Vote in the European Parliament
Decarbonisation and modernisation of EU fisheries, and the development and deployment of fishing gear
Overall Result
Adopted- 450 For
- 93 Against
- 37 Abstention
- 139 Did not vote
How we count
- Yes, No and Abstention come from the European Parliament's roll-call voting protocol.
- “Did not vote” is derived: MEPs with a mandate on the voting day for whom no vote was recorded. Abstentions do not count towards this.
- Subsequent vote corrections are shown but do not change the official result.
- Each vote (overall vote, amendment, partial vote) counts separately. Therefore totals may differ from pages that count differently.
Status and procedure
Outcome as recorded by the European Parliament.
- Vote held on
- Latest recorded step
- Plenary · (358 days ago)
- Next scheduled step
- No further step is scheduled in the source.
Procedure timeline
2024/2123(INI) · INI
Recorded procedure activities. These do not establish whether a law has entered into force.
- Recorded: Referral
- Recorded: Committee stage
- Latest recorded: Plenary
Recorded activities (8)
- Referral to committee
- Committee report tabled
- Committee amendments tabled
- Committee report adopted
- Tabling for plenary
- Tabling for plenary
- Plenary vote
- Plenary vote results
Scheduled activities (not confirmation of completion)
- Plenary vote
Procedure file (OEIL) · European Parliament data
Retrieved:
Sources
Data: EP Open Data API
What is this about?
- The EU aims to achieve climate-neutral fisheries by 2050 through decarbonization and fleet modernization.
- The focus is on reducing emissions while maintaining economic stability in coastal communities.
- Small-scale fisheries are prioritized for financial and technological support to ease the transition.
- Innovative fishing gear and alternative propulsion systems are promoted to minimize environmental impact.
- The reform seeks to balance social equity and regional diversity for an inclusive transformation.
Amendment history (6)
Wording as published by the EP, in English.
- Amendment 1Rejected
Paragraph 1
Tabled by Ton Diepeveen, Rachel Blom, Nikola Bartůšek +75 · Members
1. Stresses
Removed: that achieving climate neutrality by 2050, in line with the European Green Deal objectives, EU legislation and the UN Paris Agreement, requiresAdded: that, given the EU fishing fleet accounts for only 0.015 % of global carbon emissions and has already reduced its emissions by more than 52 % since 1990, any transition of the sector must be part of a structured, inclusive and just transition across all EU fisheries and aquaculture … - Amendment 3Rejected
Paragraph 8
Tabled by Ton Diepeveen, Rachel Blom, Nikola Bartůšek +76 · Members
… the CFP and the EMFAF severely restricts the possibilities for public support, Added: including through restrictive EMFAF eligibility criteria such as the 24 metre vessel-length threshold and the 40-year vessel age limit, which is also deterring private investment in vessel renewal, preventing the necessary …
- Amendment 4Rejected
Paragraph 42
Tabled by Ton Diepeveen, Rachel Blom, Nikola Bartůšek +76 · Members
42. Underlines its view that
Removed: generational renewal can go hand in hand with the objectives of the European Green Deal and the need to ensure a digital transition within the blue economy;Added: excessive regulatory pressure and administrative burdens discourage generational renewal in the fisheries sector and must be reduced to make the profession more attractive; notes that this requires not only attracting young people to the fishing … - Amendment 5Rejected
Paragraph 46
Tabled by Ton Diepeveen, Rachel Blom, Nikola Bartůšek +76 · Members
46. Emphasises the need to
Removed: carry out energy audits on fishing vessels viaAdded: make voluntary energy-efficiency advice available to operators under the EMFAF; insists that optimisation and retrofitting operations must be encouraged wherever … energy efficiency of vessels and promote the use of technologies, in particularRemoved: AI, to optimise fishing routes, so as to decarbonise fishing in a more affordable way;Added: AI; - Amendment 6Rejected
Paragraph 61
Tabled by Ton Diepeveen, Rachel Blom, Nikola Bartůšek +76 · Members
… the sector need to be further facilitated in a more time efficient
Removed: wayAdded: way, including through a fast-track procedure for the approval and deployment of innovative fishing gear and guided by technology neutrality and robust scientific evidence, including all aspects … funding eligibility and regulatory flexibility to be based on the best availableRemoved: science, aligned with all relevant policies and regulationsAdded: science and to contribute to all three pillars of sustainability; - Amendment 7Rejected
Paragraph 77 a (new)
Tabled by Ton Diepeveen, Rachel Blom, Nikola Bartůšek +76 · Members
Added: 77a. Stresses that fisheries and aquaculture, as essential food-producing sectors, must be prioritised in maritime spatial planning; warns that the rapid expansion of offshore energy production and other industrial activities are already displacing fishing activities and restricting access to the most productive coastal waters; calls for maritime spatial planning frameworks that guarantee long-term and secure access to maritime space for fisheries and aquaculture;
Vote by political group
How the political groups voted
- 7For
- 10Against
- 8Abstention
- 5Did not vote
- 150For
- 1Against
- 0Abstention
- 37Did not vote
- 89For
- 5Against
- 4Abstention
- 38Did not vote
- 74For
- 0Against
- 2Abstention
- 9Did not vote
- 44For
- 8Against
- 15Abstention
- 12Did not vote
- 2For
- 40Against
- 0Abstention
- 11Did not vote
- 58For
- 0Against
- 2Abstention
- 15Did not vote
- 20For
- 0Against
- 4Abstention
- 3Did not vote
- 6For
- 29Against
- 2Abstention
- 9Did not vote
Members
Showing 10 of 719
| Name | Country | Group | Vote Position |
|---|---|---|---|
For | |||
For | |||
For | |||
For | |||
For | |||
For | |||
For | |||
For | |||
For | |||
For |