Vote in the European Parliament
Recommendation for the Council, the Commission and the Vice-President of the Commission / High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy on the EU’s diplomatic strategy and geopolitical cooperation in the Arctic
Overall Result
Adopted- 510 For
- 75 Against
- 80 Abstention
- 54 Did not vote
How we count
- Yes, No and Abstention come from the European Parliament's roll-call voting protocol.
- “Did not vote” is derived: MEPs with a mandate on the voting day for whom no vote was recorded. Abstentions do not count towards this.
- Subsequent vote corrections are shown but do not change the official result.
- Each vote (overall vote, amendment, partial vote) counts separately. Therefore totals may differ from pages that count differently.
Status and procedure
Outcome as recorded by the European Parliament.
- Vote held on
- Latest recorded step
- Plenary · (366 days ago)
- Next scheduled step
- No further step is scheduled in the source.
Procedure timeline
2025/2116(INI) · INI
Recorded procedure activities. These do not establish whether a law has entered into force.
- Recorded: Referral
- Recorded: Committee stage
- Latest recorded: Plenary
Recorded activities (9)
- Referral to committee
- Committee report tabled
- Committee amendments tabled
- Committee report adopted
- Tabling for plenary
- Tabling for plenary
- Plenary debate
- Plenary vote
- Plenary vote results
Scheduled activities (not confirmation of completion)
- Plenary debate
- Plenary vote
Procedure file (OEIL) · European Parliament data
Retrieved:
Sources
Data: EP Open Data API
What is this about?
- The EU aims to enhance its diplomatic and geopolitical engagement in the Arctic to ensure regional stability and sustainable development.
- In response to increasing militarization by Russia and China’s growing influence, cooperation with NATO allies will be strengthened to counter hybrid threats.
- Climate protection and the preservation of fragile ecosystems are central, with a focus on including indigenous communities and their traditional knowledge.
- The EU seeks to safeguard critical infrastructure like undersea cables and enforce international law, particularly the UN Convention on the Law of the Sea.
- Strategic partnerships with Arctic states will secure resource supplies and boost the region’s economic resilience.
Amendment history (2)
Wording as published by the EP, in English.
- Amendment 3Rejected
Paragraph 1 – point e a (new)
Tabled by Sarah Knafo · ESN
Added: ea) affirm that Arctic security must rely on the Member States’ own capabilities for surveillance, protection of critical infrastructure and crisis management, to ensure that the EU does not depend exclusively on NATO or external actors to guarantee the stability of the region;
- Amendment 4Rejected
Paragraph 1 – point o a (new)
Tabled by Sarah Knafo · ESN
Added: oa) recall that primary competence for the exploitation of natural, energy and mineral resources in the Arctic lies with the sovereign Member States concerned; underline that EU initiatives must fully respect the economic, energy and industrial choices of the Member States and their Arctic partners, and should not impose disproportionate constraints that go beyond the requirements of international law;
Vote by political group
How the political groups voted
- 6For
- 19Against
- 2Abstention
- 3Did not vote
- 126For
- 0Against
- 0Abstention
- 10Did not vote
- 67For
- 0Against
- 0Abstention
- 8Did not vote
- 177For
- 0Against
- 0Abstention
- 11Did not vote
- 8For
- 25Against
- 48Abstention
- 4Did not vote
- 52For
- 0Against
- 0Abstention
- 1Did not vote
- 67For
- 2Against
- 5Abstention
- 5Did not vote
- 7For
- 8Against
- 24Abstention
- 7Did not vote
- 0For
- 21Against
- 1Abstention
- 5Did not vote
Members
Showing 10 of 719
| Name | Country | Group | Vote Position |
|---|---|---|---|
For | |||
For | |||
For | |||
For | |||
For | |||
For | |||
For | |||
For | |||
For | |||
For |