Vote in the European Parliament

2023 discharge: General budget of the EU - Agencies

Erik Marquardt – Motion for a resolution (as a whole)
Date: 22.10.2025·Reference: A10-0169/2025
Rapporteur: Erik Marquardt

Overall Result

Adopted
  • 476 For
  • 99 Against
  • 72 Abstention
  • 72 Did not vote
Status and procedure

Outcome as recorded by the European Parliament.

Vote held on
Latest recorded step
Official Journal · (304 days ago)
Next scheduled step
No further step is scheduled in the source.
Publication in the Official Journal recorded

Procedure timeline

2024/2030(DEC) · DEC

Recorded procedure activities. These do not establish whether a law has entered into force.

  1. Recorded: Referral38 days until the next step
  2. Recorded: Committee stage171 days until the next step
  3. Recorded: Plenary105 days until the next step
  4. Recorded: Committee stage63 days until the next step
  5. Recorded: Plenary23 days until the next step
  6. Recorded: Other activity83 days until the next step
  7. Latest recorded: Official Journal
Recorded activities (37)
  1. Referral to committee
  2. Committee opinion tabled
  3. Committee opinion tabled
  4. Committee opinion tabled
  5. Committee opinion tabled
  6. Committee opinion tabled
  7. Committee opinion tabled
  8. Committee opinion tabled
  9. Committee report tabled
  10. Committee opinion adopted
  11. Committee opinion adopted
  12. Committee opinion adopted
  13. Committee opinion adopted
  14. Committee opinion adopted
  15. Committee opinion adopted
  16. Committee opinion adopted
  17. Committee amendments tabled
  18. Committee report adopted
  19. Tabling for plenary
  20. Tabling for plenary
  21. Tabling for plenary
  22. Tabling for plenary
  23. Tabling for plenary
  24. Tabling for plenary
  25. Tabling for plenary
  26. Plenary debate
  27. Plenary vote
  28. Plenary vote results
  29. Committee report tabled
  30. Committee amendments tabled
  31. Committee report adopted
  32. Tabling for plenary
  33. Tabling for plenary
  34. Other recorded activity
  35. Plenary vote
  36. Plenary vote results
  37. Publication in the Official Journal
Scheduled activities (not confirmation of completion)
  1. Plenary debate
  2. Plenary vote
  3. Plenary vote

Procedure file (OEIL) · European Parliament data
Retrieved:

Sources

Data: EP Open Data API

What is this about?

  • Discharge of the Asylum Agency for 2023 budget execution.
  • OLAF report reveals governance failures and delays.
  • Demand for transparency and structural reform.
Source: AI Summary with Mistral

Amendment history (4)

Wording as published by the EP, in English.

  1. Amendment 1 · Motion for a resolutionRejected

    Recital A

    Tabled by Sarah Knafo, Milan Uhrík · ESN

    … of the Union for the funds entrusted to them as Union bodies; Added: whereas the constant creation of new EU agencies has led to administrative inflation and overlapping mandates; whereas the Union should prioritise agencies delivering tangible results in protecting borders, security and competitiveness rather than expanding bureaucratic structures;

  2. Amendment 2 · Motion for a resolutionRejected

    Paragraph 6 a (new)

    Tabled by Sarah Knafo, Milan Uhrík · ESN

    Added: 6 a. Stresses that repeated irregularities in recruitment procedures, the use of temporary appointments and the promotion of a ‘friendly circle’ within the Agency’s management, as identified by OLAF, constitute serious breaches of the EU Staff Regulations and a misuse of EU taxpayers’ money; calls for strict corrective measures to prevent the repetition of such practices;

  3. Amendment 3 · Motion for a resolutionRejected

    Paragraph 10 a (new)

    Tabled by Sarah Knafo, Milan Uhrík · ESN

    Added: 10 a. Regrets that the Management Board’s refusal to follow the disciplinary recommendations of OLAF, despite documented findings in recruitment and management practices, sends a message of impunity; underlines that no Union body can demand citizens’ trust while tolerating misconduct within its ranks; calls on the Commission to assess whether the Agency’s current governance model still ensures accountability and transparency;

  4. Amendment 4 · Motion for a resolutionRejected

    Paragraph 15 a (new)

    Tabled by Sarah Knafo, Milan Uhrík · ESN

    Added: 15 a. Notes that certain communications and activities of the Agency have gone beyond its mandate by promoting political narratives on asylum and migration; recalls that EU agencies must operate with full ideological neutrality and avoid advocacy or activism;

Vote by political group

How the political groups voted

Members

Showing 10 of 719

Vote Position
NameCountryGroupVote Position
SpainS&D
For
FranceS&D
For
GermanyEPP
For
ItalyEPP
For
AustriaS&D
For
NetherlandsEPP
For
PortugalS&D
For
SpainEPP
For
GreeceEPP
For
SpainEPP
For
Show more
Follow us on Instagram@checksomevotes@checksomevotes_en