EN
EspañolVote in the European Parliament
Institutional aspects of the Report on the future of European Competitiveness (Draghi Report)
Brando Benifei – Recital M/1
Date: 25.11.2025Reference: A10-0196/2025defence budgeteconomic growthsingle marketdigital transformationinstitutional reformEU energy policydigital single marketartificial intelligencegovernancecompetitivenessclean technologyEU growth strategyscientific educationinnovationinvestment
Overall Result
Adopted- 551 For
- 58 Against
- 39 Abstention
- 71 Did not vote
How we count
- Yes, No and Abstention come from the European Parliament's roll-call voting protocol.
- “Did not vote” is derived: MEPs with a mandate on the voting day for whom no vote was recorded. Abstentions do not count towards this.
- Subsequent vote corrections are shown but do not change the official result.
- Each vote (overall vote, amendment, partial vote) counts separately. Therefore totals may differ from pages that count differently.
Status and procedure
Outcome as recorded by the European Parliament.
- Vote held on
- Latest recorded step
- Plenary · (392 days ago)
- Next scheduled step
- No further step is scheduled in the source.
Procedure timeline
2025/2013(INI) · INI
Recorded procedure activities. These do not establish whether a law has entered into force.
- Recorded: Referral
- Recorded: Committee stage
- Latest recorded: Plenary
Recorded activities (8)
- Referral to committee
- Committee report tabled
- Committee amendments tabled
- Committee report adopted
- Tabling for plenary
- Tabling for plenary
- Plenary vote
- Plenary vote results
Scheduled activities (not confirmation of completion)
- Plenary vote
Procedure file (OEIL) · European Parliament data
Retrieved:
Sources
Data: EP Open Data API
What is this about?
- The report examines institutional reforms to enhance Europe’s competitiveness, drawing on the Draghi Report’s recommendations.
- Key objectives include completing the single market, boosting investments in innovation and sustainability, and strengthening strategic autonomy.
- Political deadlocks are to be addressed through more efficient decision-making processes, such as qualified majority voting.
- The EU budget is also targeted for reform to enable focused investments in critical areas like defense and digitalization.
- The proposals aim to ensure the EU’s ability to act effectively in an increasingly competitive global environment.
Vote by political group
How the political groups voted
Non-attached Members (NI)For7
- 7For
- 9Against
- 13Abstention
- 1Did not vote
Progressive Alliance of Socialists and Democrats (S&D)For118
- 118For
- 1Against
- 3Abstention
- 14Did not vote
European People's Party (EPP)For163
- 163For
- 4Against
- 2Abstention
- 19Did not vote
European Conservatives and Reformists (ECR)For64
- 64For
- 3Against
- 6Abstention
- 6Did not vote
Patriots for Europe (PfE)For35
- 35For
- 37Against
- 6Abstention
- 7Did not vote
Greens/European Free Alliance (Greens/EFA)For50
- 50For
- 0Against
- 0Abstention
- 3Did not vote
The Left in the European Parliament (GUE/NGL)For27
- 27For
- 3Against
- 7Abstention
- 9Did not vote
Renew Europe (Renew)For66
- 66For
- 0Against
- 1Abstention
- 8Did not vote
Europe of Sovereign Nations (ESN)For21
- 21For
- 1Against
- 1Abstention
- 4Did not vote
Members
Showing 10 of 719
| Name | Country | Group | Vote Position |
|---|---|---|---|
 Lithuania | S&D | For | |
 France | EPP | For | |
 Poland | ECR | For | |
 Czechia | PfE | For | |
 Germany | EPP | For | |
 Estonia | S&D | For | |
| Germany | Greens/EFA | For | |
 Belgium | GUE/NGL | For | |
| Belgium | S&D | For | |
 Italy | ECR | For |
