Vote in the European Parliament
2023 discharge: General budget of the EU - Agencies
Overall Result
Adopted- 476 For
- 99 Against
- 72 Abstention
- 72 Did not vote
How we count
- Yes, No and Abstention come from the European Parliament's roll-call voting protocol.
- “Did not vote” is derived: MEPs with a mandate on the voting day for whom no vote was recorded. Abstentions do not count towards this.
- Subsequent vote corrections are shown but do not change the official result.
- Each vote (overall vote, amendment, partial vote) counts separately. Therefore totals may differ from pages that count differently.
Status and procedure
Outcome as recorded by the European Parliament.
- Vote held on
- Latest recorded step
- Official Journal · (304 days ago)
- Next scheduled step
- No further step is scheduled in the source.
- Publication in the Official Journal recorded
Procedure timeline
2024/2030(DEC) · DEC
Recorded procedure activities. These do not establish whether a law has entered into force.
- Recorded: Referral
- Recorded: Committee stage
- Recorded: Plenary
- Recorded: Committee stage
- Recorded: Plenary
- Recorded: Other activity
- Latest recorded: Official Journal
Recorded activities (37)
- Referral to committee
- Committee opinion tabled
- Committee opinion tabled
- Committee opinion tabled
- Committee opinion tabled
- Committee opinion tabled
- Committee opinion tabled
- Committee opinion tabled
- Committee report tabled
- Committee opinion adopted
- Committee opinion adopted
- Committee opinion adopted
- Committee opinion adopted
- Committee opinion adopted
- Committee opinion adopted
- Committee opinion adopted
- Committee amendments tabled
- Committee report adopted
- Tabling for plenary
- Tabling for plenary
- Tabling for plenary
- Tabling for plenary
- Tabling for plenary
- Tabling for plenary
- Tabling for plenary
- Plenary debate
- Plenary vote
- Plenary vote results
- Committee report tabled
- Committee amendments tabled
- Committee report adopted
- Tabling for plenary
- Tabling for plenary
- Other recorded activity
- Plenary vote
- Plenary vote results
- Publication in the Official Journal
Scheduled activities (not confirmation of completion)
- Plenary debate
- Plenary vote
- Plenary vote
Procedure file (OEIL) · European Parliament data
Retrieved:
Sources
Data: EP Open Data API
What is this about?
- Discharge of the Asylum Agency for 2023 budget execution.
- OLAF report reveals governance failures and delays.
- Demand for transparency and structural reform.
Amendment history (4)
Wording as published by the EP, in English.
Recital A
Tabled by Sarah Knafo, Milan Uhrík · ESN
… of the Union for the funds entrusted to them as Union bodies; Added: whereas the constant creation of new EU agencies has led to administrative inflation and overlapping mandates; whereas the Union should prioritise agencies delivering tangible results in protecting borders, security and competitiveness rather than expanding bureaucratic structures;
Paragraph 6 a (new)
Tabled by Sarah Knafo, Milan Uhrík · ESN
Added: 6 a. Stresses that repeated irregularities in recruitment procedures, the use of temporary appointments and the promotion of a ‘friendly circle’ within the Agency’s management, as identified by OLAF, constitute serious breaches of the EU Staff Regulations and a misuse of EU taxpayers’ money; calls for strict corrective measures to prevent the repetition of such practices;
Paragraph 10 a (new)
Tabled by Sarah Knafo, Milan Uhrík · ESN
Added: 10 a. Regrets that the Management Board’s refusal to follow the disciplinary recommendations of OLAF, despite documented findings in recruitment and management practices, sends a message of impunity; underlines that no Union body can demand citizens’ trust while tolerating misconduct within its ranks; calls on the Commission to assess whether the Agency’s current governance model still ensures accountability and transparency;
Paragraph 15 a (new)
Tabled by Sarah Knafo, Milan Uhrík · ESN
Added: 15 a. Notes that certain communications and activities of the Agency have gone beyond its mandate by promoting political narratives on asylum and migration; recalls that EU agencies must operate with full ideological neutrality and avoid advocacy or activism;
Vote by political group
How the political groups voted
- 19For
- 6Against
- 3Abstention
- 2Did not vote
- 117For
- 1Against
- 0Abstention
- 18Did not vote
- 168For
- 1Against
- 3Abstention
- 16Did not vote
- 71For
- 1Against
- 0Abstention
- 3Did not vote
- 48For
- 0Against
- 0Abstention
- 5Did not vote
- 8For
- 6Against
- 65Abstention
- 6Did not vote
- 39For
- 2Against
- 0Abstention
- 5Did not vote
- 3For
- 63Against
- 0Abstention
- 13Did not vote
- 3For
- 19Against
- 1Abstention
- 4Did not vote
Members
Showing 10 of 719
| Name | Country | Group | Vote Position |
|---|---|---|---|
For | |||
For | |||
For | |||
For | |||
For | |||
For | |||
For | |||
For | |||
For | |||
For |