Vote in the European Parliament

Draft amending budget no 3 to the general budget 2025 - Adjustment in payment appropriations, update of revenues and other technical updates

Victor Negrescu – § 8 – Am 3
Date: 26.11.2025·Reference: A10-0237/2025
Rapporteur: Victor Negrescu

Overall Result

Rejected
  • 161 For
  • 463 Against
  • 34 Abstention
  • 61 Did not vote
Amendment— You are viewing a sub-vote (amendment) of the main vote.Amendment 3 · Tabled by PfEView amendment at the EP ↗
Amendment wording

Tabled by Julien Sanchez, Auke Zijlstra

8. Takes note of the Removed: adjustments of the Union contribution to Added: proposed adjustments to the Union’s contribution to the various decentralised agencies; Removed: considers these adjustments mostly technical in nature; welcomes them in as far as they optimise the use of resources under the operational lines, such as LIFE, AMIF or the Single Market Programme; regrets, however, that the underlying reason for ‘returning’ commitment and payment appropriations from the respective agency lines to the related programme lines is a delay in the recruitment of staff or a delay in the roll-out of new policy and legislative initiatives such as Retail Investment Strategy (which concerns ESMA and EIOPA), the Asylum and Migration Pact (which concerns the EUAA), the maritime safety package (which concerns EMSA) or the proposal on new genomic techniques (which concerns EFSA); Added: stresses that these adjustments, presented as purely technical, in fact reveal a lack of budgetary discipline and a questionable political orientation; underlines that the transfer of EUR 48 million in commitments and EUR 45 million in payments from the European Union Agency for Asylum (EUAA) to the Asylum, Migration and Integration Fund (AMIF), officially intended to support the preparation of the implementation of the Pact on Migration and Asylum, exemplifies a costly, bureaucratic and ineffective model of migration governance, even though the mid-term revision of the Multiannual Financial Framework has already allocated an additional EUR 2 billion to this same Pact for the period 2025–2027; notes that, despite these successive budgetary increases, illegal arrivals continue to rise across the Union and the number of effective returns remains marginal; therefore considers that there is no tangible indicator demonstrating the effectiveness of AMIF and that any reinforcement of AMIF funding is unjustified;

Wording as published by the EP, in English. PE778.984

← Back to Main Vote
Status and procedure

Outcome as recorded by the European Parliament.

Vote held on
Latest recorded step
Official Journal · (291 days ago)
Next scheduled step
No further step is scheduled in the source.
Publication in the Official Journal recorded

Procedure timeline

2025/0319(BUD) · BUD

Recorded procedure activities. These do not establish whether a law has entered into force.

  1. Recorded: Committee stage22 days until the next step
  2. Recorded: Plenary4 days until the next step
  3. Recorded: ReferralNext step on the same day
  4. Recorded: Plenary63 days until the next step
  5. Latest recorded: Official Journal
Recorded activities (9)
  1. Committee report tabled
  2. Committee amendments tabled
  3. Committee report adopted
  4. Tabling for plenary
  5. Referral to committee
  6. Tabling for plenary
  7. Plenary vote
  8. Plenary vote results
  9. Publication in the Official Journal
Scheduled activities (not confirmation of completion)
  1. Plenary vote

Procedure file (OEIL) · European Parliament data
Retrieved:

Sources

Data: EP Open Data API

What is this about?

  • The Draft Amending Budget No. 3/2025 adjusts EU payment appropriations and updates revenue estimates for 2025.
  • It prioritizes funding for the European Regional Development Fund and the Common Agricultural Policy to accelerate program implementation and ensure food security.
  • Additional resources are allocated to the Strategic Technologies for Europe Platform (STEP) and sustainable fisheries partnerships.
  • Revenue from fines and customs duties offsets increased payment needs, minimizing member state contributions.
  • Delays in instruments like the Ukraine Facility and customs control equipment are noted as concerns.
Source: Explanatory Statement (AI Generated)

Vote by political group

How the political groups voted

Members

Showing 10 of 719

Vote Position
NameCountryGroupVote Position
ItalyECR
For
GermanyESN
For
HungaryPfE
For
AustriaPfE
For
AustriaPfE
For
FrancePfE
For
ItalyPfE
For
CzechiaNI
For
FrancePfE
For
SpainPfE
For
Show more
Follow us on Instagram@checksomevotes@checksomevotes_en