Vote in the European Parliament

Amending Directives 2006/43/EC, 2013/34/EU, (EU) 2022/2464 and (EU) 2024/1760 as regards certain corporate sustainability reporting and due diligence requirements

Jörgen Warborn – Recital 24 – Am 286
Date: 13.11.2025·Reference: A10-0197/2025
Rapporteur: Jörgen Warborn

Overall Result

Rejected
  • 294 For
  • 337 Against
  • 9 Abstention
  • 78 Did not vote
Amendment— You are viewing a sub-vote (amendment) of the main vote.Amendment 286 · Amendments to the recitals · Tabled by ECRView amendment at the EP ↗
Amendment wording

Tabled by Tobiasz Bocheński, Kosma Złotowski, Mario Mantovani, Carlo Fidanza, Beatrice Timgren, Ondřej Krutílek, Veronika Vrecionová, Georgiana Teodorescu, Stefano Cavedagna, Chiara Gemma, Marion Maréchal, Mariateresa Vivaldini, Laurence Trochu, Nicolas Bay, Alexandr Vondra, Guillaume Peltier, Jadwiga Wiśniewska, Mariusz Kamiński, Dominik Tarczyński, Joachim Stanisław Brudziński, Daniel Obajtek, Małgorzata Gosiewska, Alessandro Ciriani

… make stakeholder engagement more proportionate, companies should only have to engage with Removed: workers, their representatives Added: their employees, the employees of their subsidiaries and of their business partners, the representatives of those employees including trade unions, and individuals and communities whose rights or interests are or could be directly affected by the Added: adverse impacts on human rights and the environment that stem from the products, services and operations of the company, its subsidiaries and its business Removed: partners, and that have a link to the specific stage of the due diligence process being carried out. Added: partners. That includes individuals or communities in the neighbourhood of plants operated by …

Wording as published by the EP, in English. PE778.802

← Back to Main Vote
Status and procedure

Outcome as recorded by the European Parliament.

Vote held on
Latest recorded step
Official Journal · (260 days ago)
Next scheduled step
No further step is scheduled in the source.
Publication in the Official Journal recorded

Procedure timeline

2025/0045(COD) · COD

Recorded procedure activities. These do not establish whether a law has entered into force.

  1. Recorded: Referral44 days until the next step
  2. Recorded: Committee stage156 days until the next step
  3. Recorded: Plenary5 days until the next step
  4. Recorded: Other activity13 days until the next step
  5. Recorded: Plenary9 days until the next step
  6. Recorded: Negotiations28 days until the next step
  7. Recorded: Committee stageNext step on the same day
  8. Recorded: Plenary75 days until the next step
  9. Recorded: Signature2 days until the next step
  10. Latest recorded: Official Journal
Recorded activities (96)
  1. Referral to committee
  2. Committee opinion tabled
  3. Committee opinion tabled
  4. Committee report tabled
  5. Committee amendments tabled
  6. Committee amendments tabled
  7. Committee amendments tabled
  8. Committee amendments tabled
  9. Committee opinion adopted
  10. Committee opinion adopted
  11. Committee opinion adopted
  12. Committee opinion adopted
  13. Committee opinion adopted
  14. Committee report adopted
  15. Tabling for plenary
  16. Other recorded activity
  17. Plenary vote
  18. Tabling for plenary
  19. Tabling for plenary
  20. Tabling for plenary
  21. Tabling for plenary
  22. Tabling for plenary
  23. Tabling for plenary
  24. Tabling for plenary
  25. Tabling for plenary
  26. Tabling for plenary
  27. Tabling for plenary
  28. Tabling for plenary
  29. Tabling for plenary
  30. Tabling for plenary
  31. Tabling for plenary
  32. Tabling for plenary
  33. Tabling for plenary
  34. Tabling for plenary
  35. Tabling for plenary
  36. Tabling for plenary
  37. Tabling for plenary
  38. Tabling for plenary
  39. Tabling for plenary
  40. Tabling for plenary
  41. Tabling for plenary
  42. Tabling for plenary
  43. Tabling for plenary
  44. Tabling for plenary
  45. Tabling for plenary
  46. Tabling for plenary
  47. Tabling for plenary
  48. Tabling for plenary
  49. Tabling for plenary
  50. Tabling for plenary
  51. Tabling for plenary
  52. Tabling for plenary
  53. Tabling for plenary
  54. Tabling for plenary
  55. Tabling for plenary
  56. Tabling for plenary
  57. Tabling for plenary
  58. Tabling for plenary
  59. Tabling for plenary
  60. Tabling for plenary
  61. Tabling for plenary
  62. Tabling for plenary
  63. Tabling for plenary
  64. Tabling for plenary
  65. Tabling for plenary
  66. Tabling for plenary
  67. Tabling for plenary
  68. Tabling for plenary
  69. Tabling for plenary
  70. Tabling for plenary
  71. Tabling for plenary
  72. Tabling for plenary
  73. Tabling for plenary
  74. Tabling for plenary
  75. Tabling for plenary
  76. Tabling for plenary
  77. Tabling for plenary
  78. Tabling for plenary
  79. Text amended in plenary
  80. Referred back to committee for interinstitutional negotiations
  81. Plenary vote
  82. Plenary vote results
  83. Interinstitutional negotiations
  84. Interinstitutional negotiations
  85. Provisional agreement approved in committee
  86. Tabling for plenary
  87. Tabling for plenary
  88. Tabling for plenary
  89. Tabling for plenary
  90. Tabling for plenary
  91. Tabling for plenary
  92. Parliament’s first-reading position
  93. Plenary vote
  94. Plenary vote results
  95. Signature
  96. Publication in the Official Journal
Scheduled activities (not confirmation of completion)
  1. Plenary vote
  2. Plenary vote

Procedure file (OEIL) · European Parliament data
Retrieved:

Sources

Data: EP Open Data API

What is this about?

  • This directive seeks to streamline corporate sustainability reporting and due diligence obligations while reducing administrative burdens for businesses in the EU.
  • The scope is narrowed to large companies with over 1,000 employees and €450 million in revenue to limit compliance costs.
  • More flexible audit standards and voluntary reporting frameworks are introduced to support implementation.
  • Due diligence requirements are focused on direct business partners to ease corporate responsibilities.
  • The political goal is to balance transparency, competitiveness, and feasibility in sustainability regulations.
Source: Explanatory Statement (AI Generated)

Vote by political group

How the political groups voted

Members

Showing 10 of 718

Vote Position
NameCountryGroupVote Position
ItalyECR
For
GermanyEPP
For
BulgariaESN
For
SloveniaEPP
For
SpainEPP
For
ItalyPfE
For
CyprusNI
For
GermanyESN
For
GermanyRenew
For
FranceECR
For
Show more
Follow us on Instagram@checksomevotes@checksomevotes_en