EN
EspañolVote in the European Parliament
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION seeking an opinion from the Court of Justice on the compatibility with the Treaties of the proposed Agreement on Digital Trade between the European Union and the Republic of Singapore
Motion for a resolution
Date: 13.11.2025Reference: B10-0479/2025digital contentelectronic commerceratification of an agreementconsumer protectiondigital single marketcross-frontier data flowSingaporedigital economytrade agreement (EU)
Overall Result
Rejected- 136 For
- 432 Against
- 71 Abstention
- 79 Did not vote
How we count
- Yes, No and Abstention come from the European Parliament's roll-call voting protocol.
- “Did not vote” is derived: MEPs with a mandate on the voting day for whom no vote was recorded. Abstentions do not count towards this.
- Subsequent vote corrections are shown but do not change the official result.
- Each vote (overall vote, amendment, partial vote) counts separately. Therefore totals may differ from pages that count differently.
Status and procedure
Outcome as recorded by the European Parliament.
- Vote held on
- Latest recorded step
- Plenary · (365 days ago)
- Next scheduled step
- No further step is scheduled in the source.
Procedure timeline
2025/2967(RSP) · RSP
Recorded procedure activities. These do not establish whether a law has entered into force.
- Latest recorded: Plenary
Recorded activities (2)
- Plenary vote
- Plenary vote results
Scheduled activities (not confirmation of completion)
- Plenary vote
Procedure file (OEIL) · European Parliament data
Retrieved:
Sources
Data: EP Open Data API
What is this about?
- The proposed digital trade agreement between the EU and Singapore aims to enhance legal certainty and consumer protection in the digital market.
- Concerns arise regarding its compatibility with EU fundamental rights, particularly data protection and privacy, as the agreement’s safeguards are narrower than those in the EU Charter.
- The lack of a clear definition for 'source code' could restrict regulatory measures on AI and algorithms, potentially conflicting with EU digital laws.
- Without an adequacy decision for Singapore under the GDPR, cross-border data transfers remain contentious.
- The Parliament seeks a Court of Justice opinion to assess the agreement’s compliance with EU treaties.
Vote by political group
How the political groups voted
Non-attached Members (NI)For16
- 16For
- 4Against
- 4Abstention
- 6Did not vote
Europe of Sovereign Nations (ESN)For4
- 4For
- 18Against
- 1Abstention
- 4Did not vote
Progressive Alliance of Socialists and Democrats (S&D)For25
- 25For
- 97Against
- 1Abstention
- 13Did not vote
Greens/European Free Alliance (Greens/EFA)For46
- 46For
- 1Against
- 0Abstention
- 6Did not vote
The Left in the European Parliament (GUE/NGL)For38
- 38For
- 1Against
- 0Abstention
- 7Did not vote
Renew Europe (Renew)For3
- 3For
- 61Against
- 0Abstention
- 11Did not vote
European People's Party (EPP)For4
- 4For
- 168Against
- 0Abstention
- 16Did not vote
European Conservatives and Reformists (ECR)For0
- 0For
- 69Against
- 2Abstention
- 8Did not vote
Patriots for Europe (PfE)For0
- 0For
- 13Against
- 63Abstention
- 8Did not vote
Members
Showing 10 of 718
| Name | Country | Group | Vote Position |
|---|---|---|---|
 Poland | ESN | For | |
 Slovakia | NI | For | |
 France | S&D | For | |
 Italy | Greens/EFA | For | |
 Greece | GUE/NGL | For | |
| Greece | NI | For | |
 Germany | GUE/NGL | For | |
 Netherlands | S&D | For | |
| France | S&D | For | |
| France | Greens/EFA | For |
