Vote in the European Parliament
Just transition directive in the world of work: ensuring the creation of jobs and revitalising local economies
Overall Result
Adopted- 420 For
- 207 Against
- 20 Abstention
- 72 Did not vote
How we count
- Yes, No and Abstention come from the European Parliament's roll-call voting protocol.
- “Did not vote” is derived: MEPs with a mandate on the voting day for whom no vote was recorded. Abstentions do not count towards this.
- Subsequent vote corrections are shown but do not change the official result.
- Each vote (overall vote, amendment, partial vote) counts separately. Therefore totals may differ from pages that count differently.
Status and procedure
Outcome as recorded by the European Parliament.
- Vote held on
- Latest recorded step
- Plenary · (336 days ago)
- Next scheduled step
- No further step is scheduled in the source.
Procedure timeline
2025/2131(INL) · INL
Recorded procedure activities. These do not establish whether a law has entered into force.
- Recorded: Referral
- Recorded: Committee stage
- Latest recorded: Plenary
Recorded activities (12)
- Referral to committee
- Committee report tabled
- Committee amendments tabled
- Committee report adopted
- Committee opinion adopted
- Tabling for plenary
- Tabling for plenary
- Tabling for plenary
- Tabling for plenary
- Plenary debate
- Plenary vote
- Plenary vote results
Scheduled activities (not confirmation of completion)
- Plenary debate
- Plenary vote
Procedure file (OEIL) · European Parliament data
Retrieved:
Sources
Data: EP Open Data API
What is this about?
- The directive focuses on ensuring a just transition in the world of work to create jobs and revitalize local economies.
- It addresses the challenges of the green and digital transformation, particularly in vulnerable regions and sectors.
- Key objectives include promoting reskilling and upskilling to tackle labor shortages and secure employment.
- Social protection systems and social dialogue are reinforced to guarantee fair working conditions.
- The initiative aims to stimulate private investments and enhance the EU’s long-term competitiveness.
Amendment history (5)
Wording as published by the EP, in English.
- Amendment 1Rejected
Recital A
Tabled by Georgiana Teodorescu · ECR
… ensure that no one is left behind; whereas a fair transition alone
Removed: could yield 261 billion euro per year in benefits,Added: could, possibly, yield, relative to the baseline EUR 260 billion in 2050, particularly by addressing social inequalities and regionalRemoved: disparities8 ;Added: disparities8; whereas the pathways of each affected region will be different, based on … - Amendment 2Rejected
Recital E
Tabled by Marlena Maląg · ECR
E. whereas managing the shift
Removed: to a carbon neutral economyshould not only support transitions to new quality jobs in emerging sectors … on regions and industries dependent on fossil fuels is crucial as theseRemoved: will have to be redesigned to meet the Union’s climate commitments;Added: must be protected from deprivation; whereas it is important that everyone, including workers and jobseekers areRemoved: supportedAdded: involved in managing transitions in order toRemoved: foster understanding and acceptance and effectiveness of the goals of the 2050 long-term strategy;Added: build reasonable and acceptable solutions; whereas as shown by EurofoundRemoved: research9 ,Added: research9, broad involvement of civil society, social partners and public authorities in the … - Amendment 3Rejected
Recital F
Tabled by Marlena Maląg · ECR
… whereas Europe’s economic transformation requires a strong focus on competitiveness and growth; Added: whereas a slowdown of the pace of the implementation of the climate-neutral goals is essential in this regard; whereas the Emission Trading Scheme must be abandoned; whereas entrepreneurs and job creators must be given the right conditions to …
- Amendment 10Rejected
Recital F a (new)
Tabled by Sarah Knafo · ESN
Added: F a. whereas preserving and strengthening the European industrial base is essential in order to avoid relocations, the loss of strategic productive capacities and an increased dependence of the Union on third countries;
- Amendment 13Rejected
Paragraph 10 a (new)
Tabled by Séverine Werbrouck, Marie Dauchy, Margarita de la Pisa Carrión +3 · PfE
Added: 10a. Stresses that, in the face of the structural decline in the working-age population in the Member States, only a proactive birth-rate policy at Member State level, supported by Union institutions, can provide a long-term solution to this vital challenge to the economic and social model of the Member States; further underlines that under no circumstances does the replacement of European workers with jobseekers from third countries constitute a sustainable solution, and that such immigration entails other currently underestimated risks, notably in terms of security and social cohesion; insists on the need to better assess the long-term consequences of the decline in the working-age population for the economic and social model of the Member States and invites the Member States to prioritise its statistical monitoring and the sharing of the resulting data;
Vote by political group
How the political groups voted
- 20For
- 5Against
- 1Abstention
- 4Did not vote
- 140For
- 18Against
- 11Abstention
- 19Did not vote
- 125For
- 0Against
- 0Abstention
- 11Did not vote
- 36For
- 0Against
- 0Abstention
- 10Did not vote
- 50For
- 0Against
- 0Abstention
- 3Did not vote
- 46For
- 18Against
- 4Abstention
- 7Did not vote
- 3For
- 65Against
- 2Abstention
- 9Did not vote
- 0For
- 22Against
- 2Abstention
- 3Did not vote
- 0For
- 79Against
- 0Abstention
- 6Did not vote
Members
Showing 10 of 719
| Name | Country | Group | Vote Position |
|---|---|---|---|
For | |||
For | |||
For | |||
For | |||
For | |||
For | |||
For | |||
For | |||
For | |||
For |