Vote in the European Parliament
2023 discharge: General budget of the EU - European Council and Council
Overall Result
Adopted- 441 For
- 125 Against
- 73 Abstention
- 80 Did not vote
How we count
- Yes, No and Abstention come from the European Parliament's roll-call voting protocol.
- “Did not vote” is derived: MEPs with a mandate on the voting day for whom no vote was recorded. Abstentions do not count towards this.
- Subsequent vote corrections are shown but do not change the official result.
- Each vote (overall vote, amendment, partial vote) counts separately. Therefore totals may differ from pages that count differently.
Status and procedure
Outcome as recorded by the European Parliament.
- Vote held on
- Latest recorded step
- Other activity · (387 days ago)
- Next scheduled step
- No further step is scheduled in the source.
- Publication in the Official Journal recorded
Procedure timeline
2024/2021(DEC) · DEC
Recorded procedure activities. These do not establish whether a law has entered into force.
- Recorded: Referral
- Recorded: Committee stage
- Recorded: Plenary
- Recorded: Committee stage
- Recorded: Plenary
- Recorded: Official Journal
- Recorded: Plenary
- Latest recorded: Other activity
Recorded activities (25)
- Referral to committee
- Committee opinion tabled
- Committee report tabled
- Committee opinion adopted
- Committee amendments tabled
- Committee report adopted
- Tabling for plenary
- Tabling for plenary
- Tabling for plenary
- Tabling for plenary
- Tabling for plenary
- Plenary debate
- Plenary vote
- Plenary vote results
- Committee report tabled
- Committee amendments tabled
- Committee report adopted
- Tabling for plenary
- Publication in the Official Journal
- Tabling for plenary
- Tabling for plenary
- Tabling for plenary
- Other recorded activity
- Plenary vote
- Plenary vote results
Scheduled activities (not confirmation of completion)
- Plenary debate
- Plenary vote
- Plenary vote
Procedure file (OEIL) · European Parliament data
Retrieved:
Sources
Data: EP Open Data API
What is this about?
- Refusal to grant discharge for Council and European Council 2023 .
- Criticism of lack of cooperation since 2009 .
- Demand for greater transparency and democratic oversight.
Amendment history (4)
Wording as published by the EP, in English.
Paragraph 16
Tabled by Gerben-Jan Gerbrandy · Renew
16. Strongly regrets
Removed: Hungary’sAdded: the Hungarian's government’s obstructive stance within the European Council; notes that ongoing political deadlocks and …Paragraph 16 a (new)
Tabled by Gerben-Jan Gerbrandy · Renew
Added: 16 a. Welcomes the decision to adopt conclusions supported by 26 member states on the Union’s continued and unwavering support for Ukraine’s independence, sovereignty, and territorial integrity, as set out in European Council document EUCO 16/25 adopted on 26 June 2025; regrets that such a course was necessary due to persistent vetoes; calls for the development of alternative mechanisms to bypass vetoes in urgent matters, pending treaty changes to improve decision-making efficiency and unity within the European Council; underlines that the Union's budget for 2023 has already mobilised substantial resources to support Ukraine, and stresses the importance of ensuring that future budgetary decisions reflect this strategic commitment.
Paragraph 16 a (new)
Tabled by Gerben-Jan Gerbrandy · Renew
Added: 16 a. Welcomes the decision to adopt conclusions supported by 26 member states on the Union’s continued and unwavering support for Ukraine’s independence, sovereignty, and territorial integrity, as set out in European Council document EUCO 16/25 adopted on 26 June 2025; regrets that such a course was necessary due to persistent vetoes; calls for the development of alternative mechanisms to bypass vetoes in urgent matters, pending treaty changes to improve decision-making efficiency and unity within the European Council; underlines that the Union's budget for 2023 has already mobilised substantial resources to support Ukraine, and stresses the importance of ensuring that future budgetary decisions reflect this strategic commitment.
Paragraph 15 a (new)
Tabled by Sarah Knafo, Milan Uhrík · ESN
Added: 15 a. Calls on the Council to introduce, for the future, an annual target of at least a 3% reduction in administrative expenditure, excluding inflation, particularly in operating costs, missions and institutional communication, in accordance with the principle of budgetary restraint;
Vote by political group
How the political groups voted
- 7For
- 12Against
- 9Abstention
- 2Did not vote
- 164For
- 0Against
- 3Abstention
- 21Did not vote
- 116For
- 0Against
- 0Abstention
- 20Did not vote
- 71For
- 0Against
- 0Abstention
- 4Did not vote
- 49For
- 0Against
- 0Abstention
- 4Did not vote
- 34For
- 0Against
- 5Abstention
- 7Did not vote
- 0For
- 22Against
- 1Abstention
- 4Did not vote
- 0For
- 80Against
- 0Abstention
- 5Did not vote
- 0For
- 11Against
- 55Abstention
- 13Did not vote
Members
Showing 10 of 719
| Name | Country | Group | Vote Position |
|---|---|---|---|
For | |||
For | |||
For | |||
For | |||
For | |||
For | |||
For | |||
For | |||
For | |||
For |