Vote in the European Parliament
Reform of the European Electoral Act – hurdles to ratification and implementation in the Member States
Overall Result
Adopted- 417 For
- 234 Against
- 9 Abstention
- 59 Did not vote
How we count
- Yes, No and Abstention come from the European Parliament's roll-call voting protocol.
- “Did not vote” is derived: MEPs with a mandate on the voting day for whom no vote was recorded. Abstentions do not count towards this.
- Subsequent vote corrections are shown but do not change the official result.
- Each vote (overall vote, amendment, partial vote) counts separately. Therefore totals may differ from pages that count differently.
Status and procedure
Outcome as recorded by the European Parliament.
- Vote held on
- Latest recorded step
- Plenary · (340 days ago)
- Next scheduled step
- No further step is scheduled in the source.
Procedure timeline
2025/2028(INI) · INI
Recorded procedure activities. These do not establish whether a law has entered into force.
- Recorded: Referral
- Recorded: Committee stage
- Latest recorded: Plenary
Recorded activities (8)
- Referral to committee
- Committee report tabled
- Committee amendments tabled
- Committee report adopted
- Tabling for plenary
- Tabling for plenary
- Plenary vote
- Plenary vote results
Scheduled activities (not confirmation of completion)
- Plenary vote
Procedure file (OEIL) · European Parliament data
Retrieved:
Sources
Data: EP Open Data API
What is this about?
- The reform of the European Electoral Act seeks to harmonize electoral procedures across the EU and enhance the democratic legitimacy of the Parliament.
- Key changes include a mandatory 2% threshold for member states with over 35 seats and measures to prevent double voting.
- Political obstacles, particularly in Spain and Germany, delay ratification due to conflicting national interests and constitutional concerns.
- Optional provisions, such as visibility of European parties on ballots, are rarely implemented, hindering the Europeanization of elections.
- The goal is to increase voter participation and improve the transparency of the electoral process.
Amendment history (4)
Wording as published by the EP, in English.
- Amendment 1Rejected
Recital H
Tabled by Stanisław Tyszka · ESN
H. whereas
Removed: despite several reforms,European elections areRemoved: stillmostly governed by national laws, electoral campaigning remainsRemoved: to a large extentnational, and European political parties areRemoved: unable to sufficiently fulfil their constitutional mandates and ‘contribute to forming European political awareness and to expressing the will of citizens of the Union’, as required by Article 10(4) TEU; whereas the recast of the regulation on the statute and funding of European political parties and European political foundations7 has brought a level of clarity in that respect; 7 Regulation (EU, Euratom) No 1141/2014 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 22 October 2014 on the statute and funding of European political parties and European political foundations, (OJ L 317, 4.11.2014, p. 1, ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/reg/2014/1141/oj).Added: composed of national political parties; - Amendment 2Rejected
Paragraph 3 a (new)
Tabled by Sarah Knafo, Milan Uhrík · ESN
Added: 3a. Considers that differences in the implementation of Council Decision (EU, Euratom) 2018/994 reflect legitimate constitutional choices made by Member States in accordance with their democratic processes; stresses that the absence of uniform transposition cannot be interpreted as a lack of commitment to democracy, but rather as an expression of the pluralism inherent to the Union;
- Amendment 4Rejected
Paragraph 5 a (new)
Tabled by Sarah Knafo, Milan Uhrík · ESN
Added: 5a. Stresses that any measures aimed at increasing the visibility of European political parties or facilitating voting methods must fully respect Member States’ competences over electoral organisation, campaign rules and voting modalities, and must not undermine integrity, security or public trust in national electoral systems;
- Amendment 5Rejected
Paragraph 12 a (new)
Tabled by Stanisław Tyszka · ESN
Added: 12a. Emphasises that political systems and electoral regulations remain a competence of the Member States; stresses that, while Parliament can suggest harmonisation of certain regulations, it remains the sovereign decision of each EU Member State whether such a measure fits and should be implemented within its political system;
Vote by political group
How the political groups voted
- 4For
- 22Against
- 0Abstention
- 4Did not vote
- 66For
- 3Against
- 0Abstention
- 6Did not vote
- 173For
- 7Against
- 0Abstention
- 8Did not vote
- 103For
- 14Against
- 4Abstention
- 15Did not vote
- 47For
- 4Against
- 0Abstention
- 2Did not vote
- 22For
- 11Against
- 5Abstention
- 8Did not vote
- 2For
- 70Against
- 0Abstention
- 7Did not vote
- 0For
- 79Against
- 0Abstention
- 6Did not vote
- 0For
- 24Against
- 0Abstention
- 3Did not vote
Members
Showing 10 of 719
| Name | Country | Group | Vote Position |
|---|---|---|---|
For | |||
For | |||
For | |||
For | |||
For | |||
For | |||
For | |||
For | |||
For | |||
For |