemocracyfundamental rightscorruptionhuman rightsEU restrictive measureinternational sanctionsfreezing of assetsrule of lawhuman rights movementimpunitytravel ban (EU)
Overall Result
Adopted- 440 For
- 127 Against
- 59 Abstention
- 93 Did not vote
How we count
- Yes, No and Abstention come from the European Parliament's roll-call voting protocol.
- “Did not vote” is derived: MEPs with a mandate on the voting day for whom no vote was recorded. Abstentions do not count towards this.
- Subsequent vote corrections are shown but do not change the official result.
- Each vote (overall vote, amendment, partial vote) counts separately. Therefore totals may differ from pages that count differently.
Status and procedure
Outcome as recorded by the European Parliament.
- Vote held on
- Latest recorded step
- Plenary · (334 days ago)
- Next scheduled step
- No further step is scheduled in the source.
Procedure timeline
2025/2049(INI) · INI
Recorded procedure activities. These do not establish whether a law has entered into force.
- Recorded: Referral
- Recorded: Committee stage
- Latest recorded: Plenary
Recorded activities (7)
- Referral to committee
- Committee report tabled
- Committee amendments tabled
- Committee report adopted
- Tabling for plenary
- Plenary vote
- Plenary vote results
Scheduled activities (not confirmation of completion)
- Plenary vote
Procedure file (OEIL) · European Parliament data
Retrieved:
Sources
Data: EP Open Data API
What is this about?
- The EU’s Magnitsky Regulation enhances targeted sanctions against individuals and entities responsible for severe human rights violations globally.
- Its aim is to combat impunity by freezing assets and imposing travel bans.
- The regulation seeks to address gaps, particularly in geographic and thematic imbalances of listed entries.
- Future expansions may include corruption and transnational repression.
- Consistent implementation by all member states and greater transparency are key demands to improve effectiveness.
Vote by political group
How the political groups voted
Non-attached Members (NI)For2
- 2For
- 22Against
- 1Abstention
- 5Did not vote
Progressive Alliance of Socialists and Democrats (S&D)For115
- 115For
- 0Against
- 3Abstention
- 18Did not vote
Greens/European Free Alliance (Greens/EFA)For49
- 49For
- 1Against
- 0Abstention
- 3Did not vote
European People's Party (EPP)For159
- 159For
- 0Against
- 1Abstention
- 27Did not vote
Renew Europe (Renew)For67
- 67For
- 0Against
- 0Abstention
- 8Did not vote
The Left in the European Parliament (GUE/NGL)For18
- 18For
- 5Against
- 14Abstention
- 9Did not vote
European Conservatives and Reformists (ECR)For30
- 30For
- 6Against
- 33Abstention
- 10Did not vote
Patriots for Europe (PfE)For0
- 0For
- 73Against
- 6Abstention
- 7Did not vote
Europe of Sovereign Nations (ESN)For0
- 0For
- 20Against
- 1Abstention
- 6Did not vote
Members
Showing 10 of 719
| Name | Country | Group | Vote Position |
|---|---|---|---|
 Italy | S&D | For | |
 Austria | Greens/EFA | For | |
 Germany | Greens/EFA | For | |
 Slovenia | EPP | For | |
| Germany | Greens/EFA | For | |
 Spain | S&D | For | |
 Finland | Renew | For | |
| Spain | EPP | For | |
| Germany | EPP | For | |
| Austria | S&D | For |
