EN
Español
ItalianoVote in the European Parliament
2024 budget – assessing the implementation of the gender mainstreaming methodology in the EU budget
Overall Result
Adopted- 389 For
- 213 Against
- 36 Abstention
- 81 Did not vote
How we count
- Yes, No and Abstention come from the European Parliament's roll-call voting protocol.
- “Did not vote” is derived: MEPs with a mandate on the voting day for whom no vote was recorded. Abstentions do not count towards this.
- Subsequent vote corrections are shown but do not change the official result.
- Each vote (overall vote, amendment, partial vote) counts separately. Therefore totals may differ from pages that count differently.
Status and procedure
Outcome as recorded by the European Parliament.
- Vote held on
- Latest recorded step
- Plenary · (374 days ago)
- Next scheduled step
- No further step is scheduled in the source.
Procedure timeline
2025/2033(INI) · INI
Recorded procedure activities. These do not establish whether a law has entered into force.
- Recorded: Referral
- Recorded: Committee stage
- Latest recorded: Plenary
Recorded activities (9)
- Referral to committee
- Committee report tabled
- Committee amendments tabled
- Committee report adopted
- Tabling for plenary
- Tabling for plenary
- Tabling for plenary
- Plenary vote
- Plenary vote results
Scheduled activities (not confirmation of completion)
- Plenary vote
Procedure file (OEIL) · European Parliament data
Retrieved:
Sources
Data: EP Open Data API
What is this about?
- The EU assesses the integration of gender mainstreaming in the 2024 budget to systematically advance gender equality.
- The goal is to evaluate expenditures based on their contribution to equality and address structural disparities.
- Current methods reveal that only a small portion of funds explicitly supports gender equality.
- Future reforms aim to introduce binding targets for gender-related spending.
- The initiative seeks to enhance transparency and efficiency in fund allocation while preventing intersectional discrimination.
Amendment history (1)
Wording as published by the EP, in English.
- Amendment 4Rejected
Paragraph 4 a (new)
Tabled by Virginie Joron, Nikola Bartůšek, Vilis Krištopans +75 · Members
Added: 4a. Regrets the absence of a cost assessment for the mechanism implementing this policy (including human resources, information systems created for the monitoring of these indicators, etc.), and for the prospects set out in the present report, which prevents an evaluation of the actual conditions for its deployment; recalls in particular that, in the context of the growing precariousness faced by Europeans, taxpayers’ money must be used with exemplary responsibility and efficiency and should not be allocated to ideological programmes;
Vote by political group
How the political groups voted
Non-attached Members (NI)- 6For
- 14Against
- 9Abstention
- 1Did not vote
Renew Europe (Renew)- 59For
- 2Against
- 6Abstention
- 8Did not vote
Greens/European Free Alliance (Greens/EFA)- 49For
- 0Against
- 0Abstention
- 4Did not vote
Progressive Alliance of Socialists and Democrats (S&D)- 121For
- 0Against
- 0Abstention
- 15Did not vote
European People's Party (EPP)- 118For
- 33Against
- 10Abstention
- 27Did not vote
The Left in the European Parliament (GUE/NGL)- 36For
- 0Against
- 1Abstention
- 9Did not vote
European Conservatives and Reformists (ECR)- 0For
- 72Against
- 0Abstention
- 7Did not vote
Patriots for Europe (PfE)- 0For
- 69Against
- 10Abstention
- 6Did not vote
Europe of Sovereign Nations (ESN)- 0For
- 23Against
- 0Abstention
- 4Did not vote
Members
Showing 10 of 719
| Name | Country | Group | Vote Position |
|---|---|---|---|
 Ireland | Renew | For | |
 Lithuania | Greens/EFA | For | |
 Sweden | S&D | For | |
 Finland | EPP | For | |
 France | Renew | For | |
 Slovenia | EPP | For | |
 Czechia | EPP | For | |
 Belgium | EPP | For | |
| Sweden | EPP | For | |
 Germany | S&D | For |
