Vote in the European Parliament

Reform of the European Electoral Act – hurdles to ratification and implementation in the Member States

Borja Giménez Larraz – Motion for a resolution (as a whole)
Date: 20.01.2026·Reference: A10-0252/2025
Rapporteur: Borja Giménez Larraz

Overall Result

Adopted
  • 417 For
  • 234 Against
  • 9 Abstention
  • 59 Did not vote
Status and procedure

Outcome as recorded by the European Parliament.

Vote held on
Latest recorded step
Plenary · (340 days ago)
Next scheduled step
No further step is scheduled in the source.

Procedure timeline

2025/2028(INI) · INI

Recorded procedure activities. These do not establish whether a law has entered into force.

  1. Recorded: Referral138 days until the next step
  2. Recorded: Committee stage181 days until the next step
  3. Latest recorded: Plenary340 days since this step began
Recorded activities (8)
  1. Referral to committee
  2. Committee report tabled
  3. Committee amendments tabled
  4. Committee report adopted
  5. Tabling for plenary
  6. Tabling for plenary
  7. Plenary vote
  8. Plenary vote results
Scheduled activities (not confirmation of completion)
  1. Plenary vote

Procedure file (OEIL) · European Parliament data
Retrieved:

Sources

Data: EP Open Data API

What is this about?

  • The reform of the European Electoral Act seeks to harmonize electoral procedures across the EU and enhance the democratic legitimacy of the Parliament.
  • Key changes include a mandatory 2% threshold for member states with over 35 seats and measures to prevent double voting.
  • Political obstacles, particularly in Spain and Germany, delay ratification due to conflicting national interests and constitutional concerns.
  • Optional provisions, such as visibility of European parties on ballots, are rarely implemented, hindering the Europeanization of elections.
  • The goal is to increase voter participation and improve the transparency of the electoral process.
Source: Explanatory Statement (AI Generated)

Amendment history (4)

Wording as published by the EP, in English.

  1. Amendment 1Rejected

    Recital H

    Tabled by Stanisław Tyszka · ESN

    H. whereas Removed: despite several reforms, European elections are Removed: still mostly governed by national laws, electoral campaigning remains Removed: to a large extent national, and European political parties are Removed: unable to sufficiently fulfil their constitutional mandates and ‘contribute to forming European political awareness and to expressing the will of citizens of the Union’, as required by Article 10(4) TEU; whereas the recast of the regulation on the statute and funding of European political parties and European political foundations7 has brought a level of clarity in that respect; 7 Regulation (EU, Euratom) No 1141/2014 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 22 October 2014 on the statute and funding of European political parties and European political foundations, (OJ L 317, 4.11.2014, p. 1, ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/reg/2014/1141/oj). Added: composed of national political parties;

  2. Amendment 2Rejected

    Paragraph 3 a (new)

    Tabled by Sarah Knafo, Milan Uhrík · ESN

    Added: 3a. Considers that differences in the implementation of Council Decision (EU, Euratom) 2018/994 reflect legitimate constitutional choices made by Member States in accordance with their democratic processes; stresses that the absence of uniform transposition cannot be interpreted as a lack of commitment to democracy, but rather as an expression of the pluralism inherent to the Union;

  3. Amendment 4Rejected

    Paragraph 5 a (new)

    Tabled by Sarah Knafo, Milan Uhrík · ESN

    Added: 5a. Stresses that any measures aimed at increasing the visibility of European political parties or facilitating voting methods must fully respect Member States’ competences over electoral organisation, campaign rules and voting modalities, and must not undermine integrity, security or public trust in national electoral systems;

  4. Amendment 5Rejected

    Paragraph 12 a (new)

    Tabled by Stanisław Tyszka · ESN

    Added: 12a. Emphasises that political systems and electoral regulations remain a competence of the Member States; stresses that, while Parliament can suggest harmonisation of certain regulations, it remains the sovereign decision of each EU Member State whether such a measure fits and should be implemented within its political system;

Vote by political group

How the political groups voted

Members

Showing 10 of 719

Vote Position
NameCountryGroupVote Position
SlovakiaRenew
For
HungaryEPP
For
SwedenEPP
For
GermanyRenew
For
GermanyEPP
For
SpainEPP
For
FinlandEPP
For
FranceRenew
For
PolandRenew
For
PortugalEPP
For
Show more
Follow us on Instagram@checksomevotes@checksomevotes_en