EN
DeutschVote in the European Parliament
REPORT on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Regulations (EU) No 1024/2012 and (EU) 2018/1724 as regards certain requirements laid down by Directive (EU) XXXX/XXXX
Adina Vălean – Commission proposal and amendment
Date: 27.11.2025Reference: A10-0209/2025exchange of informationaccess to informationinformation systemsingle marketadministrative formalitiesadministrative cooperationEU Member State
Overall Result
Adopted- 400 For
- 77 Against
- 132 Abstention
- 110 Did not vote
How we count
- Yes, No and Abstention come from the European Parliament's roll-call voting protocol.
- “Did not vote” is derived: MEPs with a mandate on the voting day for whom no vote was recorded. Abstentions do not count towards this.
- Subsequent vote corrections are shown but do not change the official result.
- Each vote (overall vote, amendment, partial vote) counts separately. Therefore totals may differ from pages that count differently.
Status and procedure
Outcome as recorded by the European Parliament.
- Vote held on
- Latest recorded step
- Negotiations · (351 days ago)
- Next scheduled step
- No further step is scheduled in the source.
Procedure timeline
2023/0462(COD) · COD
Recorded procedure activities. These do not establish whether a law has entered into force.
- Recorded: Referral
- Recorded: Committee stage
- Recorded: Plenary
- Latest recorded: Negotiations
Recorded activities (11)
- Referral to committee
- Committee report tabled
- Committee amendments tabled
- Committee report adopted
- Tabling for plenary
- Tabling for plenary
- Plenary debate
- Text amended in plenary
- Referred back to committee for interinstitutional negotiations
- Plenary vote
- Plenary vote results
Scheduled activities (not confirmation of completion)
- Plenary debate
- Plenary vote
Procedure file (OEIL) · European Parliament data
Retrieved:
Sources
Data: EP Open Data API
What is this about?
- The regulation amends existing EU laws to align transparency requirements for lobbying activities on behalf of third countries.
- It seeks to establish consistent disclosure standards across the single market to enhance accountability.
- The focus lies on regulations governing administrative cooperation and digital access to public services.
- Key adjustments aim to eliminate loopholes and improve traceability of external influence.
- The political objective is to bolster trust in EU institutions through greater clarity and oversight.
Vote by political group
How the political groups voted
Non-attached Members (NI)For12
- 12For
- 12Against
- 2Abstention
- 4Did not vote
Progressive Alliance of Socialists and Democrats (S&D)For111
- 111For
- 0Against
- 4Abstention
- 21Did not vote
European Conservatives and Reformists (ECR)For64
- 64For
- 2Against
- 0Abstention
- 13Did not vote
Renew Europe (Renew)For54
- 54For
- 0Against
- 9Abstention
- 12Did not vote
European People's Party (EPP)For156
- 156For
- 0Against
- 0Abstention
- 32Did not vote
Greens/European Free Alliance (Greens/EFA)For3
- 3For
- 0Against
- 47Abstention
- 3Did not vote
Europe of Sovereign Nations (ESN)For0
- 0For
- 19Against
- 2Abstention
- 6Did not vote
The Left in the European Parliament (GUE/NGL)For0
- 0For
- 33Against
- 4Abstention
- 9Did not vote
Patriots for Europe (PfE)For0
- 0For
- 11Against
- 64Abstention
- 10Did not vote
Members
Showing 10 of 719
| Name | Country | Group | Vote Position |
|---|---|---|---|
 Spain | S&D | For | |
 Romania | ECR | For | |
 France | Renew | For | |
 Italy | EPP | For | |
| France | S&D | For | |
 Slovenia | S&D | For | |
 Sweden | EPP | For | |
 Poland | ECR | For | |
 Portugal | EPP | For | |
 Slovakia | NI | For |
