Vote in the European Parliament

Decarbonisation and modernisation of EU fisheries, and the development and deployment of fishing gear

Ton Diepeveen – Motion for a resolution (as a whole)
Date: 18.12.2025·Reference: A10-0236/2025
Rapporteur: Ton Diepeveen

Overall Result

Adopted
  • 450 For
  • 93 Against
  • 37 Abstention
  • 139 Did not vote
Status and procedure

Outcome as recorded by the European Parliament.

Vote held on
Latest recorded step
Plenary · (358 days ago)
Next scheduled step
No further step is scheduled in the source.

Procedure timeline

2024/2123(INI) · INI

Recorded procedure activities. These do not establish whether a law has entered into force.

  1. Recorded: Referral92 days until the next step
  2. Recorded: Committee stage209 days until the next step
  3. Latest recorded: Plenary358 days since this step began
Recorded activities (8)
  1. Referral to committee
  2. Committee report tabled
  3. Committee amendments tabled
  4. Committee report adopted
  5. Tabling for plenary
  6. Tabling for plenary
  7. Plenary vote
  8. Plenary vote results
Scheduled activities (not confirmation of completion)
  1. Plenary vote

Procedure file (OEIL) · European Parliament data
Retrieved:

Sources

Data: EP Open Data API

What is this about?

  • The EU aims to achieve climate-neutral fisheries by 2050 through decarbonization and fleet modernization.
  • The focus is on reducing emissions while maintaining economic stability in coastal communities.
  • Small-scale fisheries are prioritized for financial and technological support to ease the transition.
  • Innovative fishing gear and alternative propulsion systems are promoted to minimize environmental impact.
  • The reform seeks to balance social equity and regional diversity for an inclusive transformation.
Source: Explanatory Statement (AI Generated)

Amendment history (6)

Wording as published by the EP, in English.

  1. Amendment 1Rejected

    Paragraph 1

    Tabled by Ton Diepeveen, Rachel Blom, Nikola Bartůšek +75 · Members

    1. Stresses Removed: that achieving climate neutrality by 2050, in line with the European Green Deal objectives, EU legislation and the UN Paris Agreement, requires Added: that, given the EU fishing fleet accounts for only 0.015 % of global carbon emissions and has already reduced its emissions by more than 52 % since 1990, any transition of the sector must be part of a structured, inclusive and just transition across all EU fisheries and aquaculture …

  2. Amendment 3Rejected

    Paragraph 8

    Tabled by Ton Diepeveen, Rachel Blom, Nikola Bartůšek +76 · Members

    … the CFP and the EMFAF severely restricts the possibilities for public support, Added: including through restrictive EMFAF eligibility criteria such as the 24 metre vessel-length threshold and the 40-year vessel age limit, which is also deterring private investment in vessel renewal, preventing the necessary …

  3. Amendment 4Rejected

    Paragraph 42

    Tabled by Ton Diepeveen, Rachel Blom, Nikola Bartůšek +76 · Members

    42. Underlines its view that Removed: generational renewal can go hand in hand with the objectives of the European Green Deal and the need to ensure a digital transition within the blue economy; Added: excessive regulatory pressure and administrative burdens discourage generational renewal in the fisheries sector and must be reduced to make the profession more attractive; notes that this requires not only attracting young people to the fishing …

  4. Amendment 5Rejected

    Paragraph 46

    Tabled by Ton Diepeveen, Rachel Blom, Nikola Bartůšek +76 · Members

    46. Emphasises the need to Removed: carry out energy audits on fishing vessels via Added: make voluntary energy-efficiency advice available to operators under the EMFAF; insists that optimisation and retrofitting operations must be encouraged wherever … energy efficiency of vessels and promote the use of technologies, in particular Removed: AI, to optimise fishing routes, so as to decarbonise fishing in a more affordable way; Added: AI;

  5. Amendment 6Rejected

    Paragraph 61

    Tabled by Ton Diepeveen, Rachel Blom, Nikola Bartůšek +76 · Members

    … the sector need to be further facilitated in a more time efficient Removed: way Added: way, including through a fast-track procedure for the approval and deployment of innovative fishing gear and guided by technology neutrality and robust scientific evidence, including all aspects … funding eligibility and regulatory flexibility to be based on the best available Removed: science, aligned with all relevant policies and regulations Added: science and to contribute to all three pillars of sustainability;

  6. Amendment 7Rejected

    Paragraph 77 a (new)

    Tabled by Ton Diepeveen, Rachel Blom, Nikola Bartůšek +76 · Members

    Added: 77a. Stresses that fisheries and aquaculture, as essential food-producing sectors, must be prioritised in maritime spatial planning; warns that the rapid expansion of offshore energy production and other industrial activities are already displacing fishing activities and restricting access to the most productive coastal waters; calls for maritime spatial planning frameworks that guarantee long-term and secure access to maritime space for fisheries and aquaculture;

Vote by political group

How the political groups voted

Members

Showing 10 of 719

Vote Position
NameCountryGroupVote Position
BulgariaEPP
For
GermanyS&D
For
SpainEPP
For
CzechiaPfE
For
GermanyS&D
For
ItalyECR
For
NetherlandsPfE
For
ItalyEPP
For
FinlandEPP
For
PolandEPP
For
Show more
Follow us on Instagram@checksomevotes@checksomevotes_en