ENVote in the European Parliament
Implementation of the rule of law conditionality regime
Jean-Marc Germain, Monika Hohlmeier – After § 9 – Am 9
Date: 18.12.2025Reference: A10-0240/2025infringement of EU lawfinancial managementfinancial transparencyfund (EU)rule of lawEU Member Stateinstitutional cooperationinstitutional balance (EU)democracyEU budgetsuspension of paymentsconditionality mechanism
Overall Result
Rejected- 184 For
- 392 Against
- 2 Abstention
- 141 Did not vote
How we count
- Yes, No and Abstention come from the European Parliament's roll-call voting protocol.
- “Did not vote” is derived: MEPs with a mandate on the voting day for whom no vote was recorded. Abstentions do not count towards this.
- Subsequent vote corrections are shown but do not change the official result.
- Each vote (overall vote, amendment, partial vote) counts separately. Therefore totals may differ from pages that count differently.
Status and procedure
Outcome as recorded by the European Parliament.
- Vote held on
- Latest recorded step
- Plenary · (353 days ago)
- Next scheduled step
- No further step is scheduled in the source.
Procedure timeline
2025/2061(INI) · INI
Recorded procedure activities. These do not establish whether a law has entered into force.
- Recorded: Referral
- Recorded: Committee stage
- Latest recorded: Plenary
Recorded activities (12)
- Referral to committee
- Committee report tabled
- Committee opinion tabled
- Committee amendments tabled
- Committee opinion adopted
- Committee report adopted
- Tabling for plenary
- Tabling for plenary
- Tabling for plenary
- Plenary debate
- Plenary vote
- Plenary vote results
Scheduled activities (not confirmation of completion)
- Plenary debate
- Plenary vote
Procedure file (OEIL) · European Parliament data
Retrieved:
Sources
Data: EP Open Data API
What is this about?
- The conditionality mechanism aims to protect the EU budget from risks linked to breaches of the rule of law by imposing financial measures when budgetary soundness is threatened.
- Its objective is to ensure compliance with core EU values such as democracy and human rights while maintaining public trust in the Union.
- So far, the regulation has primarily been applied in Hungary, with limited enforcement in other member states.
- Political delays and a lack of transparency in its application have undermined the tool’s credibility.
- Future implementation must be more consistent and free from political interference to enhance its effectiveness.
Vote by political group
How the political groups voted
Non-attached Members (NI)For16
- 16For
- 8Against
- 0Abstention
- 6Did not vote
European Conservatives and Reformists (ECR)For64
- 64For
- 4Against
- 0Abstention
- 11Did not vote
Europe of Sovereign Nations (ESN)For23
- 23For
- 0Against
- 0Abstention
- 4Did not vote
Patriots for Europe (PfE)For76
- 76For
- 0Against
- 0Abstention
- 9Did not vote
European People's Party (EPP)For5
- 5For
- 138Against
- 2Abstention
- 43Did not vote
Renew Europe (Renew)For0
- 0For
- 58Against
- 0Abstention
- 17Did not vote
Progressive Alliance of Socialists and Democrats (S&D)For0
- 0For
- 103Against
- 0Abstention
- 33Did not vote
The Left in the European Parliament (GUE/NGL)For0
- 0For
- 38Against
- 0Abstention
- 8Did not vote
Greens/European Free Alliance (Greens/EFA)For0
- 0For
- 43Against
- 0Abstention
- 10Did not vote
Members
Showing 10 of 719
| Name | Country | Group | Vote Position |
|---|---|---|---|
 Greece | NI | For | |
 Italy | ECR | For | |
 Germany | ESN | For | |
 Czechia | NI | For | |
 Netherlands | PfE | For | |
 Spain | PfE | For | |
 Poland | ECR | For | |
 Lithuania | ESN | For | |
| Poland | ECR | For | |
 France | PfE | For |
