EN
ItalianoVote in the European Parliament
REPORT on military mobility
Petras Auštrevičius, Roberts Zīle – Motion for a resolution
Date: 17.12.2025Reference: A10-0242/2025military cooperationmilitary equipmentmilitary personneltransport infrastructuredual-use technologyfund (EU)EU-NATO cooperationcommon security and defence policydual-use goodtransport networktrans-European networkEuropean defence policy
Overall Result
Adopted- 493 For
- 127 Against
- 38 Abstention
- 61 Did not vote
How we count
- Yes, No and Abstention come from the European Parliament's roll-call voting protocol.
- “Did not vote” is derived: MEPs with a mandate on the voting day for whom no vote was recorded. Abstentions do not count towards this.
- Subsequent vote corrections are shown but do not change the official result.
- Each vote (overall vote, amendment, partial vote) counts separately. Therefore totals may differ from pages that count differently.
Status and procedure
Outcome as recorded by the European Parliament.
- Vote held on
- Latest recorded step
- Plenary · (352 days ago)
- Next scheduled step
- No further step is scheduled in the source.
Procedure timeline
2025/2090(INI) · INI
Recorded procedure activities. These do not establish whether a law has entered into force.
- Recorded: Referral
- Recorded: Committee stage
- Latest recorded: Plenary
Recorded activities (9)
- Referral to committee
- Committee report tabled
- Committee amendments tabled
- Committee amendments tabled
- Committee report adopted
- Tabling for plenary
- Plenary debate
- Plenary vote
- Plenary vote results
Scheduled activities (not confirmation of completion)
- Plenary debate
- Plenary vote
Procedure file (OEIL) · European Parliament data
Retrieved:
Sources
Data: EP Open Data API
What is this about?
- The EU aims to enhance military mobility to respond more swiftly to geopolitical threats such as Russia’s war in Ukraine.
- The goal is to establish a 'military Schengen zone' through harmonized procedures and infrastructure standards for cross-border troop movements.
- Four priority corridors will integrate military and civilian uses, with close cooperation sought with NATO.
- Funding will be increased to eliminate bottlenecks in transport infrastructure like railways, roads, and ports.
- Long-term, European defense capabilities are to be strengthened through joint procurement and technological sovereignty.
Vote by political group
How the political groups voted
Non-attached Members (NI)For5
- 5For
- 18Against
- 3Abstention
- 4Did not vote
European Conservatives and Reformists (ECR)For70
- 70For
- 2Against
- 3Abstention
- 4Did not vote
European People's Party (EPP)For173
- 173For
- 0Against
- 0Abstention
- 15Did not vote
Progressive Alliance of Socialists and Democrats (S&D)For121
- 121For
- 1Against
- 3Abstention
- 11Did not vote
Greens/European Free Alliance (Greens/EFA)For41
- 41For
- 3Against
- 4Abstention
- 5Did not vote
Renew Europe (Renew)For66
- 66For
- 0Against
- 2Abstention
- 7Did not vote
Patriots for Europe (PfE)For10
- 10For
- 49Against
- 19Abstention
- 7Did not vote
The Left in the European Parliament (GUE/NGL)For5
- 5For
- 34Against
- 2Abstention
- 5Did not vote
Europe of Sovereign Nations (ESN)For2
- 2For
- 20Against
- 2Abstention
- 3Did not vote
Members
Showing 10 of 719
| Name | Country | Group | Vote Position |
|---|---|---|---|
 Sweden | ECR | For | |
 Spain | EPP | For | |
 France | S&D | For | |
 Croatia | EPP | For | |
| France | S&D | For | |
 Poland | ECR | For | |
 Germany | Greens/EFA | For | |
 Romania | Renew | For | |
| Spain | Renew | For | |
 Czechia | EPP | For |
