EN
FrançaisVote in the European Parliament
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the Commission delegated regulation of 16 October 2025 amending Delegated Regulation (EU) 2023/2429 as regards origin labelling for fruit and vegetables originating in the non-self-governing territory of Western Sahara
Motion for a resolution (as a whole)
Date: 26.11.2025Reference: B10-0506/2025fresh vegetableWestern Saharafresh fruitoriginating productconsumer informationimport (EU)marketing standardlabellingMorocco
Overall Result
Rejected- 359 For
- 188 Against
- 76 Abstention
- 96 Did not vote
How we count
- Yes, No and Abstention come from the European Parliament's roll-call voting protocol.
- “Did not vote” is derived: MEPs with a mandate on the voting day for whom no vote was recorded. Abstentions do not count towards this.
- Subsequent vote corrections are shown but do not change the official result.
- Each vote (overall vote, amendment, partial vote) counts separately. Therefore totals may differ from pages that count differently.
Status and procedure
Outcome as recorded by the European Parliament.
- Vote held on
- Latest recorded step
- Plenary · (357 days ago)
- Next scheduled step
- No further step is scheduled in the source.
Procedure timeline
2025/2943(DEA) · DEA
Recorded procedure activities. These do not establish whether a law has entered into force.
- Recorded: Referral
- Latest recorded: Plenary
Recorded activities (6)
- Referral to committee
- Tabling for plenary
- Tabling for plenary
- Tabling for plenary
- Plenary vote
- Plenary vote results
Scheduled activities (not confirmation of completion)
- Plenary vote
Procedure file (OEIL) · European Parliament data
Retrieved:
Sources
Data: EP Open Data API
What is this about?
- The amendment to the delegated regulation addresses the origin labeling of fruit and vegetables from Western Sahara.
- It aims to enforce the legal distinction between Western Sahara and Morocco as ruled by the EU Court of Justice.
- The current proposal allows ambiguous labeling, potentially misleading consumers.
- This conflicts with EU food information regulations and undermines market transparency.
- The resolution opposes the regulation to ensure legal certainty and fair trade practices.
Vote by political group
How the political groups voted
Non-attached Members (NI)For17
- 17For
- 4Against
- 5Abstention
- 4Did not vote
Greens/European Free Alliance (Greens/EFA)For49
- 49For
- 0Against
- 0Abstention
- 4Did not vote
The Left in the European Parliament (GUE/NGL)For31
- 31For
- 0Against
- 0Abstention
- 15Did not vote
European People's Party (EPP)For65
- 65For
- 67Against
- 38Abstention
- 18Did not vote
Europe of Sovereign Nations (ESN)For4
- 4For
- 12Against
- 5Abstention
- 6Did not vote
European Conservatives and Reformists (ECR)For61
- 61For
- 10Against
- 0Abstention
- 8Did not vote
Progressive Alliance of Socialists and Democrats (S&D)For89
- 89For
- 11Against
- 10Abstention
- 26Did not vote
Renew Europe (Renew)For30
- 30For
- 28Against
- 9Abstention
- 8Did not vote
Patriots for Europe (PfE)For13
- 13For
- 56Against
- 9Abstention
- 7Did not vote
Members
Showing 10 of 719
| Name | Country | Group | Vote Position |
|---|---|---|---|
 Spain | Greens/EFA | For | |
 Italy | GUE/NGL | For | |
 Slovenia | EPP | For | |
 Hungary | EPP | For | |
 Germany | ESN | For | |
 Poland | ECR | For | |
 Austria | S&D | For | |
| Italy | GUE/NGL | For | |
 Luxembourg | NI | For | |
| Poland | ECR | For |
