Vote in the European Parliament

Amending Regulation (EU) 2024/823 of 28 February 2024 on exceptional trade measures for countries and territories participating in or linked to the Stabilisation and Association Process

Kris Van Dijck – Commission proposal
Date: 13.11.2025·Reference: A10-0188/2025
Rapporteur: Kris Van Dijck

Overall Result

Adopted
  • 543 For
  • 72 Against
  • 22 Abstention
  • 81 Did not vote
Status and procedure

Outcome as recorded by the European Parliament.

Vote held on
Latest recorded step
Official Journal · (326 days ago)
Next scheduled step
No further step is scheduled in the source.
Publication in the Official Journal recorded

Procedure timeline

2025/0108(COD) · COD

Recorded procedure activities. These do not establish whether a law has entered into force.

  1. Recorded: Referral86 days until the next step
  2. Recorded: Committee stage29 days until the next step
  3. Recorded: Plenary68 days until the next step
  4. Recorded: Signature6 days until the next step
  5. Latest recorded: Official Journal
Recorded activities (12)
  1. Referral to committee
  2. Committee report tabled
  3. Committee amendments tabled
  4. Committee report adopted
  5. Tabling for plenary
  6. Tabling for plenary
  7. Tabling for plenary
  8. Parliament’s first-reading position
  9. Plenary vote
  10. Plenary vote results
  11. Signature
  12. Publication in the Official Journal
Scheduled activities (not confirmation of completion)
  1. Plenary vote

Procedure file (OEIL) · European Parliament data
Retrieved:

Sources

Data: EP Open Data API

What is this about?

  • The amendment extends autonomous trade measures for Western Balkan countries until 2030 to ensure economic stability and market access.
  • It aims to strengthen trade relations and integration into the EU single market without additional budgetary impact.
  • The measures specifically target agricultural products such as fruit, vegetables, and wine.
  • The extension provides legal clarity and reduces administrative burdens.
  • Conditionality regarding democracy and human rights remains in place.
Source: Explanatory Statement (AI Generated)

Amendment history (3)

Wording as published by the EP, in English.

  1. Amendment 1Rejected

    Recital 5 a (new)

    Tabled by Markéta Gregorová · Verts/ALE

    Added: (5 a) However, Serbia is not compliant with the conditions provided for in Article 2(1), point (d), of Regulation (EU) 2024/823 due to the persistent and serious erosion of the rule of law and fundamental principles of democracy, including free and fair elections. Additionally, Serbia's alignment with the Union's Common Foreign and Security Policy (CFSP) has been steadily declining since 2021, and Serbia has not aligned with restrictive measure against Russia, nor with the majority of the statements of the Union High Representative for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy relating to Russia and Ukraine. Serbia has also not aligned with Union restrictive measures relating to Russia, China, Belarus, Iran, the Democratic People’s Republic of Korea and Venezuela. For those reasons, ATMs should not be prolonged for Serbia.

  2. Amendment 2Rejected

    Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1 – point b a (new)

    Tabled by Markéta Gregorová · Verts/ALE

    Added: (b a) In Article 2(1), point (d) is replaced by the following: ‘(d) abstention of the beneficiary parties from engaging in serious and systematic violations of human rights, including core labour rights, of fundamental principles of democracy and of the rule of law. The compliance with this condition shall be assessed annually on the basis of the Union's annual enlargement country reports and, where applicable, the Union's annual Rule of Law Report. The outcome of that assessment shall be reported to the European Parliament.’

  3. Amendment 3Rejected

    Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point -1

    Tabled by Markéta Gregorová · Verts/ALE

    Added: -1 In Article 1, paragraph 1 is replaced by the following: ‘1. Products originating in Albania, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Kosovo, Montenegro and North Macedonia (‘the beneficiary parties’) covered by Chapters 7 and 8 of the Combined Nomenclature shall be admitted for import into the Union without quantitative restrictions or measures having equivalent effect, and with exemption from custom duties and charges having equivalent effect.’

Vote by political group

How the political groups voted

Members

Showing 10 of 718

Vote Position
NameCountryGroupVote Position
GermanyEPP
For
GermanyEPP
For
SpainS&D
For
ItalyECR
For
BulgariaEPP
For
SpainS&D
For
CzechiaPfE
For
HungaryEPP
For
GermanyESN
For
SpainGreens/EFA
For
Show more
Follow us on Instagram@checksomevotes@checksomevotes_en